How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service

WU Yue

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (5): 31-42.

WU Yue. How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (5): 31-42.

Citation:

WU Yue. How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (5): 31-42.

Citation:

WU Yue. How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (5): 31-42.

PDF (1022 KB)

How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service

WU Yue

More Information

Received Date: May 04, 2022
Available Online: November 14, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Co-production is of great significance in the supply of public services in urban communities. In addition to stimulating public community participation, it also helps to improve the quality of community public services. X District of City C is taken as a typical case to explore the formation mechanism and promotion way of the public service co-production practice in urban community. It is found that under the driving force of national creation and self-drive, the practice of co-production ensures the common presence of conventional producers, consumer producers, the state and society and forms the joint force of all subjects, which enhances the durability and benefit of citizen participation. Although the practice of co-production cannot solve all the problems in the field of community public service supply, refining the action logic of co-production undoubtedly provides a useful idea for building a community governance pattern of co-construction, co-governance and sharing.
- urban community,
- public services,
- co-production,
- community governance,
- co-construction, co-governance and sharing

FullText(HTML)

References (43)

References

[1]	刘安. 市民社会? 法团主义?——海外中国学关于改革后中国国家与社会关系研究述评[J]. 文史哲, 2009(5): 162-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0511-4721.2009.05.018
[2]	肖林. 迈向"社区公共财政"?——城市社区服务专项资金政策分析[J]. 社会发展研究, 2020(4): 81-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HFYJ202004007.htm
[3]	MIGDAL J S. Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World [M]. Princeton: Princeton University, 1988: 4.
[4]	吴月. 代理人再生产: 基层社会治理的新实践及其逻辑[J]. 社会主义研究, 2018(5): 105-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZY201805014.htm
[5]	史云桐. "政府造社会": 社区公共服务领域的"社会生产"实践[J]. 社会发展研究, 2016(4): 47-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HFYJ201604003.htm
[6]	OSBORNE S P, RADNOR Z, STROKOSCH K. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment?[J]. Public management review, 2016, 18(5-6): 639-653.
[7]	容志, 张云翔. 社区微更新中政社共同生产的类型与生成逻辑——基于上海市Y社区的实践案例分析[J]. 探索, 2020(3): 127-141. doi: 10.16501/j.cnki.50-1019/d.2020.03.012
[8]	徐宇珊. 服务型治理: 社区服务中心参与社区治理的角色与路径[J]. 社会科学, 2016(10): 99-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHKX201610009.htm
[9]	张云翔. 基层党组织如何助推社区共同生产?——基于S市L社区蔷薇项目的案例研究[J]. 行政论坛, 2022, 29(4): 115-123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2022.04.015
[10]	VAN EIJK C, STEEN T. Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence[J]. International review of administrative sciences, 2015, 82(1): 28-46.
[11]	OSTROM E. Crossing the Great Divide: coproduction, synergy, and development[J]. World development, 1996, 24(6): 1073-1087. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
[12]	ALFORD J. Defining the client in the public sector: a social-exchange perspective[J]. Public administration review, 2002, 62(3): 337-346. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00183
[13]	LOEFFLER E, BOVAIRD T. User and community co-production of public services: what does the evidence tell Us?[J]. International journal of public administration, 2016, 39(13): 1006-1019.
[14]	ALFORD J. Why do public sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory[J]. Administration & society, 2016, 34(1): 32-56.
[15]	田毅鹏, 王丽丽. 单位的"隐形在场"与基层社会治理——以"后单位社会"为背景[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2017(2): 87-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SPEC201702014.htm
[16]	张云翔, 容志. 我国社区服务共同生产的形成机制研究——以上海市R社区微更新为例[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2021(3): 93-100. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXY202103008.htm
