• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
GAO Ming-xuan. On the Legal Boundary between Justifiable Defense and Excessive Defense[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (1): 157-168.
Citation: GAO Ming-xuan. On the Legal Boundary between Justifiable Defense and Excessive Defense[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (1): 157-168.

On the Legal Boundary between Justifiable Defense and Excessive Defense

More Information
  • Received Date: November 02, 2019
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • There is a certain disconnection between the legislative provisions and the judicial application of justifiable defense system, so correctly activating and exercising the right of defense in accordance with the law has become a major pain point of the current judicial policies. In properly solving the judicial disputes between justifiable defense and excessive defense, it is necessary to start from the basic standpoint of giving priority to defense right, establish a favorable interpretation position and value orientation of defenders, appropriately relax the limitation of defense, and give necessary “tolerance” to excessive defense. Meanwhile, we should also explore the boundaries of excessive defense based on the legitimacy of defense, from the perspectives of the opposition between right and evil and the balance between legal and illegal. At the normative level, it is necessary to courageously get rid of all kinds of judicial misconceptions such as “results-only theory”, and make a comprehensive judgment on the two core elements of obviously exceeding the necessary limits and causing serious consequences from the perspective of behavior and results and based on the unity of subjectivity and objectivity, so as to achieve individual justice. Besides, there is no room for discussion of excessive defense in special defense.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(19)

    1. 申庆元,朱九龙,马锐锋,陶晓燕. 黄河流域水环境污染空间格局与跨域协同治理影响因素. 人民黄河. 2025(01): 97-103 .
    2. 王勇,曹银山. 数字赋能地方生态治理:机理及优化——以W市“数字河长”运行为例. 当代经济管理. 2025(03): 19-29 .
    3. 吴旭红. 跨域治理智能化:信息技术赋能区域环境治理的秩序重构与风险规避研究. 湖湘论坛. 2025(02): 12-23 .
    4. 张泓. 协同治理视域下人事档案数据化实践路径研究. 档案与建设. 2024(02): 95-100 .
    5. 宋敏,张雅莉,唐荣. 数字经济对水资源压力的影响及空间效应. 水利经济. 2024(04): 14-22 .
    6. 吴佳丽,杜春林. 跨界河湖的水资源冲突及合作治理机制——以石臼湖联合共治为例. 环境保护科学. 2024(04): 27-31 .
    7. 王琪,毛杨. 海洋生态环境跨部门协同中技术治理的效能与限度. 环境保护. 2024(12): 44-48 .
    8. 郑卜之,杨年鹏,陈胜. 水利“一张图”在水利工程划界管理中的应用. 北京测绘. 2024(08): 1193-1198 .
    9. 姚清晨,黄璜. 数字化赋能协同治理的过程机制研究——基于多案例分析. 甘肃行政学院学报. 2024(05): 91-99+127 .
    10. 潘子纯,朱玉春. 环境规制对村级河长政策执行力的影响. 中国人口·资源与环境. 2024(10): 137-149 .
    11. 张倩. 县域环境治理协同机制构建研究. 中国集体经济. 2023(03): 35-38 .
    12. 孙壮珍,高宇. 智慧技术赋能地方政府环境治理的运作机制研究——基于四川省M市的实践探索. 山东行政学院学报. 2023(02): 53-61 .
    13. 王龙,王娜,李辉,王娟. 内部横向视角下政府数据跨部门协同治理的过程分析. 电子政务. 2023(05): 76-87 .
    14. 章文光,王传飞. 界面治理视角下乡村网格化治理变革——基于党建引领全科网格化治理实践的分析. 社会治理. 2023(02): 16-29 .
    15. 曹志杰,蒋丽萍,李烁. 基本公共服务均等化中的政府部门间协调困难研究——基于SNA政策文本量化分析. 中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报. 2023(03): 71-80 .
    16. 李文钊,翟文康,刘文璋. “放管服”改革何以优化营商环境?——基于治理结构视角. 管理世界. 2023(09): 104-124 .
    17. 张宁,李海洋,张俊飚,汪子晨,江梦琪. 中国水环境协同治理的时空演化特征及影响因素——基于治水流程闭环与协同机制统筹的思考. 中国环境科学. 2023(12): 6763-6777 .
    18. 姜国俊,袁赞. 空气质量点长制的运作机理与治理逻辑——以C市Y区的空气质量点长制为例. 行政论坛. 2022(05): 127-137 .
    19. 颜海娜. 完善基层水环境治理体系需解决的几个问题. 国家治理. 2021(37): 30-36 .

    Other cited types(27)

Catalog

    Article views (3534) PDF downloads (169) Cited by(46)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return