• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
SONG Kaiye, XU Yaqian. Multi-Level Mediation across Organizational Boundaries: How Can Digital Platforms Empower Social Governance?[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (6): 122-137.
Citation: SONG Kaiye, XU Yaqian. Multi-Level Mediation across Organizational Boundaries: How Can Digital Platforms Empower Social Governance?[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (6): 122-137.

Multi-Level Mediation across Organizational Boundaries: How Can Digital Platforms Empower Social Governance?

More Information
  • Received Date: June 04, 2023
  • Available Online: January 15, 2024
  • As an emerging governance mechanism, digital platform plays an important role in China's social governance. However, existing studies have underestimated the social impact of this important empirical phenomenon, without providing a theoretical explanation of how the digital platform enables the integration of social governance. Through investigating the experience and exploration of platform-based social governance in many regions, using interviews with key participants and research on policy documents, the article abstracts "multi-level mediation across organizational boundaries" to summarize the internal mechanism of digital platform's effective empowerment of social governance. On the one hand, digital platform manages the relationship between the party and the league, digital platform enterprises, the public and other entities and government departments in external coordination, expand the scope of solving public problems by mobilizing resources. On the other hand, the digital platform manages the diverse members of the government through internal coordination, links the data, channels and resources of different members of the government as an obligatory passage point (OPP), and cultivates the awareness and trust of cooperation around specific social issues. The outlook of this article lies in how to construct effective interaction mechanisms, enhance conceptual consistency and cultivate knowledge and abilities that match actors, which will be potential directions to break through the bottleneck of digital platform empowerment.

