Mixed Ownership Reform, Risk Taking and Innovation Performance——Evidence from A-Share State-Owned Enterprises Listed Companies

ZHAO Yan; HUANG Jialan; ZHAO Libin; ZHOU Fangfang

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2023 > (2): 124-137.

ZHAO Yan, HUANG Jialan, ZHAO Libin, ZHOU Fangfang. Mixed Ownership Reform, Risk Taking and Innovation Performance——Evidence from A-Share State-Owned Enterprises Listed Companies[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (2): 124-137.

Citation:

PDF (2038 KB)

Mixed Ownership Reform, Risk Taking and Innovation Performance——Evidence from A-Share State-Owned Enterprises Listed Companies

More Information

Received Date: December 26, 2022
Available Online: May 23, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

How to stimulate the vitality of state-owned enterprises and promote the high-quality development of China's economy is the current social concern. From the perspective of enterprise risk taking, this paper uses the data of A-share state-owned listed companies from 2003 to 2018, to investigate the relationship of mixed ownership reform, risk taking and innovation performance. The empirical results show that the mixed ownership reform has a significant positive correlation with the risk taking. The mechanism test found that the mixed ownership reform mainly affected the risk taking by reducing the agency cost of enterprises. Specifically, the effect of mixed ownership reform in improving risk taking is more significant in state-owned enterprises that have introduced private capital and those in regions with a high degree of marketization. Further research shows that the risk-taking level promoted by the mixed-ownership reform significantly increases the innovation input of enterprises but does not significantly promote the innovation output of enterprises. The results of this paper imply that in the process of mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises, a performance appraisal mechanism centered on innovation performance should be constructed to promote the formation of risk-taking preferences that are conducive to innovation activities and to promote high-quality development of state-owned enterprises.
- mixed ownership reform,
- risk taking,
- agency costs,
- innovation performance

FullText(HTML)

References (38)

