• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
LIU Jianjin, WEI Hailing, ZHANG Qian. Development of Pre-service Teachers' Competence of School-Family Partnerships and Its Validity and Reliability[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (5): 68-77.
Citation: LIU Jianjin, WEI Hailing, ZHANG Qian. Development of Pre-service Teachers' Competence of School-Family Partnerships and Its Validity and Reliability[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (5): 68-77.

Development of Pre-service Teachers' Competence of School-Family Partnerships and Its Validity and Reliability

More Information
  • Received Date: June 01, 2024
  • The aim of this study is to develop a scale of School-Family Partnerships Competence of Pre-service Teachers in primary and secondary schools. Based on reviewing relevant literature and consulting experts, the original scale was designed and revised multiple times. The reliability and validity of the scale were tested using correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale contained 21 items, including three dimensions (skills, knowledge, and attitude), which explained 67.438% of the variance variation; the factor load of each item ranges from 0.548 to 0.890; confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three factor structural model fitted well(2=488.296 df=186, RMSEA=0.074, CFI=0.915, TLI=0.904, SRMR=0.069); the total score and the scores of each factor were positively correlated with the score of Professional Identity and Professional Calling of normal university students (ICC=0.275~0.576, all p < 0.01). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total questionnaire and three factors ranges from 0.628 to 0.799; the retest reliability (ICC) ranges from 0.615 to 0.735. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire meet the requirements of psychometrics and can be used as a tool to evaluate the competence of school-family partnerships of pre-service teachers in primary and secondary schools.

  • [1]
    EPSTEIN J L. School, family, and community partnerships: preparing educators and improving schools[M]. Colorado: Westview Press, 2011.
    [2]
    MART A, DUSENBURY L, WEISSBERG R P. Social, emotional, and academic learning: complementary goals for school-family partnerships[M]//Handbook on family and community engagement. Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing, 2011: 37-44.
    [3]
    ATKINS M S, FRAZIER S L, BIRMAN D, et al. School-based mental health services for children living in high poverty urban communities[J]. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 2006, 33: 146-159. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0031-9
    [4]
    吴重涵, 张俊. 制度化家校合作的国际比较: 政策、学校行动与研究支撑[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2019(11): 31-38.
    [5]
    吴重涵, 王梅雾, 张俊. 教育跨界行动的制度化特征——对家校合作的经验分析[J]. 教育研究, 2017(11): 81-90.
    [6]
    张俊, 吴重涵, 王梅雾. 家长和教师参与家校合作的跨界行为研究——基于交叠影响域理论的经验模型[J]. 教育发展研究, 2018(38): 78-84.
    [7]
    马忠虎. 基础教育新概念: 家校合作[M]. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 1999: 158-159.
    [8]
    KHONG L Y L, NG P T. School-parent partnerships in Singapore[J]. Educational research for policy and practice, 2005(4): 1-11.
    [9]
    BROWN A L, HARRIS M, JACOBSON A, et al. Parent teacher education connection: preparing preservice teachers for family engagement[J]. The teacher educator, 2014, 49(2): 133-151. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2014.887169
    [10]
    NATHANS L, BROWN A. Factor analysis of the attitude toward parent involvement survey with preservice teachers[J]. Sage open, 2021, 11(3): 1-11.
    [11]
    GARTMEIER M, GEBHARDT M, DOTGERB. How do teachers evaluate their parent communication competence? Latent profiles and relationships to workplace behaviors[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2016, 55: 207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.009
    [12]
    SHARTRAND A M, WEISS H B, KREIDER H M, et al. New skills for new schools: preparing teachers in family involvement[R]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard graduate school of education, 1997.
    [13]
    KIRSCHENBAUM H. Educating professionals for school, family, and community partnerships[M]//Promising practices for family involvement in schools (Vol. 1). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, 2001: 185-208.
    [14]
    张俊, 吴重涵, 王梅雾. 合作的力量: 家校合作调查报告[M]. 南昌: 江西教育出版社, 2018: 50.
    [15]
    袁柯曼, 周欣然, 叶攀琴. 中小学教师家校合作胜任力模型研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(6): 98-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2021.06.013
    [16]
    ASSEN J H E, KOOPS H, MEIJERS F, et al. How can a dialogue support teachers' professional identity development? Harmonising multiple teacher Ⅰ-positions[J]. Teaching and teacher education, 2018, 73: 130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.019
    [17]
    刘铖, 陈鹏. 教师成长内生动力的异化与重建——基于现代性危机的视角[J]. 教师教育论坛, 2021, 34(12): 21-24.
    [18]
    李岩. 特殊教育教师职业认同与工作投入的关系研究[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2018(8): 11-17.
    [19]
    董元吉, 周月华, 刘成, 等. 组织支持感对高校辅导员职业能力的影响——职业认同的中介作用[J]. 教育理论与实践, 2024, 44(3): 38-42.
    [20]
    胡莹莹, 刘一璇, 李娜, 等. 中小学教师品格优势对工作投入的影响: 职业使命感的中介作用[J]. 当代教育科学, 2021(9): 80-87.
    [21]
    陈鸿飞, 谢宝国, 郭钟泽, 等. 职业使命感与免费师范生学业投入的关系: 基于社会认知职业理论的视角[J]. 心理科学, 2016(3): 659-665.
    [22]
    袁琳, 郑家福, 侯永青. 师范生职业使命感对学习投入的影响: 职业认同的中介作用和心理资本的调节作用[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 48(6): 218-227.
    [23]
    王鑫强, 曾丽红, 张大均, 等. 师范生职业认同感量表的初步编制[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2010(36): 152-157.
    [24]
    张春雨. 职业使命感: 结构、测量及其与幸福的联系[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2015: 33.
    [25]
    王济川, 王小倩, 姜宝法. 结构方程模型: 方法与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011: 43-44.
    [26]
    吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011: 237.
    [27]
    张伟豪, 卓英洁, 苏荣海. 论文写作不求人: SPSS数据分析指南[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2021: 144-145.

Catalog

    Article views (77) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return