• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
ZHANG Weikun. Collaborative Symbiosis: The Inheritance Logic and Development Trend of the Concept of Grassroots Social Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (4): 123-134.
Citation: ZHANG Weikun. Collaborative Symbiosis: The Inheritance Logic and Development Trend of the Concept of Grassroots Social Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (4): 123-134.

Collaborative Symbiosis: The Inheritance Logic and Development Trend of the Concept of Grassroots Social Governance

More Information
  • Received Date: February 28, 2021
  • Available Online: August 09, 2022
  • The Chinese society has contributed Chinese wisdom and Chinese solution regarding modern grassroots governance in the global context. In the specific practice of advocating a "community with a shared future for mankind" and "common prosperity", the "people-centered" community value orientation and the symbiotic relationship of grassroots people are the practical cognition and factual description of the grassroots social governance in the new era, which has achieved transcendence over the Chinese traditional people-oriented thinking and the western individual liberalism values. The reshaping and transcendence are mainly reflected on the dimensions from chaos to order, from linear logic to compound governance, and from individual thinking to community concept.
  • [1]
    郭亮. 家国关系: 理解近代以来中国基层治理变迁的一个视角[J]. 学术月刊, 2021(5): 96-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WKJY202201007.htm
    [2]
    陈仁仁. 试论传统民本思想的内涵与困境[J]. 现代哲学, 2020(5): 134-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDZI202005017.htm
    [3]
    林尚立. 论人民民主[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 107.
    [4]
    徐鸿武, 郑曙村, 宋世明. 当代西方民主思潮评介[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2000: 61.
    [5]
    本杰明·巴伯. 强势民主[M]. 彭斌, 译. 长春: 吉林人民出版社, 2011: 5.
    [6]
    尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 在事实与规范之间[M]. 童世骏, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2014: 32.
    [7]
    尤尔根·哈贝马斯. 交往行为理论[M]. 曹卫东, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2018: 8.
    [8]
    李兵, 郭天一. 话语共识与社会多元性整合——哈贝马斯审议民主理论探析[J]. 思想战线, 2019 (1): 78-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXZX201901010.htm
    [9]
    理查德·博克斯. 公民治理——引领21世纪的美国社区[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013: 137-138.
    [10]
    MATIN R, SUNLEY P. Slow convergence: the new endogenous growth theory and regional development[J]. Economic geography, 2018, 74: 201-227.
    [11]
    李友梅. 当代中国社会治理转型的经验逻辑[J]. 中国社会科学, 2018(11): 58-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK201811006.htm
    [12]
    STANK T, SCOTT S, HAZEN B. A savvy guide to the digital supply chain[R]. The global supply chain institute white papers, 2018: 1-56.
    [13]
    陈天祥, 王莹. 软嵌入: 基层社会治理中政府行为与文化共同体的契合逻辑[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5): 57-69. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/article/id/385e2f54-d359-4175-a36d-0755597387a0
    [14]
    孙超群. 基层治理的复合转向: 一种面向复杂社会样态的治理逻辑[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2022(3): 44-51.
    [15]
    K. 米切姆, 孙烨. 复杂性的交互作用: 科学、技术、社会与伦理[J]. 世界哲学, 2013(1): 104-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYC201301012.htm
    [16]
    陈世香, 苏建健. 复合治理、发生机制与创新策略: 城市街区公共文化服务模式创新的个案分析[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2018(3): 66-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FBSF201803010.htm
    [17]
    白浩然, 李敏, 刘奕伶. 复合治理: 地方脱贫进路的一个理论解释——基于153个脱贫摘帽县的扎根研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2020(1): 22-40. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ202001004.htm
    [18]
    袁祖社. 人类"共同价值"的理念及其伦理正当性之思——"共同体"逻辑的意义及其内在限度[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(4): 60-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKXB201704007.htm
    [19]
    马克思恩格斯文集, 第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009.
    [20]
    赵坤. 现代个体与共同体关系重建的前提及其中国智慧[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(5): 21-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCDZ202005005.htm

Catalog

    Article views (364) PDF downloads (96) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return