The Perception of a Harmonious Society: Double Effects of Objective Security and Subjective Security

LI Shenghui; KUANG Huanjun

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (4): 96-109.

LI Shenghui, KUANG Huanjun. The Perception of a Harmonious Society: Double Effects of Objective Security and Subjective Security[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (4): 96-109.

Citation:

PDF (3607 KB)

The Perception of a Harmonious Society: Double Effects of Objective Security and Subjective Security

More Information

Received Date: December 11, 2020
Available Online: August 09, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The sense of a harmonious society is the subjective feeling of the masses about the construction of a harmonious society. Paying attention to it is conducive to better meeting the needs of residents for a better life and improving the level of social governance. The field theory is adopted to anlyze the degree of security, and the MIMIC model is used to analyze the dual effects of subjective security and objective security on the sense of a harmonious society. The empirical results show that the mean score of national harmonious society sense is 3.39, and the weighted factor score is 14.01, only 67.5% of the maximum scale score. The self-assessed socio-economic status, social medical insurance and endowment insurance have significantly positive effects on the sense of a harmonious society, and the effect of self-assessed socio-economic status is always higher than that of the other two factors. At the same time, societal fairness, life happiness and increasing age can significantly increase the sense of a harmonious society while increasing income and education level decrease it.
- medical insurance,
- endowment insurance,
- self-assessed socio-economic status,
- the sense of a harmonious society,
- field theory

FullText(HTML)

References (27)

References

[1]	朱力. 对"和谐社会"的社会学解读[J]. 南京社会科学, 2005(1): 46-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2005.01.007
[2]	中国社会科学院课题组. 努力构建社会主义和谐社会[J]. 中国社会科学, 2005(3): 4-16. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSHK200503001.htm
[3]	林卡. 社会质量理论: 研究和谐社会建设的新视角[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2010(2): 105-111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRDX201002015.htm
[4]	苏君阳. 和谐社会教育公平的基本特征与原则[J]. 高等教育研究, 2011(12): 10-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HIGH201112003.htm
[5]	霍添琪, 孙晓宇, 孙佳璐, 等. 和谐社会下医患关系现状分析及对策探讨[J]. 中国医疗管理科学, 2016(2): 66-69. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YLGL201602018.htm
[6]	刘铁明, 罗友花. 中国和谐劳动关系研究综述[J]. 马克思主义与现实, 2007(6): 139-142. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MKSZ200706028.htm
[7]	陈跃, 占伟. 非政府组织在和谐社会治理中的角色和功能探索[J]. 行政论坛, 2013(1): 58-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-460X.2013.01.012
[8]	刘宏宇. 勒温的社会心理学理论评述[J]. 社会心理科学, 1998(1): 57-61.
[9]	LEWIN K. Defining the "field at a given time"[J]. Psychological review, 1943(50): 292-310.
[10]	LEWIN K. Field theory in social science[J]. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1951(11): 388-389.
[11]	BRUNSWIK E. Organismic achievement and environmental probability[J]. Psychology review, 1943(3): 255-272.
[12]	何文炯. 社会保险转型与商业保险发展[J]. 保险研究, 2010(7): 35-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYJ201007007.htm
[13]	韩烨. 社会保障视域下商业保险与社会保险互动机制的耦合协调度研究[J]. 税务与经济, 2019(5): 23-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWYJ201905004.htm
[14]	康萌萌, 刘素春. 中国商业保险和社会保险耦合协调关系及时空特征研究[J]. 保险研究, 2016(6): 90-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYJ201606010.htm
[15]	汪润泉. "社会养老"是否淡化了"子女责任"观念?——来自中国农村居民的经验证据[J]. 人口与经济, 2016(5): 105-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKJJ201605011.htm
[16]	王志刚, 周永刚, 朱艺云. "养儿防老"与"新农保": 替代还是互补——基于福建省厦门、漳州和龙岩三市的问卷调查[J]. 中国经济问题, 2013(6): 20-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJJW201306003.htm
[17]	周广肃, 李力行. 养老保险是否促进了农村创业[J]. 世界经济, 2016(11): 172-192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJJJ201611009.htm
[18]	张强. 我国社会保障参保行为对社会公平感知的效应分析——基于CGSS(2013)调查数据的logistic回归[J]. 中国物价, 2015(11): 88-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWJ201511027.htm
[19]	陈晨. 养老与医疗: 社会保险参保行为对社会公平感的影响研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(2): 38-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZND201902006.htm
[20]	孙猛, 芦晓珊. 空气污染、社会经济地位与居民健康不平等——基于CGSS的微观证据[J]. 人口学刊, 2019(6): 103-112. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKXK201906009.htm
[21]	黄倩, 李宽, 熊德平. 家庭社会经济地位与居民健康——基于生活方式和社会支持双重视角的研究[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2020, 36(7): 66-80. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YNCM202007007.htm
[22]	马默特, 冯星林, 王曲. 地位决定你的健康[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 25-60.
[23]	国家统计局课题组等. 和谐社会统计监测指标体系研究[J]. 统计研究, 2006(5): 23-29. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJYJ200605005.htm
[24]	张华. 论核心素养的内涵[J]. 全球教育展望, 2016(4): 10-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201604002.htm
[25]	邱皓芳, 林碧芳. 结构方程模型的原理与应用[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2012: 5-15.
[26]	ACOCK A C. Discovering structural equation modeling using stata[M]. TX: A stata press publication, 2013: 147.
[27]	阳义南. 民生公共服务的国民"获得感": 测量与解析——基于MIMIC模型的经验证据[J]. 公共行政评论, 2018, 11(5): 117-137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGXZ201805008.htm

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	周德水，王梦情. 失业保险对居民社会公平感的影响. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版). 2025(02): 120-129 .
2.	代懋. 新就业形态劳动者职业伤害保障的就业稳定效应探析. 中国人力资源开发. 2024(12): 113-129 .
3.	郭联欢，洪昕晨. 城市社会感知研究与应用进展. 中外建筑. 2023(06): 12-17 .
4.	李小进，张永保. 新发展阶段家庭体育高质量发展的契机、挑战及路径. 湖北体育科技. 2023(08): 665-669+675 .
5.	赵源，王岳. 高等特殊教育改革中的生态化思考. 现代特殊教育. 2023(20): 27-31 .

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (298) PDF downloads (68) Cited by(6)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

The Perception of a Harmonious Society: Double Effects of Objective Security and Subjective Security

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content