• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
CHEN Tian-xiang, WANG Ying. Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (5): 57-69.
Citation: CHEN Tian-xiang, WANG Ying. Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (5): 57-69.

Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance

More Information
  • Received Date: March 15, 2020
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • For a period of time, the administrative and bureaucratic transformations have occurred in self-governing mass organizations, which play the role of public agents in grassroots society. Due to the institutional inertia left by the administrative reform and the long-term accumulated custom meta-system in local society, non-government organizations still face the problem of embedded tension in the process of social governance. Based on the discussion of "embeddedness" and "soft governance", this article uses the term "soft embeddedness" to summarize the logic of the fit between the cultural community constructed by the New Rural Gentry group and the behavior of grassroots governments. The findings of the study are as follows: loose authoritarian policies provide space for the collective action of the cultural community; the value identity and status identity in the cultural community drive individual subjects to participate in collective action, and affect the political life of grassroots society through the informal cultural value system; the administrative institutions represented by local governments use behavior-oriented and behavior-attributed methods to maintain the new public order formed on the basis of cultural bonds, and then construct a new pattern of grassroots social governance with equal status among subjects, mutual embedding of order norms and diversified evaluation methods for results.
  • [1]
    严火其, 刘畅.乡村文化振兴:基层软治理与公共性建构的契合逻辑[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2):46-51. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/81471X/20192/7001508340.html
    [2]
    黄冬娅.多管齐下的治理策略:国家建设与基层治理变迁的历史图景[J].公共行政评论, 2010(3):111-140. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/71135x/201107/35833911.html
    [3]
    景跃进.中国农村基层治理的逻辑转换——国家与乡村社会关系的再思考[J].中共浙江省党校学报, 2018(1):48-57.
    [4]
    周庆智.改革与转型:中国基层治理四十年[J].政治学研究, 2019(1):43-52. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-POLI201901004.htm
    [5]
    付志虎.城乡二元户籍制度惯性与农民市民化行为选择[J].农村经济, 2019(1):97-103. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ncjj201901015
    [6]
    SCHLICHT E. On custom in the economy[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998:2.
    [7]
    杨开峰, 何艳玲, 郁建兴.如何建设社会治理共同体[N].浙江日报, 2019-11-13.
    [8]
    塞缪尔·P.亨廷顿.变动社会的政治秩序[M].张岱云, 聂振雄, 石浮, 等译.上海: 上海译文出版社, 1989: 3.
    [9]
    HAKEN H. Synergetics, an introduction: nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983:37-50.
    [10]
    范逢春, 谭淋丹.城市基层治理70年:从组织化、失组织化到再组织化[J].上海行政学院学报, 2019(5):14-23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SHXY201905002.htm
    [11]
    张雪, 甘甜.软嵌入:社会组织参与扶贫的行动逻辑——基于H组织的案例研究[J].中国非营利评论, 2019(1):172-191. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-PFEY201901010.htm
    [12]
    黄晓春, 嵇欣.非协同治理与策略性应对——社会组织自主性研究的一个理论框架[J].社会学研究, 2014(6):98-123. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=662725153
    [13]
    姚华.NGO与政府合作中的自主性何以可能?——以上海YMCA为个案[J].社会学研究, 2013(1):21-42. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SHXJ201301003.htm
    [14]
    阳信生.明清绅士制度初探[J].船山学刊, 2007(1):97-100. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=csxk200701028
    [15]
    张广利.社会生活共同体就是社区组织吗[N].解放日报, 2007-11-01.
    [16]
    GIDDENS A. The consequences of modernity[M]. Cambridge, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2013:21-22.
    [17]
    NYE J S JR. Soft power: the means to success in world politics[M]. New York:Public Affairs, 2004:6-8.
    [18]
    彭振.民族习惯法在乡村善治中的地位和功能[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017(3):147-152. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gxmzxyxb-zxsh201703024
    [19]
    阿列克斯·英克尔斯, 戴维·H.史密斯.从传统人到现代人——六个发展中国家中的个人变化[M].顾昕, 译.北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1992: 3-4.
    [20]
    王列生.国家公共文化服务体系论[M].北京:文化艺术出版社, 2009:276.
    [21]
    ROBERT M MACIVER. Community: a sociological study, being an attempt to set out native & fundamental laws[M]. London: Frank Cass & Co. LTD., 2012:3-5.
    [22]
    ROSENBERG G. The squaring of the warm circle-bernadotte in palestime[C] //Rethinking the Nation State. October 1999, Florence[2020-02-20]. https: //www.rosenberg.se/new-page-46.
    [23]
    徐春光.公共文化服务的"软治理"要义与发展逻辑[J].学习与实践, 2016(8):63-68. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xxysj201608008
    [24]
    刘志辉, 杨书文.政府购买社会组织公共服务的公共性论纲[J].理论月刊, 2019(10):116-123. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=llyk201910015
    [25]
    刘勇.论中国特色社会主义生态文明的认识维度[J].湖北社会科学, 2016(1):20-24. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hbshkx201601003
    [26]
    PETER B. EVANS. Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: a comparative political economy perspective on the third world state[J]. Sociological forum, 1989(4):561-587. http://www.springerlink.com/content/x7532461177l4r82
    [27]
    曼瑟尔·奥尔森.集体行动的逻辑[J].陈郁, 郭宇峰, 李崇新, 译.上海: 上海人民出版社, 2003: 41, 192-193.
    [28]
    卡尔·波兰尼.大转型: 我们时代的政治与经济起源[J].冯钢, 刘阳, 译.杭州: 浙江人民出版社2007: 15-16.
    [29]
    MARK GRANOVETTER. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. American journal of sociology, 1985, 91 (3):481-510. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=29c4a316653e48fd76f2806e7eda3fdc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [30]
    陈锋.论基层政权的"嵌入性治理":基于鲁中东村的实地调研[J].青年研究, 2011(1):23-32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-QNYJ201101004.htm
    [31]
    唐兴军.嵌入性治理: 国家与社会关系视阈下的行业协会研究——以上海有色金属行业协会为个案[D].上海: 华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2016: 80-81. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10269-1016141458.htm
    [32]
    许源源, 左代华.乡村治理中的内生秩序:演进逻辑、运行机制与制度嵌入[J].农业经济问题, 2019(8):9-18. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96316X/201908/7100060159.html
    [33]
    周雪光.从"黄宗羲定律"到帝国的逻辑:中国国家治理逻辑的历史线索[J].开放时代, 2014(4):108-132. http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=50249988
    [34]
    吴理财, 解胜利.文化治理视角下的乡村文化振兴:价值耦合与体系建构[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1):16-23. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_hznydxxb-shkxb201901004.aspx
    [35]
    周彦每.公共文化治理的价值旨归与建构逻辑[J].湖北社会科学, 2016(7):40-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hbshkx201607006
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 任志锋,刘阳. 人工智能与思想政治教育的深度融合论要. 马克思主义理论教学与研究. 2025(01): 76-85 .
    2. 汪广荣,王国庆. “大思政课”视角下多元主体交互协同育人机制研究. 盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版). 2025(01): 71-77 .
    3. 罗江华,沈菊,李宏展. 数智时代大学生主体性困境及重塑路径. 东北大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(02): 137-142 .
    4. 孙梦圆,陈华洲. 思想政治教育过程中信息获取的不确定性研究. 南阳师范学院学报. 2024(02): 81-84 .
    5. 王丹华,李海峰,孟宝兴. 数智时代的精神危机与教育应对. 当代教育科学. 2024(06): 13-22 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article views (2220) PDF downloads (76) Cited by(8)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return