• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
XIONG Ming, CHEN Shuyuan. Jump Liars and Boolean Paradoxes[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (1): 198-204.
Citation: XIONG Ming, CHEN Shuyuan. Jump Liars and Boolean Paradoxes[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (1): 198-204.

Jump Liars and Boolean Paradoxes

More Information
  • Received Date: August 18, 2021
  • Available Online: February 17, 2022
  • The n-jump liar, being the generalization of the liar paradox, is a paradox whose sentences change their truth values every n points in any relational frame. It is proved that whenever n>1, then the n-jump liars cannot be represented by any Boolean paradox owing to the semantic closeness of the Boolean paradoxes. However, for any number n, we can construct a Boolean paradox, that is, the so-called weak n-jump liar, satisfying the condition for the n-jump liar in some weak sense. These results provide a partial solution to the definability problem of the n-jump liar.
  • [1]
    HSIUNG M. Jump liars and jourdain's card via the relativized T-scheme[J]. Studia logica, 2009, 91(2): 239-271. doi: 10.1007/s11225-009-9174-5
    [2]
    熊明. 塔斯基定理与真理论悖论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 145.
    [3]
    HSIUNG M. Boolean paradoxes and revision periods[J]. Studia logica, 2017, 105(5): 881-914.
    [4]
    熊明. 说谎者悖论的恶性循环[J]. 哲学研究, 2008 (11): 109-115+129. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXYJ200811014.htm
    [5]
    GUPTA A. Truth and paradox[J]. Journal of philosophical logic, 1982, 11(1): 1-60.
    [6]
    HERZBERGER H. Notes on naive semantics[J]. Journal of philosophical logic, 1982, 11(1): 61-102. doi: 10.1007/BF00302339
    [7]
    GUPTA A, BELNAP N. The revision theory of truth[M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993: 167-168.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 李玲玲,王晓嘟,梁晶晶. “第一学历”真的那么重要吗?——基于2011—2023年两院院士的实证分析. 中国科技论坛. 2025(01): 130-139 .
    2. 赵乾. 基层考核政治中的差异化激励:基于“信号传递—意见领袖”的解释. 天津行政学院学报. 2025(01): 55-65 .
    3. 吕笠瞻,戴枫. 以文促旅:受教育程度如何影响农村家庭旅游支出?. 世界农业. 2025(02): 93-105 .
    4. 孙友鹏,阚维. 我国基础教育减负研究的知识图景与演进展望(2010—2022年)——基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析. 教学研究. 2024(03): 69-78 .
    5. 蒋平,林雍,刘丹. 党的十八大以来义务教育“双减”政策的演进历程、价值遵循与实践路径. 教育与教学研究. 2024(08): 60-72 .
    6. 朱江华. “双减”政策实施何以超脱“就事论事”思维之迷境:困局与破局. 当代教育科学. 2023(03): 56-65 .
    7. 白颖颖,皮双双,张雪芳. 中小学减负七十载的变迁历程、演进逻辑与未来展望. 现代教育管理. 2023(11): 107-118 .
    8. 牛旭峰,许见华,夏海鹰. “双减”政策的执行困境与治理路径. 教育理论与实践. 2023(31): 24-30 .
    9. 薛晓卓,茹宗志. 信号理论视阈下对“考级”模式的审视与反思. 湖北招生考试. 2023(06): 36-41 .
    10. 王贵霞. 高等职业教育个体职业声望获得的变动研究——基于CFPS 2010—2018数据分析. 职业教育. 2023(33): 37-43 .

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article views (296) PDF downloads (84) Cited by(17)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return