References

[1]	梁上坤, 徐灿宇, 司映雪. 混合所有制程度与公司违规行为[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(8): 138-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJGU202008009.htm
[2]	胡艳, 陈肖兰, 张坤, 等. 混合所有制、董事会效率与企业非效率投资[J]. 投资研究, 2020, 39(6): 36-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZYJ202006004.htm
[3]	任广乾, 冯瑞瑞, 田野. 混合所有制、非效率投资抑制与国有企业价值[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(4): 174-183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRK202004016.htm
[4]	叶松勤, 凌方, 廖飞梅. 混合所有制、政府控制层级与企业费用粘性[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(1): 202-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYGL202001020.htm
[5]	陈良银, 黄俊, 陈信元. 混合所有制改革提高了国有企业内部薪酬差距吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(5): 150-162. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKGP202105016.htm
[6]	任广乾, 徐瑞, 刘莉等. 制度环境、混合所有制改革与国有企业创新[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 1-20. DOI: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20220512.1141.002.html.
[7]	狄灵瑜, 步丹璐. 混合所有制改革制度背景下异质性大股东对企业创新投入的影响——基于国有企业和非国有企业的比较分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(4): 152-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YJYF202104013.htm
[8]	冯璐, 张泠然, 段志明. 混合所有制改革下的非国有股东治理与国企创新[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(3): 124-140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRK202103012.htm
[9]	庄莹, 买生. 国企混改对企业社会责任的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11): 118-128. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KYGL202111014.htm
[10]	倪宣明, 贺英洁, 彭方平, 等. 混合所有制改革对国有企业盈利水平影响及作用路径研究[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(2): 33-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWGD202202003.htm
[11]	JOHN K, LITOV L, YEUNG B. Corporate governance and risk-taking[J]. Journal of finance, 2008, 63(4): 1679-1728. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x
[12]	DHILLON A, ROSSETTO S. Ownership structure, voting, and risk[J]. The review of financial studies, 2015, 28(2): 521-560. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhu071
[13]	杨瑞龙, 王元, 聂辉华. "准官员"的晋升机制: 来自中国央企的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2013(3): 23-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201303006.htm
[14]	金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 宣扬. "不作为"或"急于表现": 企业投资中的政治动机[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(10): 126-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201610011.htm
[15]	BOUBAKRI N, COSSET J C, SAFFAR W. Corporate risk-taking in privatized firms: international evidence on the role of state and foreign owners[J]. Cahiers de recherche, 2011, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/46923591.pdf.
[16]	李文贵, 余明桂. 所有权性质、市场化进程与企业风险承担[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(12): 115-127. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201212012.htm
[17]	陈东, 董也琳. 中国混合所有制经济生产率测度及变动趋势研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2014(6): 33-43. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYG201406006.htm
[18]	杜兴强, 曾泉, 杜颖洁. 政治联系、过度投资与公司价值——基于国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2011(8): 93-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRYJ201108010.htm
[19]	赵立彬, 赵妍. 高管年龄与公司并购——基于政治晋升激励视角[J]. 投资研究, 2016, 35(7): 58-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TZYJ201607006.htm
[20]	张辉, 黄昊, 闫强明. 混合所有制改革、政策性负担与国有企业绩效——基于1999—2007年工业企业数据库的实证研究[J]. 经济学家, 2016(9): 32-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXJ201609005.htm
[21]	李增福, 云锋, 黄家惠, 等. 国有资本参股对非国有企业投资效率的影响研究[J]. 经济学家, 2021(3): 71-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXJ202103009.htm
[22]	李明敏, 李秉祥, 惠祥. 异质股东控制权配置对企业混改绩效的影响——基于股东资源与治理结构双视角[J]. 预测, 2020, 39(1): 26-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YUCE202001004.htm
[23]	余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019(4): 75-91. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRYJ201904005.htm
[24]	宋春霞, 薛月. 不同风险特征下国企混改对企业创新绩效的影响——资源效应与制度效应视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(3): 73-82. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJB202303008.htm
[25]	潘红波, 余明桂. 政治关系、控股股东利益输送与民营企业绩效[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(4): 14-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKGP201004003.htm
[26]	吴延兵. 不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J]. 产业经济研究, 2014(2): 53-64. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYJJ201402006.htm
[27]	王春燕, 褚心, 朱磊. 非国有股东治理对国企创新的影响研究——基于混合所有制改革的证据[J]. 证券市场导报, 2020(11): 23-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQDB202011003.htm
[28]	何瑛, 杨琳. 改革开放以来国有企业混合所有制改革: 历程、成效与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 44-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ202107007.htm
[29]	解维敏, 方红星. 金融发展、融资约束与企业研发投入[J]. 金融研究, 2011(5): 171-183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JRYJ201105015.htm
[30]	李韵, 丁林峰. 员工持股计划、集体激励与企业创新[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 46(7): 35-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJYJ202007004.htm
[31]	陈德球, 金雅玲, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、政治关联与企业创新效率[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(4): 27-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LKGP201604004.htm
[32]	黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201604005.htm
[33]	杨兴全, 尹兴强. 国企混改如何影响公司现金持有?[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(11): 93-107. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201811009.htm
[34]	毛志宏, 李丽. 党组织嵌入、代理成本与非效率投资——基于国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理, 2022, 44(10): 1-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DJGL202210005.htm
[35]	郝阳, 龚六堂. 国有、民营混合参股与公司绩效改进[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(3): 122-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ201703010.htm
[36]	温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J]. 心理学报, 2004(5): 614-620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLXB200405016.htm
[37]	ANG J S, COLE R A, LIN J W. Agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of finance, 2000, 55(1): 81-106.
[38]	苏坤. 国有金字塔层级对公司风险承担的影响——基于政府控制级别差异的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(6): 127-143. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGYY201606010.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (236) PDF downloads (65)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Mixed Ownership Reform, Risk Taking and Innovation Performance——Evidence from A-Share State-Owned Enterprises Listed Companies

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content