Discussing and Reconstructing the Definition of the Legal Person of Inclusive Private Kindergartens

PENG Qian; GUO Kai

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2021 > (4): 69-77.

PENG Qian, GUO Kai. Discussing and Reconstructing the Definition of the Legal Person of Inclusive Private Kindergartens[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (4): 69-77.

Citation:

PDF (1820 KB)

Discussing and Reconstructing the Definition of the Legal Person of Inclusive Private Kindergartens

PENG Qian¹,
GUO Kai^2, ,

More Information

Received Date: January 12, 2021
Available Online: September 02, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

According to the Civil Code, inclusive private kindergartens are defined as non-profit legal persons and donation legal persons. It is legitimate to define inclusive private kindergartens as non-profit legal persons. However, it is debatable to define all inclusive private kindergartens as donor legal persons. The definition of inclusive private kindergartens as donation legal persons does not conform to the fact that most inclusive private kindergartens are not organized with donation and the basic characteristics of the donation legal person, and it also violates the theoretical basis of the financial legal person. Drawing on the international experience and the theory of consortium and following the tradition of public law regulation of non-profit legal persons in China, we can specifically define inclusive private kindergartens as non-profit legal persons as donor legal persons and social service organization legal persons. In addition, the corresponding administrative regulations should be revised and improved to determine their respective behavior boundaries, provide corresponding legal basis for the supervision of the competent departments, and protect the enthusiasm of "non-donor" social forces to participate in the organization of preschool education.

FullText(HTML)

References (13)

References

[1]	王利明. 《民法典》的本土性与时代性[J]. 交大法学, 2017(3): 87-94.
[2]	张保红. 《民法典》法人资格取得制度释评[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2018(7): 67-76.
[3]	宋亚辉. 营利概念与中国法人法的体系效应[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020(6): 120-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK202006006.htm
[4]	税兵. 非营利法人解释[J]. 法学研究, 2007(5): 66-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LAWS200705007.htm
[5]	金锦萍. 论基本公共服务提供的组织形式选择——兼论营利法人与非营利法人分类的规范意义[J]. 当代法学, 2018(4): 13-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4781.2018.04.002
[6]	张新宝. 从《民法通则》到《民法典》: 基于功能主义的法人分类[J]. 比较法研究, 2017(4): 16-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJFY201704002.htm
[7]	张新宝, 汪榆淼. 论"为其他非营利目的"成立的法人[J]. 法学评论, 2018(4): 1-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXPL201804001.htm
[8]	魏聪, 王海英, 胡晨曦, 等. 促进普惠性民办幼儿园的非营利转向更适合中国国情[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2018(7): 12-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYX201807005.htm
[9]	罗昆. 捐助法人组织架构的制度缺陷及完善进路[J]. 法学, 2017(10): 51-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXZZ201710005.htm
[10]	张力. 财团、社团抑或其他——我国非营利性法人主体构造模式的选择[J]. 学术探索, 2008(6): 55-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXST200806014.htm
[11]	张力. 民法典中法人分类的逻辑性: 功用、局限及其克服[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2): 93-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ADZS201902011.htm
[12]	张国平. 论我国公益组织与财团法人制度的契合[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2012(1): 91-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHKX201201014.htm
[13]	张力. 法人功能性分类与结构性分类的兼容解释[J]. 中国法学, 2019(2): 148-166. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGFX201902009.htm

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	于浩. 以形驭实：公共服务社会化供给结构的优化路径. 邢台学院学报. 2025(01): 29-43 .
2.	于浩. 新型城镇化区域学前教育办园模式的选择——以中德天津大邱庄生态城为例. 吕梁教育学院学报. 2023(04): 66-71 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (690) PDF downloads (83) Cited by(2)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Discussing and Reconstructing the Definition of the Legal Person of Inclusive Private Kindergartens

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content