The Differentiation of Law Enforcement Forms in the Framework of Discourse: Law Enforcement Compromise or Law Enforcement Conflict

CHEN Tianxiang; LÜ Zhong

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (5): 17-30.

CHEN Tianxiang, LÜ Zhong. The Differentiation of Law Enforcement Forms in the Framework of Discourse: Law Enforcement Compromise or Law Enforcement Conflict[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (5): 17-30.

Citation:

PDF (1030 KB)

The Differentiation of Law Enforcement Forms in the Framework of Discourse: Law Enforcement Compromise or Law Enforcement Conflict

CHEN Tianxiang^{1, 2},
LÜ Zhong^1, ,

More Information

Received Date: May 04, 2022
Available Online: November 14, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The compromise phenomenon of grass-roots law enforcement is studied and an interpretative framework of field structure-discourse system-law enforcement variation is constructed through case study, presenting a specific mechanism of law enforcement of grassroots urban management. It is found that the three sets of discourse systems full of tension in the transformation of Chinese society have aggravated the difficulty for the law enforcement to stably maintain the interactive framework of a rational legal discourse, thereby creating possibilities for diversified forms of law enforcement. When forces of urban management law enforcement can continue to incorporate administrative counterparts into the interactive system of rational legal discourse, the form of law enforcement is predictable. When moral public opinion mechanisms, law enforcement risk mechanisms and political accountability mechanisms exist and work independently or cooperatively, there will be a switch from a rational legal discourse system to an ethical political ideological discourse system and may result in law enforcement compromise. Conversely, if law enforcement entities lack sufficient law enforcement capabilities to maintain the stability of the interactive framework of the rational legal discourse and lack sufficient external pressure to promote their transformation to alternative discourse system frameworks, law enforcement confrontation will more likely result in law enforcement conflicts. A more comprehensive understanding of the grassroots law enforcement is presented by incorporating law enforcement, law enforcement conflicts and law enforcement compromises into a unified interpretative framework.
- grassroots law enforcement,
- law enforcement compromise,
- law enforcement conflict,
- discourse system

FullText(HTML)

References (34)

References

[1]	道格·桑德斯. 落脚城市: 最后的人类大迁徙与我们的未来[M]. 陈信宏, 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2014: 327.
[2]	ZANG X, PRATT J. Are street-level bureaucrats in China hardnosed cops or consultants? An institutional account of policing behavior in autocracy[J]. Journal of contemporary china, 2019, 28(116): 232-244. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1511394
[3]	WANG Y, MINZNER C. The rise of the Chinese security state[J]. The China quarterly, 2015, 222: 339-359. doi: 10.1017/S0305741015000430
[4]	吕德文. 灰色治理与城市暴力再生产——鲁磨路"城管"实践的机制分析[J]. 开放时代, 2015(4): 158-182. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KFSD201504012.htm
[5]	魏程琳. 准街头管理者的结构与功能——以城管部门协管员为例[J]. 青年研究, 2017(2): 38-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QNYJ201702005.htm
[6]	BENNEY J. Weiwen at the grassroots: China's stability maintenance apparatus as a means of conflict resolution[J]. Journal of contemporary china, 2016, 25(99): 389-405. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2015.1104876
[7]	陈柏峰. 城镇规划区违建执法困境及其解释——国家能力的视角[J]. 法学研究, 2015, 37(1): 20-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS201501003.htm
[8]	陈天祥, 齐卓, 王国颖. 相对集中行政处罚权制度改革何以困难重重?——基于制度成本视角的分析[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2019(1): 103-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2019.01.015
[9]	李利军. 城管行政强制权研究——兼对《行政强制法》的立法建议[J]. 中国行政管理, 2009(12): 16-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXGL200912006.htm
[10]	贺欣. 在法律的边缘——部分外地来京工商户经营执照中的"法律合谋"[J]. 中国社会科学, 2005(3): 91-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200503009.htm
[11]	刘磊. 街头政治的形成: 城管执法困境之分析[J]. 法学家, 2015(4): 31-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXJA201504004.htm
[12]	陈柏峰. 党政体制如何塑造基层执法[J]. 法学研究, 2017, 39(4): 191-208. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS201704011.htm
[13]	海德格尔. 诗·语言·思[M]. 彭富春, 译. 北京: 文化艺术出版社, 1990: 187.
[14]	米歇尔·福柯. 福柯文选Ⅱ[M]. 汪民安, 译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016: 116-117.
[15]	HARRITS G S. Stereotypes in context: how and when do street‐level bureaucrats use class stereotypes?[J]. Public administration review, 2019, 79(1): 93-103.
[16]	唐世平. 观念、行动和结果: 社会科学的客体和任务[J]. 世界经济与政治, 2018(5): 33-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJZ201805003.htm
[17]	甘阳. 通三统[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2007: 23.
[18]	王婷, 张平. 论行政执法和解的风险控制——以反垄断法等特殊执法领域为视角[J]. 政法学刊, 2015, 32(6): 22-29.
[19]	方世荣, 白云锋. 行政执法和解的模式及其运用[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(5): 83-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS201905005.htm
[20]	李猛. 理性化及其传统: 对韦伯的中国观察[J]. 社会学研究, 2010, 25(5): 1-30. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201005002.htm
[21]	朱苏力. 送法下乡: 中国基层司法制度硏究[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 54.
[22]	江必新. 正确认识司法与政治的关系[J]. 求是, 2009(24): 51-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QUSI200924020.htm
[23]	吕忠. 理解中国科层制行为: 基于既有文献的分析[J]. 社会主义研究, 2019(2): 69-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZY201902010.htm
[24]	费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 41-43.
[25]	韩志明. 街头官僚的空间阐释——基于工作界面的比较分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 63(4): 583-591. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSLD201004017.htm
[26]	欧阳静. 政治统合制及其运行基础——以县域治理为视角[J]. 开放时代, 2019(2): 184-198. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KFSD201902014.htm
[27]	吕普生, 吕忠. 中国基层执法中的相机选择: 从策略赋权到话语使用[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(2): 78-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXGL202002018.htm
[28]	吕普生. 中国行政执法体制改革40年: 演进、挑战及走向[J]. 福建行政学院学报, 2018(6): 12-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FZFZ201806005.htm
[29]	艾伯特·赫希曼. 退出、呼吁与忠诚: 对企业、组织和国家衰退的回应[M]. 卢昌崇, 译. 经济科学出版社, 2001: 译者序.
[30]	加里·格尔茨, 詹姆斯·马奥尼. 两种传承: 社会科学中的定性与定量研究[M]. 刘军, 译. 上海: 格致出版社, 2016: 14.
[31]	陈柏峰. 基层社会的弹性执法及其后果[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2015, 21(5): 154-167. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SFAS201505033.htm
[32]	何艳玲. 中国土地执法摇摆现象及其解释[J]. 法学研究, 2013, 35(6): 61-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS201306010.htm
[33]	陈那波, 卢施羽. 场域转换中的默契互动——中国"城管"的自由裁量行为及其逻辑[J]. 管理世界, 2013(10): 62-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201310008.htm
[34]	任剑涛. 拜谒诸神: 西方政治理论与方法寻踪[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2014: 37.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (306) PDF downloads (189)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Differentiation of Law Enforcement Forms in the Framework of Discourse: Law Enforcement Compromise or Law Enforcement Conflict

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content