• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
NI Xing, MA zhenmiao. The Determinants of Regional Tolerance of Corruption and Their Effective Governance: An Empirical Study of 314 Prefecture-level Administrative Regions[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (1): 100-116.
Citation: NI Xing, MA zhenmiao. The Determinants of Regional Tolerance of Corruption and Their Effective Governance: An Empirical Study of 314 Prefecture-level Administrative Regions[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (1): 100-116.

The Determinants of Regional Tolerance of Corruption and Their Effective Governance: An Empirical Study of 314 Prefecture-level Administrative Regions

More Information
  • Received Date: August 07, 2020
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • Eliminating corruption requires not only the reinforcement of disciplinary bodies for supervising government and public officials but also the encouragement of civic participation in fighting corruption. Reducing the corruption tolerance level is crucial for improving the public's willingness to combat corruption. Based on data from 314 prefectural areas across the country, it is found that public governance, economic development and societal culture have significant impact on the respondents' tolerance of corruption. The respondents exhibit a lower tolerance of corruption in those areas with more expenditure invested in the domains of science and education, a larger income gap between urban and rural areas, a greater distance from Beijing, a higher level of social trust and public trust in central government, and a higher score on the index of bribe solicitation. There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between economic development and public tolerance of corruption. Therefore, it is important to promote sustainable economic growth, reduce income gap between urban and rural areas, improve political and social trust, and eliminate corruption that directly affects the people. These efforts would reduce public tolerance of corruption, contribute to the collaboration between different actors in fighting corruption and solidify the overwhelming victory of the anti-corruption campaign.
  • [1]
    GONG T, WANG S, REN J M. Corruption in the eye of the beholder: survey evidence from mainland China and Hong Kong[J]. International public management journal, 2015(3): 458-482.
    [2]
    GONG T, XIAO H. Socially embedded anti-corruption governance: evidence from Hong Kong [J]. Public administration & development, 2017, 37(3): 176-190.
    [3]
    张远煌, 彭德才. 民众的腐败容忍度: 实证研究及启示——基于世界价值观调查数据的分析[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(1): 131-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XMDS201701014.htm
    [4]
    ROSE-ACKERMAN S. The economics of corruption[J]. Journal of public economics, 1975, 4(2): 187-203. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(75)90017-1
    [5]
    SHLEIFE A, VISHNY R W. Corruption[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 1993(108): 599-618.
    [6]
    HEIDENHEIMER A J, MICHAEL J, VICTOR T L, eds. Political corruption: a handbook[M]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1970: 953-961.
    [7]
    公婷, 王世茹. 腐败"零容忍"的政治文化——以香港为例[J]. 复旦公共行政评论, 2012(2): 169-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FDGG201202013.htm
    [8]
    倪星. 利益关联、行动选择与公众的腐败容忍度——基于G省的实证分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 70(4): 118-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSLD201704013.htm
    [9]
    GONG T, WANG S. Indicators and implications of zero tolerance of corruption: the case of Hong Kong[J]. Social indicators research, 2013, 112(3): 569-586. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0071-3
    [10]
    CECILIA LAVENA. What determines permissiveness toward corruption? A study of attitudes in Latin America[J]. Public integrity, 2013, 15(15): 345-365. doi: 10.2753/PIN1099-9922150402?src=recsys
    [11]
    IOANA POP. Acceptance of corrupt acts: a comparative study of values regarding corruption in Europe[J]. Journal of social research & policy, 2012, 3(1): 27-42. http://www.oalib.com/paper/2887196
    [12]
    TRUEX R. Corruption, attitudes, and education: survey evidence from Nepal[J]. World development, 2011, 39(7): 1133-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.003
    [13]
    ANAND V, ASHFORTH B E, JOSHI M. Business as usual: the acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations[J]. Academy of management executive, 2004, 18(2): 39-53.
    [14]
    AIDT T, DUTTA J, SENA V. Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence[J]. Journal of comparative economics, 2008, 36(2): 195-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2007.11.004
    [15]
    TETIANA STEPURKO, MILENA PAVLOVA, IRENA GRYGA, et al. Informal payments for health care services: corruption or gratitude?A study on public attitudes, perceptions and opinions in six central and Eastern European countries[J]. Communist and post-communist studies, 2013, 46(4): 419-431. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.08.004
    [16]
    EUNJUNG CHOI, JONGSEOK WOO. Political corruption, economy, and citizens' evaluation of democracy in South Korea[J]. Contemporary politics, 2012, 18(4): 451-466. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2012.702977
    [17]
    LUO Y. An organizational perspective of corruption[J]. Management & organization review, 2010, 1(1): 119-154. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2007-07430-004
    [18]
