• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
HE Ling-zhi, WENG Jin-ming, DENG Yu-ming. Research on Third Party Evaluation of University Library[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019, (4): 53-57.
Citation: HE Ling-zhi, WENG Jin-ming, DENG Yu-ming. Research on Third Party Evaluation of University Library[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019, (4): 53-57.

Research on Third Party Evaluation of University Library

More Information
  • Received Date: February 22, 2019
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • Under the background of constructing Double First-rate universities, university library, as a vital public space of the university, is not only the main means of serving students, but also an indispensable platform for educating. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate its work. Compared with other evaluation models, the third-party evaluation is more independent, objective and fair, and its evaluation results can objectively reflect the indicators of the university library. At present, the third-party evaluation of university libraries has significantly developed, and the qualifications, evaluation indicators and institutional arrangements of the third-party agencies are all important factors in the assessment activities.
  • [1]
    陈非.高校评估对高校图书馆的影响.山东省农业管理干部学院学报, 2005(3):157. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7540.2005.03.086
    [2]
    陈伟.对高校图书馆评估的思考.赤峰学院学报:自然科学版, 2012(8):153—155. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tsgjs200702032
    [3]
    黄迎春.图书馆评价研究及对高校图书馆评价工作的思考.四川图书馆学报, 2012(1):81—83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7136.2012.01.022
    [4]
    龙润琛.新中国高校图书馆发展历史研究.济南: 山东大学硕士学位论文, 2008: 13—50. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10422-2008188945.htm
    [5]
    詹长智. "高校图书馆统计与评估研讨会"综述.大学图书馆学报, 2017(5):10—14. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxtsgxb201705002
    [6]
    王向军.高校图书馆评估30年回顾与展望.图书馆理论与实践, 2010 (3) : 67—71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2010.03.019
    [7]
    张泽梅.我国高校图书馆评估体系的构建与应用研究.长春: 东北师范大学硕士学位论文, 2006: 3—5.
    [8]
    黄如花, 宋琳琳.论图书馆评价的主体.中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(3):34—44. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgtsgxb201003005
    [9]
    张霞.基于第三方评价的图书馆绩效评估体系.管理纵横, 2013(2):20—22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tsgxk201302007
    [10]
    王学贤.公共图书馆第三方评估机制研究.图书馆, 2014(4):45 —47. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tusg201404010
    [11]
    郑俊生.我国高校图书馆评估发展趋势之我见.晋图学刊, 1993(3):18—19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JTXU199303006.htm
    [12]
    张红霞.国际图书馆服务质量评估:绩效评估与成效评估两大体系的形成与发展.中国图书馆学报, 2009(179):78—85.
    [13]
    R. POLL. Ten Years after: Measuring Quality Revised. Performance Measurement & Metrics, 2008, 9(1):26—37. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ027606868/
    [14]
    吴庆珍.引入第三方评价完善图书馆绩效评估体系.图书馆理论与实践, 2012 (6):4—8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8214.2012.06.002
    [15]
    范超.高校图书馆绩效评估.大连: 大连海事大学硕士学位论文, 2012: 10—13. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y2258931
    [16]
    温小明.高校图书馆新的评估工作及指标体系探析.图书馆建设, 2014(6):75—79. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=50149353
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 钟筱雨,李朝霞,念家雯,李轶文. “切割”抑或“重组”:非教学时间大学教学空间使用的个案研究. 现代教育论丛. 2024(04): 93-102 .
    2. 罗长元. 现状审视与优化策略:论中小学教学空间的变革. 课程教学研究. 2023(02): 17-23 .
    3. 黄一帆,周福盛. “双减”背景下学校育人的空间转向. 当代教育论坛. 2022(03): 116-124 .
    4. 黎兴成,李中国. 论教学的对象思维及其超越. 教育学术月刊. 2022(05): 97-105 .
    5. 吕伟艳. 概念·缘由·治策 国内教室空间研究的三维述评. 教育实践与研究(C). 2021(01): 50-53+56 .
    6. 王鑫,何标,梁培. 规训权力视域下教学空间的异化及其回归. 课程教学研究. 2021(05): 18-22 .
    7. 陈飞. 高校教学空间教育力探析——以大学大型通用教室为例. 教育发展研究. 2019(17): 79-84 .

    Other cited types(18)

Catalog

    Article views (2156) PDF downloads (64) Cited by(25)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return