The Discourse Practice of Smart Cities in China: An Analysis Based on Policy Discourse Network

LI Zhichao; LIU Shaodan

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (4): 45-58.

LI Zhichao, LIU Shaodan. The Discourse Practice of Smart Cities in China: An Analysis Based on Policy Discourse Network[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (4): 45-58.

Citation:

PDF (5674 KB)

The Discourse Practice of Smart Cities in China: An Analysis Based on Policy Discourse Network

LI Zhichao¹,
LIU Shaodan²

More Information

Received Date: May 11, 2022
Available Online: August 09, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The term "smart city", a foreign term in origin, has gradually come to denote an important policy concept and become a practical carrier of urban construction in China. The multiple-actor characteristic and structure of smart city discourse in the different stages of smart city construction in China is described in terms of policy discourse, and the evolution of policy discourse of smart city from an overseas concept to a policy concept and then to policy practice is analyzed. It is found that there have been three stages from the introduction of the concept "smart city" to its nationwide spread: the concept introduction stage, at which the local government and relevant enterprises form a policy discourse coalition and the discourse of the necessity/rationality of smart city construction is initially formed; the exploration and practice stage, at which people come up with different imaginations on how to build a smart city and the discourse begins to diverge; and the comprehensive development stage, at which smart city construction becomes a national strategy and the discourse of different people begins to converge. Attempts are made to provide an analytical perspective from micro-discourse interaction to macro-policy formation and investigate the process of smart city policy discourse from a concept to practice, which is helpful for understanding the policy process and characteristics against the background of central-local relationship in China.
- smart city,
- discourse coalition,
- policy framework,
- exponential random graph model,
- discourse network

FullText(HTML)

References (37)

