Employers' Preference and Employees' Welfare Accessibility: Based on a Survey Data of Migrant Population in 2020

WU Xiaofang

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (6): 114-126.

WU Xiaofang. Employers' Preference and Employees' Welfare Accessibility: Based on a Survey Data of Migrant Population in 2020[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (6): 114-126.

Citation:

PDF (1963 KB)

Employers' Preference and Employees' Welfare Accessibility: Based on a Survey Data of Migrant Population in 2020

WU Xiaofang

More Information

Received Date: October 20, 2021
Available Online: January 05, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In the existing literature of workers' welfare accessibility, Employers are usually portrayed as "fee evaders" who avoid financial responsibilities to decrease labor cost. However, from employers-centered perspective, enterprises could be supporters of workers' welfare programs. Taking the housing provident fund system as an example, this paper finds, based on an analysis of data from a 2020 mobility survey, that whether workers participate in housing provident funds is significantly influenced by the size, nature of ownership, and skill system of the enterprise. Enterprises contribute to provident funds for mobile workers not only for compliance needs, but also to lock in core employees and skilled professionals. The final conclusion challenges the traditional government-centered perspective and hypothesis of enterprise evaders, and further provides policy implication in improving workers' welfare accessibility. Workers' welfare provision should stress the combination of enterprise responsibility and governmental accountability, that the government should establish appropriate tax and regulatory frameworks to guide the enterprise to fulfill employers' responsibility, advocate po-licy innovation, as well as support enterprises to establish employees' welfare programs to match its skill and business status.
- employees' welfare access,
- migrant population,
- employer preference,
- incentive structural difference

FullText(HTML)

References (28)

References

[1]	许红梅, 李春涛. 劳动保护、社保压力与企业违约风险——基于《社会保险法》实施的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(3): 115-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRYJ202003007.htm
[2]	封进. 中国城镇职工社会保险制度的参与激励[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(7): 104-117. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201307009.htm
[3]	刘子兰, 刘辉, 杨汝岱. 最低工资制度对企业社会保险参保积极性的影响——基于中国工业企业数据库的分析[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4): 1267-1290. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU202004007.htm
[4]	杜鹏程, 徐舒, 吴明琴. 劳动保护与农民工福利改善——基于新《劳动合同法》的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(3): 64-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201803006.htm
[5]	董芳, 周江涛. 《社会保险法》实施对外出农民工社会保险参保率的影响研究[J]. 社会保障研究, 2020(2): 76-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHBY202002009.htm
[6]	郭秀云. 城镇职工基本养老保险降费空间的地区差异研究——基于参数匹配模型的比较静态分析[J]. 保险研究, 2020(5): 94-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYJ202005007.htm
[7]	唐珏, 封进. 社会保险缴费对企业资本劳动比的影响——以21世纪初省级养老保险征收机构变更为例[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(11): 87-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201911007.htm
[8]	蒙克. 资本主义多样性与公共政策研究[J]. 公共管理评论, 2017(2): 3-15.
[9]	EBBINGHAUS B, MANOW P. Introduction: studying varieties of welfare capitalism//EBBINGHAUS B, MANOW P. Comparing welfare capitalism: social policy and political economy in Europe, Japan and the USA[C]. London: Routledge, 2001: 1-24.
[10]	HALL P A, SOSKICE D W. An introduction to varieties of capitalism//HALL P A, SOSKICE D W. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001: 1-68.
[11]	田北海, 雷华. 人力资本、权利意识、维权行动与福利获得——农民工社会保险待遇的雇主供给机制研究[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2011, 31(6): 78-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNZX201106017.htm
[12]	梁土坤. 个体差异、企业特征、制度保护与流动人口社会保险可及性——基于"福利三角"理论模型的实证研究[J]. 社会保障研究, 2017(1): 73-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHBY201701009.htm
[13]	GAO Q, RICKNE J. Inequality in social insurance participation and generosity: do firm characteristics matter? [J]. Social policy & administration, 2017, 51(5): 755-775.
[14]	国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 第七次全国人口普查公报-城乡人口和流动人口情况[EB/OL]. (2021-05-11)[2021-06-04]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/sjfb/zxfb2020/202105/t20210511_1817202.html.
[15]	殷俊, 彭聪. 住房公积金制度参缴影响因素分析及改革路径选择[J]. 社会保障研究, 2016(6): 40-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHBY201606006.htm
[16]	蒙克. 从福利国家到福利体系: 对中国社会政策创新的启示[J]. 广东社会科学, 2018(4): 205-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDSK201804025.htm
[17]	MARES I. Firms and the welfare state: when, why, and how does social policy matter to employers? //HALL P A, SOSKICE D. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 184-212.
[18]	MARES I. The sources of business interest in social insurance: sectoral versus national differences[J]. World politics, 2003, 55(2): 229-258.
[19]	MARTIN C, THELEN K. The state and coordinated capitalism: contributions of the public sector to social solidarity in postindustrial societies[J]. World politics, 2007, 60(1): 1-36.
[20]	MANOW P. Welfare state building and coordinated capitalism in Japan and Germany//STREECK W, YAMAMURA K. The origins of non-liberal capitalism: Germany and Japan in comparison[C]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001: 94-120.
[21]	岳经纶, 方珂. 从"社会身份本位"到"人类需要本位": 中国社会政策的范式演进[J]. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(2): 68-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSYK201902007.htm
[22]	BUSEMEYER M. Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies[J]. Social-economic review, 2009, 7(3): 375-406.
[23]	ESTÉEZ-ABE M, IVERSEN T, SOSKICE D. Social protection and the formation of skills: a reinterpretation of the Welfare State//HALL P A, SOSKICE D. Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 145-183.
[24]	赵绍阳, 杨豪. 我国企业社会保险逃费现象的实证检验[J]. 统计研究, 2016, 33(1): 78-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYJ201601011.htm
[25]	郑秉文. 社会保险缴费与竞争中性偏离——对征收体制改革过渡期政策的思考[J]. 中国人口科学, 2019(4): 2-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKRK201904002.htm
[26]	阳义南. 发展多层次多支柱养老保险体系[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2021-06-16.
[27]	FLECKENSTEIN T, SAUNDERS A M, SEELEIB-KAISER M. The dual transformation of social protection and human capital: comparing Britain and Germany[J]. Comparative political studies, 2011, 44(12): 1622-1650.
[28]	ESTÉVEZ-ABE M. Gender bias in skills and social policies: the varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation[J]. Social politics: international studies in gender, state, and society, 2005, 12(2): 180-215.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(0)

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (297) PDF downloads (154) Cited by(1)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Employers' Preference and Employees' Welfare Accessibility: Based on a Survey Data of Migrant Population in 2020

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(0)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content