  • [1]
    单勇. 数字平台与犯罪治理转型[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, 37(4): 45-68.
    [2]
    宋锴业. 中国平台组织发展与政府组织转型——基于政务平台运作的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(11): 172-194. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.11.013
    [3]
    彭勃, 刘旭. 破解基层治理的协同难题: 数字化平台的条块统合路径[J]. 理论与改革, 2022(5): 42-56.
    [4]
    沈永东, 毕荟蓉. 数字治理平台提升政社共治有效性的多元机制: 以"社会治理云"与"微嘉园"为研究对象[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2021(6): 113-121.
    [5]
    CAPROTTI F, LIU D. Emerging platform urbanism in China: reconfigurations of data, citizenship and materialities[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2019, 151(7): 1-5.
    [6]
    TÖRNBERG P. How platforms govern: social regulation in digital capitalism[J]. Big data & society, 2023, 10(1): 1-13.
    [7]
    陈方. 数字时代背景下农户、银行机构与乡村治理的融合发展——以长兴县"141+N"数字化治理平台为例[J]. 公共治理研究, 2022, 34(1): 30-37.
    [8]
    付翠莲, 张慧. "理念—制度—技术"视角下乡村治理数字化转型的逻辑与机制——以德清县"一图感知五四"数字化平台为例[J]. 公共治理研究, 2022, 34(2): 44-52.
    [9]
    唐京华. 数字技术驱动科层组织领域化运作的逻辑——基于浙江"基层治理四平台"的案例分析[J]. 治理研究, 2023, 39(1): 40-52
    [10]
    ENS N, HUKAL P, BLEGIND J T. Dynamics of control on digital platforms[J]. Information systems journal, 2023, 33(4): 890-910. doi: 10.1111/isj.12429
    [11]
    樊丹迪. 居民参与下政府数字平台的能力提升——以北京市X区城市治理平台的防疫实践为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(11): 126-132.
    [12]
    周亚越, 洪舒迪. 数字技术驱动基层监督效能提升的行动逻辑——以W市村务清廉D平台为例[J]. 行政论坛, 2022, 29(5): 93-100.
    [13]
    STYRIN E, MOSSBERGER K, ZHULIN A. Government as a platform: intergovernmental participation for public services in the Russian Federation[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(1): 101627. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101627
    [14]
    邓念国, 杨曦娥. 数字平台驱动的政府治理创新——基于贵州"云网平台"的考察[J]. 中共杭州市委党校学报, 2022, 139(5): 56-66.
    [15]
    EFERIN Y, HOHLOV Y, ROSSOTTO C. Digital platforms in Russia: competition between national and foreign multi-sided platforms stimulates growth and innovation[J]. Digital policy, regulation and governance, 2019, 21(2): 129-145. doi: 10.1108/DPRG-11-2018-0065
    [16]
    KARHU K, GUSTAFSSON R, LYYTINEN K. Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android's five platform forks[J]. Information systems research, 2018, 29(2): 479-497. doi: 10.1287/isre.2018.0786
    [17]
    江小涓, 黄颖轩. 数字时代的市场秩序、市场监管与平台治理[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(12): 20-41.
    [18]
    蒋慧. 数字经济时代平台治理的困境及其法治化出路[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(6): 31-44.
    [19]
    BONINA C, KOSKINEN K, EATON B, et al. Digital platforms for development: foundations and research agenda[J]. Information systems journal, 2021, 31(6): 869-902. doi: 10.1111/isj.12326
    [20]
    MADON S, SCHOEMAKER E. Digital identity as a platform for improving refugee management[J]. Information systems journal, 2021, 31(6): 929-953. doi: 10.1111/isj.12353
    [21]
    范如国. 平台技术赋能、公共博弈与复杂适应性治理[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(12): 131-152.
    [22]
    GORWA R. What is platform governance?[J]. Information, communication & society, 2019, 22(6): 854-871.
    [23]
    MILLARD J. Open governance systems: doing more with more[J]. Government information quarterly, 2018, 35(4): S77-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.003
    [24]
    ANSELL C, MIURA S. Can the power of platforms be harnessed for governance?[J]. Public administration, 2020, 98(1): 261-276. doi: 10.1111/padm.12636
    [25]
    CHEN Y, RICHTER J I, PATEL P C. Decentralized governance of digital platforms[J]. Journal of management, 2021, 47(5): 1305-1337. doi: 10.1177/0149206320916755
    [26]
    AHUJA S, CHAN Y E, KRISHNAMURTHY R. Responsible innovation with digital platforms: cases in India and Canada[J]. Information systems journal, 2023, 33(1): 76-129. doi: 10.1111/isj.12378
    [27]
    ERIKSON J, LARSSON O L. How platforms facilitate collaboration across organizational boundaries: fighting human trafficking in Sweden[J]. Policy sciences, 2020, 53: 181-203. doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09371-6
    [28]
    ADNER R. Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of management, 2017, 43(1): 39-58. doi: 10.1177/0149206316678451
    [29]
    FURLAN A, CABIGIOSU A, CAMUFFO A. When the mirror gets misted up: modularity and technological change[J]. Strategic management journal, 2014, 35(6): 789-807. doi: 10.1002/smj.2138
    [30]
    NAMBISAN S. Platforms for collaboration[J]. Stanford social innovation review, 2009, 7(3): 44-49.
    [31]
    VAN DER HEIJDEN M, SCHALK J. Making good use of partners: differential effects of managerial networking in the social care domain[J]. International public management journal, 2018, 21(5): 729-759. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1199449
    [32]
    EISENHARDT K M, GRAEBNER M E. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of management journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
    [33]
    MARK N P. Status organizes cooperation: an evolutionary theory of status and social order[J]. American journal of sociology, 2018, 123(6): 1601-1634. doi: 10.1086/696683
    [34]
    HECHTER M. Principles of group solidarity[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987: 15-30.
    [35]
    黄其松. 数字时代的国家理论[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022, 322(10): 60-77.
    [36]
    陈天祥, 徐雅倩, 宋锴业, 等. 双向激活: 基层治理中的数字赋能——"越秀越有数"数字政府建设的经验启示[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4): 87-100. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/cn/article/id/3a9a41cc-a5dc-4a72-8455-72a968f531e1
    [37]
    LEVY K, CHASALOW K E, RILEY S. Algorithms and decision-making in the public sector[J]. Annual review of law and social science, 2021, 17: 309-334. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041221-023808
    [38]
    KIM S, ANDERSEN K N, LEE J. Platform government in the era of smart technology[J]. Public administration review, 2022, 82(2): 362-368. doi: 10.1111/puar.13422
    [39]
    林海彬. 治理空间生产: 人民政协参与社会治理的新路径——基于G市"有事好商量"平台的分析[J]. 探索, 2021(6): 93-102.
    [40]
    KLIJN E H, EDELENBOS J, STEIJN B. Trust in governance networks: its impacts on outcomes[J]. Administration & society, 2010, 42(2): 193-221.
    [41]
    ANSELL C, GASH A. Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy[J]. Journal of public administration research and theory, 2018, 28(1): 16-32. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mux030
    [42]
    OFE H A, SANDBERG J. The emergence of digital ecosystem governance: an investigation of responses to disrupted resource control in the Swedish public transport sector[J]. Information systems journal, 2022, 33(2): 350-384.
    [43]
    SANDBERG J, HOLMSTRÖM J, LYYTINEN K. Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: evidence from the process automation industry[J]. Management information systems quarterly, 2020, 44(1): 129-153. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2020/14520
    [44]
    COELHO T R, POZZEBON M, CUNHA M A. Citizens influencing public policy-making: resourcing as source of relational power in e-participation platforms[J]. Information systems journal, 2022, 32(2): 344-376. doi: 10.1111/isj.12359
    [45]
    THOMPSON M, VENTERS W. Platform, or technology project? A spectrum of six strategic 'plays' from UK government IT initiatives and their implications for policy[J]. Government information quarterly, 2021, 38(4): 101628. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101628
    [46]
    支振锋. 强化平台责任, 推动社会治理创新[N]. 光明日报, 2018-05-15(2).
    [47]
    MEI J, ZHENG G, ZHU L. Governance mechanisms implementation in the evolution of digital platforms: a case study of the Internet of Things platform[J]. R&D management, 2022, 52(3): 498-516.
    [48]
    沈费伟, 叶温馨. 基层政府数字治理的运作逻辑、现实困境与优化策略——基于"农事通""社区通""龙游通"数字治理平台的考察[J]. 管理学刊, 2020, 33(6): 26-35.
    [49]
    VALLAS S, SCHOR J B. What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy[J]. Annual review of sociology, 2020, 46: 273-294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
    [50]
    FREITAS M C, MIRA da SILVA M. GDPR Compliance in SMEs: there is much to be done[J]. Journal of information systems engineering & management, 2018, 3(4): 30.
    [51]
    LOGUE D, GRIMES M. Platforms for the people: enabling civic crowdfunding through the cultivation of institutional infrastructure[J]. Strategic management journal, 2022, 43(3): 663-693. doi: 10.1002/smj.3110
    [52]
    徐雅倩, 宋锴业. "数字企业家"如何促进中国数字公共服务创新?——基于三省十四市的实证研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2023, 20(3): 24-38.

Catalog

    Article views (86) PDF downloads (95) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return