• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
ZHANG Guanglei, HU Ting, CHEN Silu. The Dual-concern Model of Human Resources Practice and the Employee Performance: The Differential Role of Leader-Member Exchange[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (6): 89-104.
Citation: ZHANG Guanglei, HU Ting, CHEN Silu. The Dual-concern Model of Human Resources Practice and the Employee Performance: The Differential Role of Leader-Member Exchange[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (6): 89-104.

The Dual-concern Model of Human Resources Practice and the Employee Performance: The Differential Role of Leader-Member Exchange

More Information
  • Received Date: May 12, 2021
  • Available Online: January 05, 2022
  • The influence of the dual-concern model of human resources (HR) practice (maintenance and performance) on employee performance and the moderate role of HR management strength is analyzed in terms of the social exchange theory through a questionnaire survey of 331 employees from Wuhan, Chongqing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. The main conclusions are as follows. Social leader-member exchange (SLMX) mediates the relationship between performance-oriented HR practice and employees' in-role performance and extra-role performance; economic leader-member exchange (ELMX) mediates the relationship between maintenance-oriented HR practice and employees' in-role performance and extra-role performance; human resource management strength not only positively moderates the relationship between performance-oriented HR practice and social leader-member exchange but also positively moderates the mediating mechanism of performance-oriented HR practice, SLMX and extra-role performance.
  • [1]
    KORFF J, BIEMANN T, VOELPEL S C. Differentiating HR systems' impact: moderating effects of age on the HR system-work outcome association[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2017, 38(3): 415-438. doi: 10.1002/job.2130
    [2]
    陈汇. 顾此失彼: 人力资源实践的矛盾性对员工行为的影响[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018: 7-10.
    [3]
    VAN BEURDEN J, VAN VELDHOVEN M, VAN DE VOORDE K. When are HR practices effective for job performance? The role of employee HR effectiveness ratings[C]//Academy of management proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of management, 2018, 2018(1): 14185.
    [4]
    NISHII L H, LEPAK D P, SCHNEIDER B. Employee attributions of the "Why" of HR practices: their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction[J]. Personnel psychology, 2008, 61(3): 503-545. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00121.x
    [5]
    HAN J H, LIAO H, TAYLOR M S, et al. Effects of high-performance work systems on transformational leadership and team performance: investigating the moderating roles of organizational orientations[J]. Human resource management, 2018, 57(5): 1065-1082. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21886
    [6]
    HONG Y, JIANG Y, LIAO H, et al. High performance work systems for service quality: boundary conditions and influence processes[J]. Human resource management, 2017, 56(5): 747-767. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21801
    [7]
    张正堂, 李瑞. 企业高绩效工作系统的内容结构与测量[J]. 管理世界, 2015(5): 100-116. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201505012.htm
    [8]
    DEN HARTOG D N, BOON C, VERBURG R M, et al. HRM, communication, satisfaction, and perceived performance: a cross-level test[J]. Journal of management, 2013, 39(6): 1637-1665. doi: 10.1177/0149206312440118
    [9]
    DING D Z, LAN G, WARNER M. A new form of Chinese human resource management? Personnel and labour-management relations in Chinese township and village enterprises: a case-study approach[J]. Industrial relations journal, 2010, 32(4): 328-343. doi: 10.1111/1468-2338.00202
    [10]
    ZHU CHERRIE JIUHUA, BRIAN COOPER, HELEN DE CIERI, et al. A problematic transition to a strategic role: human resource management in industrial enterprises in China[J]. International journal of human resource management, 2005, 16(4): 513-531. doi: 10.1080/09585190500051514
    [11]
    GONG Y, LAW K S, CHANG S, et al. Human resources management and firm performance: the differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94(1): 263-75. doi: 10.1037/a0013116
    [12]
    KATZ D, KAHN R L. The social psychology of organizations[M]. New York: Wiley, 1978: 10.
