村干部在产业扶贫合作社中“扶亲”了吗——来自世界银行第六期扶贫项目的证据

Do Village Leaders Favor Their Clan Relatives in Industrial Poverty Alleviation——Evidence from the World Bank's Sixth Poverty Alleviation Project in China

  • 摘要: 内生于农村宗族网络的村干部,在执行公共政策、分配公共资源时会“扶亲”吗?基于世界银行乌蒙山、六盘山贫困片区产业扶贫试点示范项目2018年中国3省8县40村1 149个样本截面数据的研究发现,村干部的同姓宗亲更可能参加项目,且在排除了农户能力和宗族势力的干扰后研究结果依然稳健。调节效应分析表明,民主监督和政府监督水平越高的村庄,村干部对其宗亲合作社参与的影响越强,这排除了精英俘获或偏袒行为,支持了村干部的动员效应假说,即村干部通过宗族网络动员影响了村民的项目参与决策。异质性分析发现,动员效应主要由村民委员会主任驱动。概言之,农村宗族网络在当下乡村治理进程中可以发挥良性作用,而民主监督和政府监督都能够促进这种效应,村民选举产生的村民委员会主任在利用宗族关系开展动员工作方面具有优势。应该全面认识宗族文化和宗族网络对农村社会治理的影响,在推进乡村治理现代化和产业发展过程中充分发挥宗族文化和宗族网络的积极作用。

     

    Abstract: Embedded in the deeply rooted rural clan networks, do village leaders favor their clan relatives in policy implementation and public resources allocation? This paper aims to answer this question. Based on the monitoring data of a World Bank financed poverty alleviation and agriculture development project in China, we find that village leaders' clan relatives are indeed more likely to participate in the project. The result remains robust even when we control for household characteristics and clan size. We find that the higher the level of democratic and governmental supervision, the stronger the effect of village leaders on the project participation of their clan relatives, which excludes the existence of capture or favoritism, and supports the mobilization theory. In other words, village leaders did not favor their clan relatives in the project, but were more likely to mobilize them to participate in the project through the clan network. Moreover, we show that the effect is mainly driven by village chairmen rather than party secretaries, which also supports the mobilization theory. The main result remains robust even after eliminating abnormal data and replacing some variables.

     

/

返回文章
返回