• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
KONG Fanqin, DENG Tao, YANG Daqing, WAN Man. Study on the Working Hours of Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Its Influence on Perceived Workload[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (6): 95-106.
Citation: KONG Fanqin, DENG Tao, YANG Daqing, WAN Man. Study on the Working Hours of Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Its Influence on Perceived Workload[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (6): 95-106.

Study on the Working Hours of Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Its Influence on Perceived Workload

More Information
  • Received Date: August 12, 2023
  • Available Online: January 15, 2024
  • In recent years, how to effectively reduce the burden of primary and secondary school teachers has been a hot topic concerned by all sides of society. Therefore, it is urgent to investigate the current situation of working hours of primary and secondary school teachers and its impact on their work load perception through a nationwide large-scale sample survey.Through a questionnaire survey of 48, 874 primary and secondary school teachers in China, on their working hours and the impact on their sense of work load, the following findings are found: First, the overall working hours of primary and secondary school teachers are long, and the time allocation structure is unreasonable. Second, there are significant differences in the working hours of teachers in different types of primary and secondary schools. Third, working hours, time spent on dispute handling and coordination, and subjective perception of working hours can significantly affect teachers' sense of work load. In order to further implement the work of reducing the burden of primary and secondary school teachers, it is suggested to clarify the work boundary and respect the professional autonomy of teachers; considering the differences of teacher groups, we should focus on special groups such as young female teachers and class teachers because of the "group" policy; we should also focus on managing workloads generated by non-instructional work.

  • [1]
    柳海民, 邹红军. 新时代教师研究热点: "德""誉"相济, "酬""劳"并重[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(6): 69-82. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/cn/article/id/db1a53a7-55f5-47af-b94b-6332869eca5f
    [2]
    丁道勇. 论教育改革中的教师时间[J]. 教师教育研究, 2009, 21(1): 11-15.
    [3]
    李新翠. 中小学教师工作量的超负荷与有效调适[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2016(2): 56-60.
    [4]
    童星. 初中教师工作时间及其影响因素研究——基于中国教育追踪调查(CEPS)数据的分析[J]. 教师教育研究, 2017(2): 107-112.
    [5]
    王建军, 陈寅, 吴海燕. 我国普通高中教师专业生活状态调查[J]. 基础教育, 2010(8): 3-14.
    [6]
    白冰. 中学教师工作时间、抑郁与主观幸福感的关系[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2013: 21.
    [7]
    翟晓雪. 教学工作时间对农村教师工作积极性的影响研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2017: 37.
    [8]
    孙孔懿. 教育时间学[M]. 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 1993: 159.
    [9]
    王富伟, 胡媛媛, 赵树贤. 小学教师典型一天的制度分析[J]. 全球教育展望, 2018(9): 117-128.
    [10]
    刘乔卉, 裴淼. 中小学教师的时间困境——基于T市中学教师的混合研究[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2021(6): 76-82.
    [11]
    张小菊, 管明悦. 如何实现小学教师工作量的减负增效——基于某小学教师40天工作时间的实地调查[J]. 全球教育展望, 2019(6): 97-109.
    [12]
    OECD. Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators[M]. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018: 386.
    [13]
    HWA S J, HYUNG-SHINK J. Establishment of overall workload assessment technique for various tasks and workplaces[J]. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 2001, 28(6): 341-351. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00040-3
    [14]
    VELTMAN J A, GAILLARD A W K. Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task [J]. Biological psychology, 1996, 42(3): 323-342. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05165-1
    [15]
    李新翠. 中小学教师工作负荷研究[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2020: 1.
    [16]
    周海明, 陆欣欣, 时勘, 等. 青年教师工作负荷对心理疏离的影响机制——有调节的中介效应[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2017(3): 78-83.
    [17]
    肖林生. 独立学院教师工作负荷与离职倾向: 工作满意度的中介效应[J]. 高教探索, 2017(7): 80-89.
    [18]
    SPECTOR P E, JEX S M. Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory [J]. Journal of occupational health psychology, 1998, 3(4): 356-367. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
    [19]
    李新翠. 中小学教师工作负荷: 结构、水平与类型[J]. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2021, 20(2): 82-89.
    [20]
    李军, 曹莹雯. 上海市初中班主任工作负荷状况的调查研究[J]. 上海教育科研, 2006(9): 44-46.
    [21]
    杜屏, 刘斌. 乡村教师多劳多得吗?——乡村教师的工作时间与工资的关系探究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020, 32(3): 98-106.
    [22]
    盖阔, 李广. 中小学教师队伍发展: 成就、问题与策略——基于全国8个省份中小学教师工作、生活样态调查[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(6): 107-116. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/cn/article/id/aad39f75-32be-4cfd-9ed0-147d40eb1818
    [23]
    OECD. TALIS 2018 Data [EB/OL]. (2019-06-19) [2023-01-30]. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/.
    [24]
    柳海民, 杨宇轩. 教师工作强度: 认识进阶与学术视野[J]. 现代教育管理, 2022(10): 1-11.
    [25]
    王三银, 刘洪, 林彦梅. 工作边界强度对员工组织认同的影响研究——工作边界弹性能力和组织自尊的作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(5): 119-128.
    [26]
    苏启敏. 为责任而教: 教师专业责任的概念澄清与边界划定[J]. 教师教育研究, 2017, 29(4): 13-19.
    [27]
    吴小贻. 教师专业自主权的解读及实现[J]. 教育研究, 2006(7): 52-55.
    [28]
    席梅红. 关于中小学教师工作负荷的实证调查研究[J]. 现代教育论丛, 2017(2): 46-51.
    [29]
    Department for Education. Workload challenge: analysis of responses[EB/OL]. (2015-02-01) [2023-02-20]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f0c7ded915d74e6228124/Government_Response_to_the_Workload_Challenge.pdf.
    [30]
    By JTU Institute for Education and Culture. An international comparative study on the working conditions of school personnel[EB /OL]. (2008-11-01)[2022-10-23]. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/1909/jas01.pdf.

Catalog

    Article views (127) PDF downloads (107) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return