    PILLAY S, KLUVERS R. An institutional theory perspective on corruption: the case of a developing democracy[J]. Financial accountability & management, 2014, 30(1): 95-119. doi: 10.1111/faam.12029
    [19]
    VILMOS F M, GARY R W, HEATHER E. Ending corruption: the interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs[J]. The academy of management review, 2008(3): 750-770. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=32465769&site=ehost-live
    [20]
    世界银行. 增长的质量[M]. 北京: 中国财经出版社, 2001: 127-154.
    [21]
    MARK SCHACTER. Combating corruption: look before you leap[J]. Finance & development, 2004, 41(4): 40-43. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=trueu0026db=buhu0026AN=15512383u0026site=ehost-live
    [22]
    胡正昌. 公共治理理论及其政府治理模式的转变[J]. 前沿, 2008 (5): 90-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QAYA200805027.htm
    [23]
    俞可平. 推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化[J]. 前线, 2014(1): 5-8. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QXZZ201401002.htm
    [24]
    FRIEDLAND R, ALFORD R R. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991: 180-203.
    [25]
    周黎安, 陶婧. 政府规模、市场化与地区腐败问题研究[J]. 经济研究, 2009(1): 57-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ200901004.htm
    [26]
    BARR A, SERRA D. Corruption and culture: an experimental analysis[J]. Journal of public economics, 2010, 94(11/12): 862-869. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272710000927
    [27]
    BJØRNSKOV C, DREHER A, FISCHER A V J. The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world[J]. Public choice, 2007(130): 267-292. http://cjres.oxfordjournals.org/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11127-006-9081-5&link_type=DOI
    [28]
    WILLIAM M W. Neutralization as a hardening process: considerations in the modeling of change [J]. Social forces, 1984(4): 995-1019. http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/62/4/995.short
    [29]
    DIMAGGIO P J. Interest and agency in institutional theory [M]// ZUCKER L G. Institutional patterns and organizations: culture and environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988: 3-21.
    [30]
    KONSTANTINIDIS I, XEZONAKIS G. Sources of tolerance towards corrupted politicians in Greece: the role of trade offs and individual benefits[J]. Crime law & social change, 2013, 60(5): 549-563. doi: 10.1007/s10611-013-9478-2
    [31]
    李文. 诱发腐败的相对剥夺心理: 分析与比较[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2010(5): 37-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XZXY201005010.htm
    [32]
    魏德安. 双重悖论——腐败如何影响中国的经济增长[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2014: 10-19.
    [33]
    王哲, 孟天广, 顾昕. 经济不平等与民众的腐败容忍度: 基于多层次模型的跨国分析[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2016(2): 89-103. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSH201602008.htm
    [34]
    ROTHSTEIN B, EEK D. Political corruption and social trust: an experimental approach[J]. Rationality and society, 2009, 21(1): 81-112. doi: 10.1177/1043463108099349
    [35]
    PUTNAM R D. The prosperous community: social capital and public life[J]. The American prospect, 1993(13): 35-42. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10012917999
    [36]
    MORRIS S D, KLESNER J L. Corruption and trust: theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico[J]. Comparative political studies, 2010(10): 1258-1285. doi: 10.1177/0010414010369072
    [37]
    PHARR S J, PUTNAM R D. Disaffected democracies: what's troubling the trilateral countries? [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000: 173-201.
    [38]
    肖汉宇, 公婷. 腐败容忍度与"社会反腐": 基于香港的实证分析[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016(3): 42-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ201603006.htm
    [39]
    宋小宁, 陈斌, 梁若冰. 一般性转移支付: 能否促进基本公共服务供给?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(7): 33-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SLJY201207002.htm
    [40]
    范子英, 彭飞, 刘冲. 政治关联与经济增长——基于卫星灯光数据的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2016(1): 114-126. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201601010.htm
    [41]
    陆铭, 陈钊. 城市化、城市倾向的经济政策与城乡收入差距[J]. 经济研究, 2004(6): 50-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ200406005.htm
    [42]
    GLAESER E L, SAKS R E. Corruption in America[J]. Journal of public economics, 2006(90): 1053- 1072.
    [43]
    SNG T H. Size and dynastic decline: the principal-agent problem in late imperial China, 1700-1850[J]. Explorations in economic history, 2014(54): 107-127. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498314000205
    [44]
    PAPAIOANNOU E. National institutions and subnational development in Africa[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 2013(1): 151-213. http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25802926
    [45]
    秦蒙, 刘修岩, 李松林. 城市蔓延如何影响地区经济增长?——基于夜间灯光数据的研究[J]. 经济学季刊, 2019, 18(2): 118-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU201902006.htm
    [46]
    贺炎林, 张瀛文, 莫建明. 不同区域治理环境下股权集中度对公司业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2014(12): 148-163. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRYJ201412010.htm
    [47]
    应星. 大河移民上访的故事: 从"讨个说法"到"摆平理顺"[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 2001: 105-106.
    [48]
    季程远, 孟天广. 反腐败与政治信任: 结构偏好与规模偏好的影响差异[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 28(2): 99-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJX202002014.htm

Catalog

    Article views (910) PDF downloads (95) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return