Clustering by Class in the Direct Social Co-optation in Grass-roots Social Governance: A Case Study of WeChat Mobilization in L Town of G Province

LIU Hongbo; LIN Bin

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2021 > (4): 101-114.

LIU Hongbo, LIN Bin. Clustering by Class in the Direct Social Co-optation in Grass-roots Social Governance: A Case Study of WeChat Mobilization in L Town of G Province[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2021, (4): 101-114.

Citation:

PDF (2182 KB)

Clustering by Class in the Direct Social Co-optation in Grass-roots Social Governance: A Case Study of WeChat Mobilization in L Town of G Province

LIU Hongbo,
LIN Bin

More Information

Received Date: April 05, 2021
Available Online: September 02, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Social co-optation mechanism is an important institutional design in national governance system. With the popularization and application of social media, compared with the absorption of social organizations and social elites, there is a positive trend in the absorption mechanism for ordinary people. By observing the operation process of L town using WeChat group to carry out social mobilization, this paper analyzes the operation mechanism of administrative co-optation of the public. The absorption mode for ordinary people is defined as "direct connection absorption", which shows that a "group" forms by "class", namely, the "common law" is used to find reliable "own people". It is found that there is a "differential order pattern" in social co-optation, which forms a progressive process of "quasi-administrators-active cooperators-subordinates to managers". The core operation mechanism is an infiltration mechanism and an elimination mechanism. Through identity recognition and behavior identification, we can find "our own people" among ordinary people with the purpose of infiltrating into the society to grasp the real information or help to complete some things. "Social co-optation 2.0" in the new media society is obviously different from the traditional co-optation mode and provides a new analytical perspective for creating good interaction between the state and the society.
- social co-optation,
- "own people" effect,
- direct connection co-optation,
- WeChat group,
- social co-optation 2.0

FullText(HTML)

References (33)

References

[1]	谢秋山. 地方政府职能堕距与社会公共领域治理困境——基于广场舞冲突案例的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2015, 12(3): 23-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL201503003.htm
[2]	康晓光, 韩恒. 分类控制: 当前中国大陆国家与社会关系研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2005, 20(6): 73-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ200506002.htm
[3]	唐文玉. 行政吸纳服务——中国大陆国家与社会关系的一种新诠释[J]. 公共管理学报, 2010, 7(1): 13-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL201001005.htm
[4]	敬乂嘉. 控制与赋权: 中国政府的社会组织发展策略[J]. 学海, 2016, 27(1): 22-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2016.01.003
[5]	吕纳. 公共服务购买中政府制度逻辑与行动策略研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2016, 9(4): 45-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2016.04.004
[6]	郁建兴, 沈永东. 调适性合作: 十八大以来中国政府与社会组织关系的策略性变革[J]. 政治学研究, 2017, 28(3): 34-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-POLI201703004.htm
[7]	陈天祥, 应优优. 甄别性吸纳: 中国国家与社会关系的新常态[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 58(2): 178-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSDS201802019.htm
[8]	程坤鹏, 徐家良. 从行政吸纳到策略性合作: 新时代政府与社会组织关系的互动逻辑[J]. 治理研究, 2018, 25(6): 76-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9092.2018.06.016
[9]	拜茹, 尤光付. 自主性与行政吸纳合作: 乡村振兴中基层社会治理模式的机制分析[J]. 青海社会科学, 2019, 40(1): 72-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHSH201901011.htm
[10]	吴业苗. 行政化抑或行政吸纳: 民生服务下政府参与村级治理策略[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2020, 41(4): 69-78. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHKX202004009.htm
[11]	侯利文. 行政吸纳社会: 国家渗透与居委会行政化[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 36(2): 112-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-260X.2019.02.014
[12]	吕德文. 乡村治理空间再造及其有效性——基于W镇乡村治理实践的分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2018, 39(5): 96-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201805007.htm
[13]	宋锴业, 徐雅倩. "社会吸纳"何以失效?——一个国家项目运作过程的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2019, 16(3): 86-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL201903008.htm
[14]	ROJANAMON P, CHAISOMPHOB T, BUREEKUL T. Public participation in development of small infrastructure projects[J]. Sustainable development, 2012, 20(5): 320-334. doi: 10.1002/sd.473
[15]	肖荣春. 微信群的"社会互助"与"故事讲述"——一项基于美国华人社区微信群的探索性研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2018, 25(1): 66-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YANJ201801006.htm
[16]	陈力丹, 邵甜甜. 从传播角度看"自己人效应"[J]. 现代视听, 2012, 11(11): 23-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STSD201211009.htm
[17]	黄光国. 人情与面子[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 1985, 1(3): 55-62. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJSH198503016.htm
[18]	宋丽娜, 田先红. 论圈层结构——当代中国农村社会结构变迁的再认识[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 28(1): 109-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-508X.2011.01.011
[19]	邓大才. 均衡行政与自治: 农村基本建制单位选择逻辑[J]. 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报, 2019, 23(1): 35-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXB201901006.htm
[20]	吴高辉. 国家治理转变中的精准扶贫——中国农村扶贫资源分配的解释框架[J]. 公共管理学报, 2018, 15(4): 113-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGGL201804010.htm
[21]	陈军亚, 王琦. 集体化时期的国家渗透与农民回应——以"结构中的行为主义"为分析框架[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 60(1): 17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2456.2021.01.004
[22]	侯利文. 行政吸纳社会: 国家渗透与居委会行政化[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 36(2): 112-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-260X.2019.02.014
[23]	徐勇. "行政下乡": 动员、任务与命令——现代国家向乡土社会渗透的行政机制[J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2007, 46(5): 2-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2456.2007.05.002
[24]	袁明宝. 扶贫吸纳治理: 精准扶贫政策执行中的悬浮与基层治理困境[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(3): 57-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NJNS201803007.htm
[25]	王德福. 论熟人社会的交往逻辑[J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 45(3): 79-85. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNSF201303011.htm
[26]	陈柏峰. 熟人社会: 村庄秩序机制的理想型探究[J]. 社会, 2011, 31(1): 223-241. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHEH201101012.htm
[27]	BRIONES R L, KUCH B, LIU B F, et al. Keeping up with the digital age: how the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships[J]. Public relations review, 2011, 37(1): 37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
[28]	关婷, 薛澜, 赵静. 技术赋能的治理创新: 基于中国环境领域的实践案例[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019, 26(4): 58-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXGL201904020.htm
[29]	文宏, 林彬. 应急需求、技术赋能与政务服务创新——对"健康码"数据流转的考察[J]. 电子政务, 2021, 18(1): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZZW202101003.htm
[30]	ZAMMUTO R F, GRIFFITH T L, MAJCHRZAK A, et al. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization[J]. Organization science, 2007, 18(5): 749-762. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
[31]	孟天广. 政府数字化转型的要素、机制与路径———兼论"技术赋能"与"技术赋权"的双向驱动[J]. 治理研究, 2021, 37(1): 5-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9092.2021.01.002
[32]	SAXTON G D, GUO S C, BROWN W A. New dimensions of nonprofit responsiveness: the application and promise of Internet-based technologies[J]. Public performance & management review, 2007, 31(2): 144-173. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=31204617&site=ehost-live
[33]	刘红波, 王郅强. 城市治理转型中的市民参与和政府回应——基于广州市150个政府热线沟通案例的文本分析[J]. 新视野, 2018, 34(2): 94-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XISY201802014.htm

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

周一凡. 王安石书迹叙录. 碑林论丛. 2023(00): 259-271 .

Other cited types(0)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (727) PDF downloads (76) Cited by(1)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Clustering by Class in the Direct Social Co-optation in Grass-roots Social Governance: A Case Study of WeChat Mobilization in L Town of G Province

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(1)

Other cited types(0)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content