环境司法制度改革对企业绿色创新的影响:实质性绿色创新还是漂绿?——基于公益诉讼试点的证据

The Impact of Environmental Judicial System Reform on Green Innovation in Enterprises: Substantive Innovation or Greenwashing?——Evidence from Public Interest Litigation Pilots

  • 摘要: 研究环境司法制度改革如何影响企业的绿色创新行为,对于探索和实践中国绿色发展道路具有重要意义。通过构建“地方检察机关—地方政府—企业”三方主体的演化博弈模型,以环境公益诉讼政策为研究切入点,采用双重差分模型进行实证检验,探讨环境公益诉讼政策实施前后博弈主体的策略选择、演化路径以及政策的作用机制和实施效果,发现:环境公益诉讼有效促进了企业进行实质性绿色创新,并体现在企业绿色创新质量提升和漂绿行为减少;环境公益诉讼主要通过加强地区环境监管、抑制政企合谋和改善地区法治环境来推动企业进行实质性绿色创新;环境公益诉讼主要促进了国有企业、较高公众环境关注度地区的企业以及竞争型市场结构的企业的实质性绿色创新。这为全面理解环境公益诉讼作用的微观机理和差异化效果以及完善环境司法制度从而推动企业绿色转型提供了重要的经验证据。

     

    Abstract: How the reform of the environmental judicial system affects the green innovation behavior of enterprises is of great significance for exploring and practicing China's green development path. This paper constructs an evolutionary game model of the three parties of "local procuratorates-local governments-enterprises", and takes the environmental public interest litigation policy as the research entry point, adopts the DID model for empirical testing, explores the strategic choice and evolutionary path of the game subjects before and after the implementation of the environmental public interest litigation policy, and analyzes the policy's mechanism and implementation effect. The results show that: first, the environmental public interest litigation pilot effectively promotes enterprises to carry out substantive green innovation, which is reflected in the improvement of the quality of green innovation and the reduction of greenwashing behavior. Second, in terms of the mechanism of action, the environmental public interest litigation pilot mainly promotes the green innovation of enterprises by strengthening regional environmental supervision, curbing government-enterprise collusion and improving the regional rule of law environment. Third, the pilot policy mainly promotes the substantive green innovation activities of state-owned enterprises, enterprises in regions with high public environmental attention, and enterprises with competitive market structures.This provides important empirical evidence for a comprehensive understanding of the micro-mechanism and differentiated effects of environmental public interest litigation, and for improving the environmental justice to promote the green transformation of enterprises.

     

/

返回文章
返回