[17]	陈天祥, 郑佳斯, 贾晶晶. 形塑社会: 改革开放以来国家与社会关系的变迁逻辑——基于广东经验的考察[J]. 学术研究, 2017(9): 68-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XSYJ201709010.htm
[18]	张云翔. 公共服务的共同生产: 文献综述及其启示[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2018(5): 31-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSXX201805004.htm
[19]	黄晓春. 从"家门口"服务改革看社区治理创新[J]. 社会治理, 2020(4): 36-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLSH202004010.htm
[20]	蒋经法, 罗青林. 社区财政制度的重构: 背景、原则与设想[J]. 当代财经, 2012(8): 24-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDCJ201208005.htm
[21]	王杰秀, 黄晓春. 多重转型交汇中的社区社会组织[J]. 社会政策研究, 2021(3): 89-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZYA202103009.htm
[22]	李友梅, 肖瑛, 黄晓春. 当代中国社会建设的公共性困境及其超越[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(4): 125-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK201204007.htm
[23]	杨贵华. 转换居民的社区参与方式, 提升居民的自组织参与能力——城市社区自组织能力建设路径研究[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版), 2009(1): 127-133. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FDDX200901014.htm
[24]	傅道忠. 财政决策的民生导向探讨[J]. 当代财经, 2009(3): 31-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDCJ200903006.htm
[25]	魏娜, 陈俊杰, 王焕. 共同生产视域下的社会治理共同体建构——以A市X区社会治安共同生产为例[J]. 教学与研究, 2021(11): 43-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JWDP202111006.htm
[26]	赵孟营. 城市社区治理现代化: 关系论的视角[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2017(2): 80-86. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SPEC201702013.htm
[27]	吴晓林, 谢伊云. 国家主导下的社会创制: 城市基层治理转型的"凭借机制"——以成都市武侯区社区治理改革为例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(5): 91-98. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXGL202005017.htm
[28]	熊易寒. 国家助推与社会成长: 现代熟人社区建构的案例研究[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(5): 99-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXGL202005019.htm
[29]	桂勇, 黄荣贵. 城市社区: 共同体还是"互不相关的邻里"[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2006(6): 36-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZSD200606006.htm
[30]	新华社. 坚持系统建设整体建设奋力开创城市基层党建引领基层治理新局面[EB/OL]. [2021-06-17]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/mrdx/2021-06/18/c_1310015133.htm.
[31]	何增科, 托马斯·海贝勒, 根特·舒伯特. 城乡公民参与和政治合法性[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2007: 148.
[32]	米歇尔·克罗齐耶, 埃哈尔·费埃德伯格. 行动者与系统——集体行动的政治学[M]. 张月, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2007: 313-314.
[33]	徐选国, 吴佳峻, 杨威威. 有组织的合作行动何以可能?——上海梅村党建激活社区治理实践的案例研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021(1): 23-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ202101003.htm
[34]	肖林. 协商致"公"——基层协商民主与公共性的重建[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2017(4): 104-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSXZ201704014.htm
[35]	习近平. 在庆祝全国人民代表大会成立六十周年大会上的讲话[J]. 中国人大, 2019(19): 16-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRE201919005.htm
[36]	王浦劬, 汤彬. 基层党组织治理权威塑造机制研究——基于T市B区社区党组织治理经验的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020(6): 106-119. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ202006010.htm
[37]	肖林. 迈向"社区公共财政"?——城市社区服务专项资金政策分析[J]. 社会发展研究, 2020(4): 81-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HFYJ202004007.htm
[38]	方勇. 柔性控制: 政府主导型社区基金会的项目制运行逻辑[J]. 社会主义研究, 2018(2): 98-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZY201802012.htm
[39]	EVANS P. State-society synergy: government and social capital in development[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997: 3.
[40]	翟学伟. 中国人行动的逻辑[M]. 上海: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 2017: 41.
[41]	王印红, 李莉. 女性何以增进社区治理效能?——基于Q市三个社区的案例研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021(6): 66-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ202106005.htm
[42]	史云桐. 城市社区公共财政政策何以执行[J]. 社会主义研究, 2020(6): 143-150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHZY202006019.htm
[43]	曹海军, 鲍操. 社区治理共同体建设——新时代社区治理制度化的理论逻辑与实现路径[J]. 理论探讨, 2020(1): 12-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLTT202001003.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (576) PDF downloads (183)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

How to Achieve "Co-production": An Empirical Study Based on Urban Community Public Service

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content