Citation: | LI Meng, YE Lin. Flexible Scale Reconstruction: The Administrative Logic of Urban Innovation Zone Development——An Analysis Based on the Development of National Functional Zone A[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (4): 94-107. |
Urban innovation zones, as hubs for innovation, surpass the traditional production factor-driven development zone model by adopting an innovation-driven approach. These zones are crucial in promoting high-quality urban development, industrial innovation transformation, and government system innovation. The scale reconstruction theory, characterized by its "structure-process" attributes, provides a theoretical perspective on how governments promote urban innovation zone development. Using National Innovation Functional Zone A as a case study, this research tracks governmental operations from its establishment to its elevation to a national functional zone. The findings indicate that Zone A's development is guided by a government rescaling strategy aimed at achieving spatial governance without altering the existing spatial power structure. This approach exhibits the characteristics of flexible scale reconstruction, demonstrating increased flexibility and adaptability. The "flexibility" of scale reconstruction in urban innovation zones is specifically reflected in the adaptable organization of urban spatial hierarchies, power structures, and social networks. The process of scale reconstruction is marked by uncertainty and mobility, allowing significant negotiation and bargaining space for governments at different levels during the negotiation process. Ultimately, the development of urban innovation zones results in a multi-scale governance landscape involving the joint participation of various scales such as "national-regional-local."The findings of this study will help to advance the localized use of scale reconstruction theory.
[1] |
赵峥, 王炳文. 全球创新空间发展: 多尺度探索与中国路径[J]. 中国发展观察, 2019(22): 39-42.
|
[2] |
张京祥, 何鹤鸣. 超越增长: 应对创新型经济的空间规划创新[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(8): 18-25.
|
[3] |
郑震. 空间: 一个社会学的概念[J]. 社会学研究, 2010, 25(5): 167-191.
|
[4] |
王锐. 理解空间政治学: 一个初步的分析框架[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(4): 104-113.
|
[5] |
邹冠男, 邓小月, 张博, 等. 尺度政治视角下的国家级新区尺度跃迁和政策流动——以湖南湘江新区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(2): 103-109.
|
[6] |
陈家祥. 城市新区创新空间规划研究[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2019: 9-15.
|
[7] |
张京祥. 国家—区域治理的尺度重构: 基于"国家战略区域规划"视角的剖析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 45-50.
|
[8] |
程郁, 陈雪. 创新驱动的经济增长——高新区全要素生产率增长的分解[J]. 中国软科学, 2013, 275(11): 26-39.
|
[9] |
房静坤, 曹春. "创新城区"背景下的传统产业园区转型模式探索[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019, 254(S1): 47-56.
|
[10] |
晁恒, 马学广, 李贵才. 尺度重构视角下国家战略区域的空间生产策略——基于国家级新区的探讨[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5): 1-8.
|
[11] |
王兴平, 韩静. 国家级新区内"多区叠合"现象及其效应分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(6): 43-52.
|
[12] |
尼尔·博任纳. 新国家空间: 城市治理与国家形态的尺度重构[M]. 王晓阳, 译. 南京: 江苏凤凰教育出版社, 2020: 107-139.
|
[13] |
于棋. 国家空间的理论演变及国家级新区的建构实践——基于新国家空间理论的思考[D]. 济南: 山东大学硕士学位论文, 2018: 23-28.
|
[14] |
王佃利, 于棋, 王庆歌. 尺度重构视角下国家级新区发展的行政逻辑探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(8): 41-47.
|
[15] |
薄文广, 殷广卫. 国家级新区发展困境分析与可持续发展思考[J]. 南京社会科学, 2017(11): 9-16.
|
[16] |
叶志鹏. 上下互动式扩权: 内生型经济发展中的地方政府行为逻辑——对昆山经济发展的长时段考察[J]. 公共管理学报, 2022, 19(3): 84-95.
|
[17] |
马学广, 李鲁奇. 国外人文地理学尺度政治理论研究进展[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(2): 6-12.
|
[18] |
王丰龙, 刘云刚. 尺度概念的演化与尺度的本质: 基于二次抽象的尺度认识论[J]. 人文地理, 2015, 30(1): 9-15.
|
[19] |
王丰龙, 刘云刚. 尺度政治理论框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1500-1509.
|
[20] |
SMITH N. Uneven development: nature, capital, and the production of space[M]. Georgia: University of Georgia press, 2010: 57-79.
|
[21] |
吴缚龙, 马润潮, 张京祥. 转型与重构: 中国城市发展多维透视[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2007: 22-34.
|
[22] |
COX K R. Spaces of engagement, spaces of dependence and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics[J]. Political geography, 1998, 17(1): 1-23.
|
[23] |
JONES K T. Scale as epistemology[J]. Political geography, 1998, 17(1): 25-28.
|
[24] |
SMITH N. Remaking scale: competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe//ESKELINEN H, SNICKARS F. Competitive European peripheries[M]. Berlin: Springer, 1995: 59-74.
|
[25] |
SHEN J. Scale, state and the city: urban transformation in post-reform China[J]. Habitat international, 2007, 31(3-4): 303-316.
|
[26] |
吴金群, 廖超超, 等. 尺度重组与地域重构: 中国城市行政区划调整40年[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2019: 345-385.
|
[27] |
储程, 李广斌. 尺度重组视角下的城郊型乡村空间重构——以常州市窑港村为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2018(8): 52-58.
|
[28] |
张京祥, 陈浩, 胡嘉佩. 中国城市空间开发中的柔性尺度调整——南京河西新城区的实证研究[J]. 城市规划, 2014, 38(1): 43-49.
|
[29] |
SMITH N. Geography, difference, and the politics of scale[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992: 57-79.
|
[30] |
谢少华. 政策本质初探[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2003(5): 92-97.
|
[31] |
XU J, YEH A. Decoding urban land governance: state reconstruction in contemporary Chinese cities[J]. Urban studies, 2009, 46(3): 559-581.
|
[32] |
周黎安. 行政发包制[J]. 社会, 2014, 34(6): 1-38.
|
[33] |
XU J. Governing city-regions in China: theoretical issues and perspectives for regional strategic planning[J]. Town planning review, 2008, 79(2-3): 157-187.
|
[34] |
张铮, 李政华. "领导小组"机制的发展理路与经验——基于历史制度主义的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019(12): 103-108.
|
[35] |
王贤彬, 聂海峰. 行政区划调整与经济增长[J]. 管理世界, 2010, 199(4): 42-53.
|
[36] |
赵晓冬, 王伟伟, 吕爱国. 国家级经济技术开发区管理体制类型研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013, 342(12): 56-59.
|
[37] |
叶必丰. 论我国的法定机构[J]. 中外法学, 2022, 34(3): 626-642.
|
[38] |
黎少华, 艾永梅. 广东法定机构改革试点调查[J]. 中国经济报告, 2014, 53(3): 28-32.
|
[39] |
朱旭峰, 吴冠生. 中国特色的央地关系: 演变与特点[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(2): 50-57.
|