    [13]
    LIU J, LEE C, HUI C, et al. Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: the mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2013, 98(5): 832. doi: 10.1037/a0032571
    [14]
    JACKSON S E, SCHULER R S, JIANG K. An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management[J]. Academy of management annals, 2014, 8(1): 1-56. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2014.872335
    [15]
    吕霄, 樊耘, 张婕, 等. 前摄型人格对角色内绩效的影响: 个性化交易和员工创新行为的作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(8): 170-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXXG201608015.htm
    [16]
    戚振江, 朱纪平. 人力资源组合策略理论及其研究进展[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(1): 184-189. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXXG201001038.htm
    [17]
    苗仁涛, 周文霞, 刘军, 等. 高绩效工作系统对员工行为的影响: 一个社会交换及程序公平的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2013(5): 38-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2013.05.005
    [18]
    SIKORA D M, FERRIS G R, VAN IDDEKINGE C H. Line manager implementation perceptions as a mediator of relations between high-performance work practices and employee outcomes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2015, 100(6): 1908. doi: 10.1037/apl0000024
    [19]
    王雅静. 高绩效工作系统对员工工作效能的影响研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2014: 10-11.
    [20]
    KUVAAS B, BUCH R, DYSVIK A, et al. Economic and social leader-member exchange relationships and follower performance[J]. The leadership quarterly, 2012, 23(5): 756-765. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.013
    [21]
    BERG S T S, GRIMSTAD A, ŠKERLAVAJ M, et al. Social and economic leader-member exchange and employee creative behavior: the role of employee willingness to take risks and emotional carrying capacity[J]. European management journal, 2017, 35(5): 676-687. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.08.002
    [22]
    CERNE M, BABIC K, CONNELLY C E, et al. Team-level knowledge hiding, social leader-member exchange, and prosocial motivation[C]//Academy of management proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of management, 2015(1): 16302.
    [23]
    DYSVIK A, BUCH R, KUVAAS B. Knowledge donating and knowledge collecting: the moderating roles of social and economic LMX[J]. Leadership & organization development journal, 2015(36): 35-53. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0145
    [24]
    唐贵瑶, 魏立群, 贾建锋. 人力资源管理强度研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013, 35(4): 40-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJG201304004.htm
    [25]
    BOWEN D E, OSTROFF C. Understanding HRM-Firm performance linkages: the role of the strength of the HRM system[J]. Academy of management review, 2004, 29(2): 203-221. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cheri_Ostroff/publication/234021376_Understanding_HRM-Firm_Performance_Linkages_The_Role_of_the_Strength_of_the_HRM_System/links/56306d8908ae01bbaedd50cd.pdf
    [26]
    BLAU P M. Social mobility and interpersonal relations[J]. American sociological review, 1956, 21(3): 290-295. doi: 10.2307/2089282
    [27]
    朱飞, 章婕璇, 朱曦济. 人力资源管理强度影响服务导向组织公民行为的实证研究——组织承诺的中介作用和象征性雇主品牌的调节作用[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2020(12): 106-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCY202012010.htm
    [28]
    魏巍, 彭纪生. 绩效导向、稳定导向人力资源实践对员工创造力的影响[J]. 财贸研究, 2018, 29(7): 102-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CMYJ201807009.htm
    [29]
    LIU D, GONG Y, ZHOU J, et al. Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership[J]. Academy of management journal, 2017, 60(3): 1164-1188. doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.0230
    [30]
    魏巍, 彭纪生. 人力资源管理系统构型差异性、组织心理所有权与员工创造力[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2018(1): 27-36. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYJG201801004.htm
    [31]
    DULEBOHN J H, BOMMER W H, LIDEN R C, et al. A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: integrating the past with an eye toward the future[J]. Journal of management, 2012, 38(6): 1715-1759. doi: 10.1177/0149206311415280
    [32]
    BERNERTH J B, ARMENAKIS A A, FEILD H S, et al. Leader-member social exchange (LMSX): development and validation of a scale[J]. Journal of organizational behavior: the international journal of industrial, occupational and organizational psychology and behavior, 2007, 28(8): 979-1003. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=27180698&site=ehost-live
    [33]
    MATTA F K, VAN DYNE L. Leader-member exchange and performance: where we are and where we go from here[J]. The Oxford handbook of leader-member exchange, 2015: 157-174.
