| Citation: |
FANG Yanhong, YIN Guanhai, ZHANG Jijia. Roles of Situational Goal and Ad hoc Association on Semantic Effect in Picture-Word Interference Paradigm[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (3): 94-105.
|
It is a well-established finding that the semantic relations between the distractors and the targets have a great influence on the semantic effect during language production. The roles of situational goal and ad hoc association were explored in a picture-word interference paradigm. Results showed there were both similarity and difference between the roles of ad hoc relation and other semantic relations. Compared with unrelated distractor words, ad hoc associative distractor words slowed the latencies of picture naming and led to semantic interference effect. But the interference effect caused by ad hoc association was not stable and depended on whether there was situational goal. Ad hoc association effect was observed when the situational goal was available and disappeared when there was no situational goal. The results also showed that the ad hoc association effect appeared at the early stage of SOA. These findings were interpreted in terms of lexical cohort account, a representative model of lexical competition. Implications for nature of semantic effects in different semantic context were discussed.
| [1] |
GAUVIN H S, JONEN M K, CHOI J, et al. No lexical competition without priming: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2018(12): 1-9.
|
| [2] |
方燕红, 张积家. 图-词干扰范式下语义效应的理论及争论[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011(2): 120-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB201102024.htm
|
| [3] |
DHOOGE E, BAENE W D, HARTSUIKER R J. A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: evidence from event-related potentials[J]. Brain and language, 2013, 124(3): 232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.005
|
| [4] |
RAHMAN A R, MELINGER A. Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: a rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza[J]. Language and cognitive process, 2009, 24(5): 749-760. doi: 10.1080/01690960802648491
|
| [5] |
ZHANG Y Y, MIRMAN D, HOFFMAN P. Taxonomic and thematic relations rely on different types of semantic features: evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis and a semantic priming study[J]. Brain and language, 2023, 242: 1-12.
|
| [6] |
GARRETT H, KURTZ K J. Similarity is as similarity does? A critical inquiry into the effect of thematic association on similarity[J]. Cognition, 2023, 186: 115-138.
|
| [7] |
LUCARIELLO J, NELSON K. Slot-filler categories as memory organizers for young children[J]. Developmental psychology, 1985, 21(2): 272-282. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.272
|
| [8] |
BARSALOU L W. Ad hoc categories[J]. Memory and cognition, 1983, 11: 211. doi: 10.3758/BF03196968
|
| [9] |
王娟, 张积家. Ad hoc类别研究: 理论与价值[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2009(2): 120-125. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSB200902024.htm
|
| [10] |
PYTHON G, FARGIER R, LANANARO M. ERP evidence of distinct processes underlying semantic facilitation and interference in word production[J]. Cortex, 2018, 99: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.008
|
| [11] |
SCALTRITTI M, NAVARRETE E, PERESSOTTI F. Distributional analyses in the picture-word interference paradigm: exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects[J]. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2015, 68(7): 1348-1369. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.981196
|
| [12] |
STARREVELD P A, HEIJ W L. Picture-word interference is a Stroop effect: a theoretical analysis and new empirical finding[J]. Psychonomic bulletin review, 2017, 24(3): 721-733. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1167-6
|
| [13] |
HANTSCH A, JESCHENIAK J D, MÄDEBACH A. Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm[J]. Me-mory and cognition, 2012, 40(5): 760-768. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0184-6
|
| [14] |
方燕红, 张积家. 语义相似性与类别大小对图-词干扰范式下语义效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 523-537. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB201305007.htm
|
| [15] |
SAILOR K, BROOKS P J, BRUENING P R, et al. Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture-word interference task[J]. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2009, 62(4): 789-801. doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383
|
| [16] |
ALARIO F X, SEGUI J, FERRAND L. Semantic and associative priming in picture naming[J]. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology section a, 2000, 53(3): 741-764. doi: 10.1080/713755907
|
| [17] |
EMMOREY K, MOTT M, MEADE G, et al. Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference[J]. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2021(7): 1-15.
|
| [18] |
NOZARI N, HEPNER C R. To select or to wait? The importance of criterion setting in debates of competitive lexical selection[J]. Cognitive neuropsychology, 2018(36): 1-15.
|
| [19] |
FANG Y H, ZHANG J J, YIN G H, et al. Typicality effects in picture-word interference: an evaluation of response exclusion hypothesis[J]. Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2015, 56(3): 245-253. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12197
|
| [20] |
桂诗春. 新编心理语言学[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000: 328-329.
|
| [21] |
SANDBERG C, SEBASTIAN R, KIRAN S. Typicality mediates performance during category verification in both ad-hoc and well-defined categories[J]. Journal of communication disordrs, 2012, 45(2): 69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.12.004
|
| [22] |
舒华, 程元善, 张厚粲. 235图形的命名一致性、熟悉性、表象一致性和视觉复杂性评定[J]. 心理学报, 1989(4): 389-396. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB198904007.htm
|
| [23] |
PIAI V, KNIGHT R T. Lexical selection with competing distractors: evidence from left temporal lobe lesions[J]. Psychonomic bulletin and review, 2017, 25(2): 710-717.
|
| [24] |
RAHMAN A R, ALISSA M. Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network[J]. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 2019(9): 1-17.
|
| [25] |
LITTLE D R, LEWANDOWSKY S, HEIT E. Ad hoc category restructuring[J]. Memory and cognition, 2006, 34(7): 1398-1413. doi: 10.3758/BF03195905
|
| [26] |
SAILOR K, BROOKS P J, BRUENING P R, et al. Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture-word interference task[J]. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2009, 62(4): 789-801. doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383
|
| [27] |
STEFANIE A, KATHARINA D, RUTH B, et al. The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm[J]. Neuroimage, 2009, 44(3): 1113-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.018
|
| [28] |
张清芳, 杨玉芳. 汉语词汇产生中词汇选择和音韵编码之间的交互作用[J]. 心理学报, 2006(4): 480-488. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200604001.htm
|
| [29] |
COLLINS A M, LOFTUS E F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing[J]. Psychological review, 1975, 82(6): 407-428. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
|
| [30] |
方燕红, 张积家. 汉字词和图片命名与分类的比较[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(22): 114-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200902005.htm
|
| [31] |
周晓林, 庄捷, 吴佳音, 等. 汉语词汇产生中音、形、义三种信息激活的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2003(6): 712-718. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200306001.htm
|
| [32] |
GIEZEN M R, EMMOREY K. Language co-activation and lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: evidence from picture-word interference[J]. Bilingualism: language and cognition, 2016(2): 1-13.
|
| [33] |
BELKE E, MEYER A S, DAMIAN M F. Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm[J]. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology section a, 2005, 58 (4): 667-692. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142
|
| [34] |
RAHMAN A R, MELINGER A. When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production[J]. Journal of experimental psychology, 2007, 33(3): 604-614.
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: