The Impact of Local Officials' Agriculture-related Experience on the Development of Agro-product Geographical Indications

YOU Xuanwen; WAN Junyi

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (3): 136-148.

YOU Xuanwen, WAN Junyi. The Impact of Local Officials' Agriculture-related Experience on the Development of Agro-product Geographical Indications[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (3): 136-148.

Citation:

PDF (1738 KB)

The Impact of Local Officials' Agriculture-related Experience on the Development of Agro-product Geographical Indications

YOU Xuanwen,
WAN Junyi^,

More Information

Received Date: August 16, 2021
Available Online: May 30, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

There is a mismatch between the spatial distribution of agro-product geographical indications(AGI)and agricultural resources in China. Against the background of emphasizing the local officials' responsibility for territorial management, the development of AGI might be correlated with local officials' intrinsic characteristics. Applying the fixed effect panel regression model based on the data of Chinese cities from 2008 to 2018 and taking local officials' agriculture-related experience into consideration, it is found that the local officials with agriculture-related experience can significantly improve AGI development, and this impact increases over time. The analysis of the mechanism shows that both policy commitments and fiscal funds for agriculture have significant mediating effect between local officials' agriculture-related experience and the development of AGI. Compared with the role of fiscal funds for agriculture, the mediating effect of policy commitments is more obvious.
- local official,
- agriculture-related experience,
- agro-product geographical indication,
- mediating effect

FullText(HTML)

References (36)

References

[1]	万俊毅, 徐静. 推进农业"三品一标"建设引领农业提质增效[N]. 南方日报, 2021-08-02(A11).
[2]	STARBIRD S A. Moral hazard, inspection policy, and food safety[J]. American journal of agricultural economics, 2005, 87(1): 15-27. doi: 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2005.00698.x
[3]	DRANOVE D, JIM G Z. Quality disclosure and certification: theory and practice[J]. Journal of economic literature, 2010, 48(4): 935-963. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.4.935
[4]	肖人荣, 赵鹏军, 戚禹林, 等. 农产品地理标志品牌的空间异质性特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(6): 1126-1136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NXDH202106015.htm
[5]	李裕瑞, 卜长利, 王鹏艳. 中国农产品地理标志的地域分异特征[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 36(4): 827-840. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZX202104002.htm
[6]	李维安, 钱先航. 地方官员治理与城市商业银行的信贷投放[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, 11(4): 1239-1260. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU201204005.htm
[7]	宋冉, 陈广汉. 官员特征、经历与地方政府教育支出偏好——来自中国地级市的经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2016(12): 160-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJGU201612014.htm
[8]	周广肃, 张牧扬, 樊纲. 地方官员任职经历、公共转移支付与居民消费不平等[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(1): 61-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU202001003.htm
[9]	杜博士, 徐济益. 官员知青经历影响乡村振兴了吗?[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2019, 18(2): 233-243. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JNDS201902012.htm
[10]	夏龙, 姜德娟, 隋文香. 中国地理标志农产品的空间分布与增收效应[J]. 产经评论, 2015, 6(1): 78-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TQYG201501009.htm
[11]	LIU G, ZHANG Q, YIN G. Spatial distribution of geographical indications for agricultural products and their drivers in China[J]. Environmental earth sciences, 2016, 75(7). DOI: 10.10071512665-016-5426-7.
[12]	尤萱文, 万俊毅. 地方官员涉农经历对农产品质量安全水平的空间溢出效应研究——来自中国地级市的证据[J]. 南方经济, 2022(3): 37-52. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFJJ202203003.htm
[13]	HAMBRICK D C. Upper echelons theory: an update[J]. The academy of management review, 2007, 32(2): 334-343. doi: 10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
[14]	MARQUIS C, TILCSIK A. Imprinting: toward a multilevel theory[J]. Academy of management annals, 2013, 7(1): 195-245. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2013.766076
[15]	DITTMAR A, DUCHIN R. Looking in the rearview mirror: the effect of managers' professional experience on corporate financial policy[J]. The review of financial studies, 2016, 29(3): 565-602.
[16]	文雁兵, 郭瑞, 史晋川. 用贤则理: 治理能力与经济增长——来自中国百强县和贫困县的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(3): 18-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-291X.2020.03.009
[17]	DREHER A, LAMLA M J, LEIN S M, et al. The impact of political leaders' profession and education on reforms[J]. Journal of comparative economics, 2009, 37(1): 169-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2008.08.005
[18]	GOODALL A H, BAKER A. A theory exploring how expert leaders influence performance in knowledge intensive organizations[J]. Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2015(5): 49-67.
[19]	李树, 许峻桦. 地方官员的专业背景与农村金融供给——基于西部XX市区(县)级官员的数据分析[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2018, 33(5): 95-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JIRO201805009.htm
[20]	杨凡. 官员教育和职业背景与公司发展实证研究[J]. 投资研究, 2017(6): 151-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZYJ201706012.htm
[21]	张树忠, 朱一鸣. 地方官员的金融背景与辖区金融发展——来自中国省级官员的证据[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2015(5): 16-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4625.2015.05.004
[22]	中央党校采访实录编辑室. 习近平的七年知青岁月[M]. 北京: 中共中央党校出版社, 2017: 398-402.
[23]	杨君, 倪星. 晋升预期、政治责任感与地方官员政策承诺可信度——基于副省级城市2001-2009年政府年度工作报告的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013(5): 96-103. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2013.05.20
[24]	姜雅婷, 柴国荣. 目标考核如何影响安全生产治理效果: 政府承诺的中介效应[J]. 公共行政评论, 2018, 11(1): 166-186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2018.01.008
[25]	杨君, 王珺. 地方官员政治承诺可信度及其行动逻辑——来自副省级城市政府年度工作报告(2002-2011)的经验证据[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 54(1): 165-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDS201401018.htm
[26]	HAYO B, NEUMEIER F. Political leaders' socioeconomic background and fiscal performance in Germany[J]. European journal of political economy, 2014, 34: 184-205. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.009
[27]	宋冉, 陈广汉. 官员特征、经历与地方政府教育支出偏好——来自中国地级市的经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2016(12): 160-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJGU201612014.htm
[28]	王贤彬, 徐现祥. 官员能力与经济发展——来自省级官员个体效应的证据[J]. 南方经济, 2014, 32(6): 1-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6249.2014.06.001
[29]	PERSSON, ZHURAVSKAYA. The limits of career concern in federalism: evidence from China[J]. Journal of European economic association, 2016, 14(2): 338-374. doi: 10.1111/jeea.12142
[30]	OCCASION W. Attention to attention[J]. Organization science, 2011, 22(5): 1286-1296. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0602
[31]	章文光, 刘志鹏. 注意力视角下政策冲突中地方政府的行为逻辑——基于精准扶贫的案例分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2020, 17(4): 152-162. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL202004015.htm
[32]	文宏, 赵晓伟. 政府公共服务注意力配置与公共财政资源的投入方向选择——基于中部六省政府工作报告(2007-2012年)的文本分析[J]. 软科学, 2015(6): 5-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XUXI201506002.htm
[33]	赵金丽, 张落成, 陈肖飞. 江苏省地理标志品牌溢出效应及地区差异分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2014, 31(6): 760-767. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKYB201406007.htm
[34]	郭瑞, 文雁兵, 史晋川. 地方官员与经济发展: 一个文献综述[J]. 管理评论, 2018, 30(12): 247-256. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWGD201812030.htm
[35]	温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200405016.htm
[36]	李惠娟, 蔡伟宏. 离岸生产性服务外包与东道国产业结构升级——基于跨国面板数据的中介效应实证分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(3): 113-123. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMW201803009.htm

