Spatial Production and Mechanism of Cross-Regional Collaborative Innovation in State-Level New Area——A Case Study Based on the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration

SUO Liming; FU Xueqin

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2025 > (1): 20-34.

SUO Liming, FU Xueqin. Spatial Production and Mechanism of Cross-Regional Collaborative Innovation in State-Level New Area——A Case Study Based on the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2025, (1): 20-34.

Citation:

PDF (6332 KB)

Spatial Production and Mechanism of Cross-Regional Collaborative Innovation in State-Level New Area——A Case Study Based on the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration

More Information

Received Date: July 26, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

State-level new areas are new regional organizations and comprehensive functional platforms built on the city-region scale. State-level new areas cooperation has become a new model for achieving cross-regional collaborative innovation and development. The article takes spatial production as a key perspective to understand cross-regional collaborative innovation cooperation in state-level new areas, based on the study of typical cases of collaborative innovation cooperation in Chongqing Liangjiang state-level new area and Sichuan Tianfu state-level new area, the findings show that collaborative innovation cooperation in state-level new areas is rooted in the political, economic, institutional and social environment of the region, and is inseparable from the integration function of spatial production factors such as power, capital, policy, and social network, and has gone through three spatial integration stages: weak connection, intermediary connection, and strong connection. Among them, power reconstruction is the core driving force of spatial production, capital de-regionalization is the forerunner of spatial production, policy boundary weakening is an important institutional foundation for spatial production, and collaborative networks play an important connecting role.

FullText(HTML)

References (44)

