• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
MA Shuzhong, SUN Rui, XIONG Lichun. The Mechanisms and Strategies of the Chinese Approach to a New Round of E-commerce Negotiations in the Context of Digital Trade[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (1): 104-115.
Citation: MA Shuzhong, SUN Rui, XIONG Lichun. The Mechanisms and Strategies of the Chinese Approach to a New Round of E-commerce Negotiations in the Context of Digital Trade[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (1): 104-115.

The Mechanisms and Strategies of the Chinese Approach to a New Round of E-commerce Negotiations in the Context of Digital Trade

More Information
  • Received Date: October 28, 2021
  • Available Online: February 17, 2022
  • In the field of international trade, the negotiation game between countries, regions and major international organizations has undergone a transition from traditional trade negotiations to e-commerce negotiations. The current international trade negotiations have focused on the field of digital trade. In the context of digital trade, the game over international trade rules is becoming more and more intense and China is the core promoter of the construction of new global rules for international trade negotiations and e-commerce negotiations. Therefore, it is necessary to strive to create a "Chinese-style template" based on its national conditions that is in line with China's digital trade development at the current stage. This empirical study selects 66 international e-commerce negotiation cases that China participated in and adopts the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to find out the necessary conditions for reaching an agreement in international e-commerce negotiations. Five condition configurations for achieving phased results are designed. It is suggested that China should accurately select negotiating parties, build an effective negotiation mechanism and quickly judge its own power on specific issues and the opportunity to contact the issues. Strategies such as improving domestic governance mechanism, strengthening global governance ability and transforming the advantage of cross-border e-commerce practice are proposed.
  • [1]
    石磊, 王舟. 当前全球数字贸易国际规则的新发展及中国的应对策略[J]. 价格月刊, 2021(10): 67-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JGYK202110010.htm
    [2]
    AARONSON S A. The digital trade imbalance and its implications for internet governance[J]. Global commission on internet governance, 2016, 25(6): 1-40.
    [3]
    张茉楠, 周念利. 数字贸易对全球多边贸易规则体系的挑战、趋势及中国对策[J]. 全球化, 2019(6): 32-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0675.2019.06.004
    [4]
    MELTZER J. Supporting the internet as a platform for international trade: opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises and developing countries[J/OL]. SSRN electronic journal, 2014. [2021-09-26]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400578.
    [5]
    SUSAN ARIEL AARONSON. The digital trade imbalance and its implications for internet governance[J]. Global commission on internet governence, 2016 (25): 1-40.
    [6]
    KOVENOCK D, THURSBY M. GATT, dispute settlement and cooperation[J]. 1992, 4(2): 151-170.
    [7]
    MAGGI G. The role of multilateral institutions in international trade cooperation[J]. The American economic review, 1999 (1), 190-214.
    [8]
    钟立国. WTO对区域贸易协定的规制及其完善[J]. 法学家, 2003(4): 151-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0221.2003.04.021
    [9]
    李杨, 陈寰琦, 周念利. 数字贸易规则"美式模板"对中国的挑战及应对[J]. 国际贸易, 2016(10): 24-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMY201610006.htm
    [10]
    KIM Y H. The optimal trade bargaining strategies in the negotiation of DDA[J]. Journal of policy modeling, 2004, 26(1): 65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2003.09.002
    [11]
    李春顶, 赵美英. 国际贸易争端解决机制的选择及有效性: 理论与中国抉择[J]. 财贸经济, 2011(5): 86-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CMJJ201105015.htm
    [12]
    陆燕. 国际贸易新规则: 重构的关键期[J]. 国际经济合作, 2014(8): 4-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJJH201408001.htm
    [13]
    杨毅. 国际贸易谈判的主要影响因素分析——国际政治经济学的视角[J]. 国际论坛, 2012, 14(2): 56-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJLT201202009.htm
    [14]
    石静霞. 数字经济背景下的WTO电子商务诸边谈判: 最新发展及焦点问题[J]. 东方法学, 2020(2): 170-184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1466.2020.02.015
    [15]
    柯静. WTO电子商务谈判与全球数字贸易规则走向[J]. 国际展望, 2020, 12(3): 43-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJZW202003003.htm
    [16]
    王秋雯. 国有企业规则在区域贸易谈判平台中的新发展与中国对策[J]. 国际贸易, 2018(6): 61-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GJMY201806012.htm
    [17]
    李连祺. 中美贸易谈判的权力结构与中国的策略选择[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2018, 27(5): 96-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DBYL201805012.htm
    [18]
    刘稚, 李致斐. 变革与突围: 谈判联盟形成与发展的内生逻辑探析[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2021(5): 103-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1369.2021.05.007
    [19]
    张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用: 定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.005
    [20]
    RAGIN C C, SEDZIAKA A A. QCA and fuzzy set applications to social movement research[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013: 1-6.
    [21]
    周舟. 国际谈判中的议题联系[J]. 东南亚研究, 2010(1): 64-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6099.2010.01.010
    [22]
    隆德新. 国际谈判中的"多议题联系双层博弈"——以英美贸易与货币谈判为例[J]. 太平洋学报, 2013, 21(10): 60-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8049.2013.10.005
    [23]
    何帆. 国际贸易谈判的政治经济分析: 一个初步的框架(6)[J]. 公共管理学报, 2004(1): 36-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6162.2004.01.007
    [24]
    胡鞍钢, 高宇宁, 郑云峰, 等. 大国兴衰与中国机遇: 国家综合国力评估[J]. 经济导刊, 2017(3): 14-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1160.2017.03.002
    [25]
    马飒, 张二震. RCEP框架下东亚区域产业链重构与中国对策[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(4): 19-30. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/article/id/5fc7ac77-4cd9-4d96-b2f5-4ef914bbb3f3
    [26]
    ARRINDELL W A. Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations: geert hofstede, sage publications, thousand oaks, california, 2001[J]. Behaviour research and therapy, 2003, 41(7): 861-862.
    [27]
    柴非. 双边FTA谈判中的经济分析方法和工具[D]. 上海: 上海社会科学院, 2009: 139-152.
    [28]
    FAN D, LI Y, CHEN L. Configuring innovative societies: the crossvergent role of cultural and institutional varieties[J]. Technovation, 2017(66-67): 43-56.

Catalog

    Article views (633) PDF downloads (129) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return