造就“有教养的人”:重温理查德·彼得斯的自由教育哲学

Cultivating the "Educated Men": Revisiting Richard S. Peters' Philosophy of Liberal Education

  • 摘要: 关于受教育者“应该成为什么样的人”的问题,乃是标定教育目的和教育理想、决定教育内容和教育方法的教育学的核心命题。在20世纪70年代后期,英国分析教育哲学家彼得斯秉承柏拉图有关培养“自由人”的理性教育传统,通过有效区分作为理想结果的“教育”与指向却又并不必然导致这一结果的“被教授”或“接受课程训练”等“有关教育活动”,将“教育”确立为一种衡量和判断教-学活动的正当性与合理性的价值标准。进而,他又从教育本身所具有的非工具价值和无限性出发,为作为教育理想结果的“有教养的人”开创性地制定了三项价值标准:一是面向事物内在价值而非实用目的的自主学习态度;二是一切求真活动所必备的辨别力和理解力;三是超越专业训练的整体性人格的和谐。由此,彼得斯认为,从一个处于无限发展中“有教养的人”的育人理想出发,一切教育活动都应当鼓励人们忽视那种一成不变的知识体系观,欣然接受人们各种不同程度的理解方式。是否拥有这种健全的理解力,不仅是区分一个人是否“有教养”的标志,也决定了一个人对人类生活普遍条件的一般信念、态度和反应。

     

    Abstract: The question of what kind of person the educated should become is the core proposition of education that defines educational goals and ideals, determines educational content and methods. In the late 1970s, British educational philosopher Peters adhered to Plato's rational educational tradition of cultivating "free men", and established "education" as a value standard for measuring and judging the legitimacy and rationality of teaching and learning activities by effectively distinguishing between "education" as an ideal result and "related educational activities" such as "being taught" or "receiving curriculum training" that do not necessarily lead to this result. Furthermore, starting from the non-instrumental value and infinite nature of education itself, three value standards have been innovatively formulated for the "educated person" as the ideal result of education: first, an autonomous learning attitude oriented towards the intrinsic value of things rather than practical purposes; second, the discernment and understanding necessary for all truth-seeking activities; third, the harmony of the holistic personality beyond narrow professional training. Therefore, Peters believes that starting from the ideal of cultivating a "educated person" in infinite development, all educational activities should encourage people to ignore the unchanging view of the knowledge system and willingly accept various levels of understanding held by people. Whether or not one possesses such a sound understanding is not only a criterion for distinguishing whether a person is "educated", but also determines a person's general beliefs, attitudes, and reactions towards the universal conditions of human life. Only in this way can education transcend narrow political and economic tool positions, eliminate the arrogance and prejudice brought by pre-modern mechanized training and dogmatic indoctrination, and the resulting social divisions.

     

/

返回文章
返回