References

[1]	彭建, 魏海, 李贵才, 等. 基于城市群的国家级新区区位选择[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(1): 3-14.
[2]	曹清峰. 国家级新区对区域经济增长的带动效应——基于70大中城市的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(7): 43-60.
[3]	锁利铭. 跨界治理的驱动机制、应用情景及策略分析[J]. 国家治理, 2023(12): 60-65.
[4]	锁利铭, 李雪. 从"单一边界"到"多重边界"的区域公共事务治理——基于对长三角大气污染防治合作的观察[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(2): 92-100.
[5]	SUO L, LI X, CAO S. How governance boundaries affect regional collaboration on atmospheric governance——evidence from china's Yangtze River Delta[J]. Review of policy research, 2023, 40(4): 509-533. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12541
[6]	TRIPPL M. Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: key factors and challenges[J]. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2010, 101(2): 150-160. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
[7]	LUNDQUIST K, TRIPPL M. Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: a conceptual analysis[J]. Regional studies, 2013, 47(3): 450-460. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.560933
[8]	JAUHIAINEN J S. Baltic sea region innovation systems: challenges and opportunities[J]. Baltic sea region policy briefing, 2014, 2(1): 63-73.
[9]	MAKKONEN T, ROHDE S. Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications[J]. European planning studies, 2016, 24(9): 1623-1642. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626
[10]	VAN DEN BROEK J, BENNEWORTH P, RUTTEN R. Institutionalization of cross-border regional innovation systems: the role of university institutional entrepreneurs[J]. Regional studies, regional science, 2019, 6(1): 55-69. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2018.1562367
[11]	CAPPELLANO F, MAKKONEN T. Cross-border regional innovation ecosystems: the role of non-profit organizations in cross-border cooperation at the US-Mexico border[J]. Geo journal, 2020, 85(6): 1515-1528. doi: 10.1007/s10708-019-10038-w
[12]	叶林, 宋星洲. 粤港澳大湾区区域协同创新系统: 基于规划纲要的视角[J]. 行政论坛, 2019, 26(3): 87-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2019.03.013
[13]	李林威, 刘帮成. 区域协同发展政策能否提升城市创新水平?——基于粤港澳大湾区的准自然实验[J]. 经济问题探索, 2022(10): 77-93.
[14]	叶超, 柴彦威, 张小林. "空间的生产"理论、研究进展及其对中国城市研究的启示[J]. 经济地理, 2011, 31(3): 409-413.
[15]	亨利·列斐伏尔. 空间的生产[M]. 刘怀玉, 等, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2021: 50.
[16]	大卫·哈维. 资本的城市化[M]. 董慧, 译. 苏州: 苏州大学出版社, 2017: 58-59.
[17]	胡剑双, 孙经纬. 国家—区域尺度重组视角下的长三角区域治理新框架探析[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2020(5): 55-61.
[18]	MARSTON S A. The social construction of scale[J]. Progress in human geography, 2000, 24(2): 219-242. doi: 10.1191/030913200674086272
[19]	高恩新. 事权分化、尺度重构与权威嵌入: 开发区管理体制变迁的三重逻辑[J]. 行政论坛, 2021, 28(3): 51-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2021.03.008
[20]	晁恒, 马学广, 李贵才. 尺度重构视角下国家战略区域的空间生产策略——基于国家级新区的探讨[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(5): 1-8.
[21]	殷洁, 罗小龙, 肖菲. 国家级新区的空间生产与治理尺度建构[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(3): 89-96.
[22]	肖菲, 殷洁, 罗小龙, 等. 国家级新区空间生产研究——以南京江北新区为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2019(1): 42-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2019.01.007
[23]	曹文泽. 论国家级新区空间生产的政治性——基于区域重大战略实施的视角[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 30(6): 14-21.
[24]	王佃利, 于棋, 王庆歌. 尺度重构视角下国家级新区发展的行政逻辑探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2016(8): 41-47.
[25]	陈瑞莲, 杨爱平. 从区域公共管理到区域治理研究: 历史的转型[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012(2): 48-57.
[26]	张衔春, 唐承辉, 岳文泽. 地域重构视角下区域空间生产与治理——以深汕特别合作区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2022, 42(3): 373-380.
[27]	张京祥, 耿磊, 殷洁, 等. 基于区域空间生产视角的区域合作治理——以江阴经济开发区靖江园区为例[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1): 5-9.
[28]	包亚明主编. 后现代性与地理学的政治[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2001: 31.
[29]	王雨, 张京祥, 王梓懿, 等. "城市—区域"背景下香港北部都会区的尺度重构和跨界治理转型[J]. 国际城市规划, 2024, 39(3): 109-117.
[30]	MAKKONEN T, WEIDENFELD A, WILLIAMS A M. Cross-border regional innovation system integration: an analytical framework[J]. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 2017, 108(6): 805-820. http://findresearcher.sdu.dk/portal/files/143106966/Cross_border_regional_innovation_system_integration.pdf
[31]	杨耀武, 张仁开. 长三角产业集群协同创新战略研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(S2): 136-139.
[32]	LI Y, PHELPS N A. Megalopolitan glocalization: the evolving relational economic geography of intercity knowledge linkages within and beyond china's Yangtze River Delta region, 2004—2014[J]. Urban geography, 2019, 40(9): 1310-1334. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1585140
[33]	崔新健, 崔志新. 多区域协同创新演化路径研究——构建3×3区域协同创新模式[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2018(3): 53-62.
[34]	YANG Y, MA G. How can HSR promote inter-city collaborative innovation across regional borders?[J]. Cities, 2023, 138: 104367. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104367
[35]	姚尚建. 边界控制中的城市权力[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2015(6): 23-25.
[36]	黄柔柔, 洪世键. "空间—权力"动态匹配: 尺度跃迁视野下珠三角地方政区空间治理模式与变革展望[J]. 公共行政评论, 2020, 13(4): 41-57.
[37]	爱德华·W. 苏贾. 后现代地理学重申批判社会理论中的空间[M]. 王文斌, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004: 145.
[38]	HOFMANN S C, PAWLAK P. Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations[J]. Review of international political economy, 2023, 30(6): 2122-2149.
[39]	张京祥, 王雨. "制度距离"对区域一体化的作用机制及其治理应对——来自全球大都市区治理的经验与启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2023, 38(5): 56-65.
[40]	GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American journal of sociology, 1985, 91(3): 481-510. http://www.stanford.edu/group/scspi/_media/pdf/Classic_Media/Granovetter_1985_Social%20Networks.pdf
[41]	GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American journal of sociology, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380. http://rsa.tandfonline.com/servlet/linkout?suffix=CIT0052&dbid=16&doi=10.1080%2F00343400701624494&key=10.1086%2F225469
[42]	稳步提升!成渝地区协同创新总指数三年增长57.07%[EB/OL]. (2024-01-02)[2024-07-03]. https://www.cq.gov.cn/zt/cydqscjjq/chscjjhjjq/202401/t20240102_12775267.html.
[43]	姚尚建. 城市权力的逻辑展开[J]. 学习与实践, 2014(4): 69-75.
[44]	BOSCHMA R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment[J]. Regional studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ron_Boschma/publication/24087849_Proximity_and_Innovation_A_Critical_Assessment/links/00b7d522efd62b15ba000000/Proximity-and-Innovation-A-Critical-Assessment.pdf

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (9) PDF downloads (1)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Spatial Production and Mechanism of Cross-Regional Collaborative Innovation in State-Level New Area——A Case Study Based on the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content