    [34]
    SHORE L M, TETRICK L E, LYNCH P, et al. Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation[J]. Journal of applied social psychology, 2006, 36(4): 837-867. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00046.x
    [35]
    LAI L, ROUSSEAU D M, CHANG K T T. Idiosyncratic deals: coworkers as interested third parties[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94(2): 547. doi: 10.1037/a0013506
    [36]
    ILIES R, NAHRGANG J D, MORGESON F P. Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2007, 92(1): 269. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
    [37]
    KUVAAS B, DYSVIK A. Permanent employee investment and social exchange and psychological cooperative climate among temporary employees[J]. Economic and industrial democracy, 2011, 32(2): 261-283. doi: 10.1177/0143831X10371990
    [38]
    JIWEN SONG L, TSUI A S, LAW K S. Unpacking employee responses to organizational exchange mechanisms: the role of social and economic exchange perceptions[J]. Journal of management, 2009, 35(1): 56-93. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321544
    [39]
    INNOCENTI L, PILATI M, PELUSO A M. Trust as moderator in the relationship between HRM practices and employee attitudes[J]. Human resource management journal, 2011, 21(3): 303-317. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00151.x
    [40]
    ASELAGE J, EISENBERGER R. Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration[J]. Journal of organizational behavior: the international journal of industrial, occupational and organizational psychology and behavior, 2003, 24(5): 491-509.
    [41]
    BLAU P. Exchange and power in social life[M]. Routledge, 2017: 232-241.
    [42]
    SINCLAIR R R, TUCKER J S, CULLEN J C, et al. Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2005, 90(6): 1280. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1280
    [43]
    MEYER J P, STANLEY D J, HERSCOVITCH L, et al. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences[J]. Journal of vocational behavior, 2002, 61(1): 20-52. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
    [44]
    贾建锋, 周舜怡, 唐贵瑶. 人力资源管理强度的研究回顾及在中国情境下的理论框架建构[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2017(10): 6-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4124.2017.10.002
    [45]
    DELMOTTE J, DE WINNE S, SELS L. Toward an assessment of perceived HRM system strength: scale development and validation[J]. The international journal of human resource management, 2012, 23(7): 1481-1506. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.579921
    [46]
    CHEN S, LIN P, LU C, et al. The moderation effect of HR strength on the relationship between employee commitment and job performance [J]. Social behavior and personality: an international journal, 2007, 35(8): 1121-1138. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2007.35.8.1121
    [47]
    PICCOLO R F, COLQUITT J A. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics[J]. Academy of management journal, 2006, 49(2): 327-340. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.20786079
    [48]
    WILLIAMS L J, ANDERSON S E. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors[J]. Journal of management, 1991, 17(3): 601-617. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305
    [49]
    VAN SCOTTER J R, MOTOWIDLO S J. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1996, 81(5): 525. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525
    [50]
    王辉, 李晓轩, 罗胜强. 任务绩效与情境绩效二因素绩效模型的验证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003(4): 80-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGK200304016.htm
    [51]
    WRIGHT P M, BOSWELL W R. Desegregating HRM: a review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research[J]. Journal of management, 2002, 28(3): 247-276. doi: 10.1177/014920630202800302
    [52]
    JIANG K, LEPAK D P, HU J, BAER J C. How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms[J]. Academy of management journal, 2012, 55(6): 1264-1294. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0088
    [53]
    KUVAAS B, BUCH R. Leader-member exchange relationships and follower outcomes: the mediating role of perceiving goals as invariable[J]. Human resource management, 2018, 57(1): 235-248. doi: 10.1002/hrm.21826
    [54]
    BUCH R, MARTINSEN Ø L, KUVAAS B. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior: the mediating role of economic leader-member exchange relationships[J]. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 2014b, 22(1): 115-124. http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30812566.pdf
    [55]
    GILBERT C, DE WINNE S, SELS L. The influence of line managers and HR department on employees' affective commitment[J]. The international journal of human resource management, 2011, 22(8): 1618-1637. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2011.565646
    [56]
    GERSTNER C R, DAY D V. Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1997, 82(6): 827. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827
    [57]
    PANACCIO A, VANDENBERGHE C. The relationships of role clarity and organization-based self-esteem to commitment to supervisors and organizations and turnover intentions[J]. Journal of applied social psychology, 2011, 41(6): 1455-1485. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00764.x
    [58]
    KUVAAS B, BUCH R. Leader self-efficacy and role ambiguity and follower leader-member exchange[J]. Leadership & organization development journal, 2019, 41(1): 118-132. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0209

Catalog

    Article views (802) PDF downloads (155) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return