References

[1]	巫细波, 杨再高. 智慧城市理念与未来城市发展[J]. 城市发展研究, 2010, 17(11): 56-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2010.11.009
[2]	王洪涛, 陈洪侠. 我国智慧城市创新扩散演进机理及启示——基于38个城市的事件史分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(3): 44-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJB201703008.htm
[3]	李智超. 政策试点推广的多重逻辑——基于我国智慧城市试点的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2019, 16(3): 145-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL201903013.htm
[4]	张向阳, 袁泽沛. 广州智慧城市与智慧产业融合发展路径研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(12): 47-50. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2012080632
[5]	刘刚, 张再生, 梁谋. 智慧城市建设面临的问题及其解决途径——以海口市为例[J]. 城市问题, 2013(6): 42-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSWT201306009.htm
[6]	宫攀, 张令新. 国内外智慧城市评价指标体系对比分析及启示[J]. 规划师, 2018, 34(11): 96-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHSI201811016.htm
[7]	崔璐, 杨凯瑞. 智慧城市评价指标体系构建[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(6): 33-38. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJC201806008.htm
[8]	张梓妍, 徐晓林, 明承瀚. 智慧城市建设准备度评估指标体系研究[J]. 电子政务, 2019(2): 82-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZZW201902011.htm
[9]	董宴廷, 王洛忠. 智慧城市建设与城市公共服务水平——基于智慧城市试点的准自然试验[J]. 城市问题, 2021(10): 56-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSWT202110008.htm
[10]	石大千, 丁海, 卫平, 等. 智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(6): 117-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201806009.htm
[11]	武永超. 智慧城市建设能够提升城市韧性吗?——一项准自然实验[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, 82(4): 25-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2021.04.002
[12]	张治栋, 赵必武. 智慧城市建设对城市经济高质量发展的影响——基于双重差分法的实证分析[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(11): 65-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XUXI202111011.htm
[13]	仇保兴. 智慧地推进我国新型城镇化[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2013.05.001
[14]	申悦, 柴彦威, 马修军. 人本导向的智慧社区的概念、模式与架构[J]. 现代城市研究, 2014(10): 13-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2014.10.004
[15]	叶林, 周寒. 超越增长逻辑: 城市治理的多重情境与转向[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(3): 101-112. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/article/id/d0d58736-44e2-4eb6-85fc-7a196ea6457a
[16]	谭羚雁, 娄成武. 保障性住房政策过程的中央与地方政府关系——政策网络理论的分析与应用[J]. 公共管理学报, 2012, 9(1): 52-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6162.2012.01.007
[17]	MARSH D, SMITH M. Understanding policy networks: towards a dialectical approach[J]. Political studies, 2000, 48(1): 4-21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00247
[18]	范世炜. 试析西方政策网络理论的三种研究视角[J]. 政治学研究, 2013(4): 87-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-POLI201304010.htm
[19]	HAY C, RICHARDS D. The tangled webs of Westminster and Whitehall: the discourse, strategy and practice of networking within the British core executive[J]. Public administration, 2000, 78(1): 1-28. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00190
[20]	HENRYA D. Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks[J]. Policy studies journal, 2011, 39(3): 361-383. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x
[21]	HAJER M A, PRESS U. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002: 67-68, 44, 48.
[22]	HAJER M. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995: 155.
[23]	STEPHAN H R. Discourse coalitions and unconventional gas in Scotland: risky 'dash for gas' or vital 'bridge' to a low-carbon future?[EB/OL]. (2015-07-08)[2022-05-10]. https://ipa2015.sciencesconf.org/conference/ipa2015/pages/Hannes_STEPHAN_IPA_Conf_2015_Discourse_coalitions_and_unconventional_gas_in_Scotland.pdf.
[24]	DUYGAN M, ST AU FFACHER M, MEYLAN G. Discourse coalitions in Swiss waste management: gridlock or winds of change?[J]. Waste management, 2018, 72: 25-44.
[25]	张海柱. 环境政策论争的话语分析——以PM2.5争议与环境空气质量标准修订为例[J]. 太平洋学报, 2012, 20(6): 62-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TPYX201206011.htm
[26]	张海柱. 话语联盟、意义竞争与政策制定——以互联网"专车"论争与监管政策为例[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016, 9(5): 3-23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ201605003.htm
[27]	李智超, 谭西涵. 话语联盟、偏好依附与重大政策变迁——基于我国计划生育政策的话语网络分析[J]. 实证社会科学, 2021, 8(1): 92-115.
[28]	朱旭峰, 吴冠生. 中国特色的央地关系: 演变与特点[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 34(2): 50-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSWD201802007.htm
[29]	叶林, 宋星洲, 邓利芳. 从管理到服务: 我国城市治理的转型逻辑及发展趋势[J]. 天津社会科学, 2018(6): 77-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJSK201806012.htm
[30]	GLASER B G, STRAUSS A L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research[J]. Nursing research, 1967, 3(2): 377-380.
[31]	LEIFELD P, HAUNSS S. Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe[J]. European journal of political research, 2011, 51(3): 382-409. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/121163/
[32]	LEIFELD P. Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: a discourse network analysis of German pension politics[J]. Policy studies journal, 2013, 41(1): 169-198. doi: 10.1111/psj.12007
[33]	王晓涛. 缺少顶层设计成智慧城市最大瓶颈[N]. 中国经济导报, 2012-12-11(B03).
[34]	王晓涛. 智慧城市热, 规划比钱更重要[N]. 中国经济导报, 2013-01-22(B05).
[35]	辜胜阻, 杨建武, 刘江日. 当前我国智慧城市建设中的问题与对策[J]. 中国软科学, 2013(1): 6-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRK201301003.htm
[36]	李德仁, 姚远, 邵振峰. 智慧城市中的大数据[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(6): 631-640.
[37]	王广斌, 张雷, 刘洪磊. 国内外智慧城市理论研究与实践思考[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(19): 153-160. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJB201319031.htm

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	王德正. 智慧城市非智慧困境中公民隐私权保护问题研究. 法制与经济. 2024(02): 70-83 .
2.	王锐，王婷. 基于BP神经网络的智慧城市发展水平评价研究. 内蒙古科技与经济. 2023(14): 32-36 .
3.	李德智，李蓓，黄冠英，于路港. 典型发达国家智慧城市的建设经验及启示：“理念—机制—方法”范式. 现代城市研究. 2023(12): 40-44+51 .

Other cited types(7)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (390) PDF downloads (105) Cited by(10)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Discourse Practice of Smart Cities in China: An Analysis Based on Policy Discourse Network

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(7)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content