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	钱旭. 投资仲裁视域下联合解释条款的适用争议：性质界定与中国因应. 环球法律评论. 2025(01): 188-203 .
2.	李妮. UAB E energija诉拉脱维亚共和国仲裁案评析. 商事仲裁与调解. 2024(01): 118-131 .
3.	张卫彬. 条约演进解释的理据、模式及规制路径. 法学. 2024(06): 159-175 .
4.	徐树，谢楚儿. 语言学视阈下条约不同语言作准文本的解释困境及其出路. 国际法学刊. 2024(03): 44-70+156 .
5.	宋阳，顾思存. 《新加坡调解公约》政府保留条款的问题与中国应对. 商事仲裁与调解. 2024(06): 48-61 .
6.	何焰，谷放. 比例原则在国际投资仲裁中的适用反思：场域边界与规范张力. 武大国际法评论. 2023(02): 138-157 .
7.	李想. 条约解释中嗣后实践的基本构成和功能定位. 湖北职业技术学院学报. 2023(03): 68-72 .
8.	宋阳. 国际投资仲裁准据法的平衡适用论. 现代法学. 2022(03): 194-205 .
9.	王亚萍. 双边投资协定中“涉及征收补偿款”仲裁条款解释分歧的纾解. 商事仲裁与调解. 2022(06): 106-118 .
10.	李雪娇. ISDS仲裁机制下安全例外条款管辖问题研究——以仲裁庭管辖权能扩张为背景. 北京仲裁. 2022(03): 119-133 .

Other cited types(26)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (396) PDF downloads (193) Cited by(36)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Impact of Local Officials' Agriculture-related Experience on the Development of Agro-product Geographical Indications

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

Other cited types(26)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content