Dual Effect of Leaders' High Performance Expectation on Employee Performance: Based on the Transactional Theory of Stress

ZHANG Jie; NIE Qi; WANG Zhen

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2020 > (6): 142-157.

ZHANG Jie, NIE Qi, WANG Zhen. Dual Effect of Leaders' High Performance Expectation on Employee Performance: Based on the Transactional Theory of Stress[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (6): 142-157.

Citation:

PDF (2277 KB)

Dual Effect of Leaders' High Performance Expectation on Employee Performance: Based on the Transactional Theory of Stress

More Information

Received Date: January 20, 2020
Available Online: March 21, 2021

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

High performance requirements of leaders reflect leaders' desire and expectation for high performance of employees. Based on the transactional theory of stress, proactive work behavior and work withdrawal behavior are two ways for employees to respond to high performance requirements of leaders. The employees' role breadth self-efficacy plays a moderating role in the above process, that is, it determines whether employees take proactive coping style or withdraw coping style, and these two coping styles have a completely opposite impact on employee performance. In this paper, 268 two-point supervisor-employee data were used to conduct path analysis, and the results show that for employees with high role breadth self-efficacy, leaders' high performance expectation has a positive impact on employees' job performance through employees' proactive work behavior; however, for employees with low role breadth self-efficacy, leaders' high performance expectation has a negative impact on employees' job performance through employees' work withdrawal behavior. This paper revealed the dual effect of leaders' high performance expectation from the perspective of contingency, which can provide inspiration for leaders to effectively set high performance requirements.
- leaders,
- high performance expectation,
- proactive work behavior,
- work withdrawal behavior,
- role breadth self-efficacy,
- employee performance

FullText(HTML)

References (48)

References

[1]	O'LEARY-KELLY A M, MARTOCCHIO J J, FRINK D D. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance[J]. Academy of management journal, 1994, 37(5): 285-301.
[2]	FAVERO N, MEIER K J, O'TOOLE L J. Goals, trust, participation, and feedback: linking internal management with performance outcomes[J]. Journal of public administration research & theory, 2016, 26(2): 327-343. http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/muu044v1
[3]	GAGNÉ M, DECI E L. Self-determination theory and work motivation[J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 2005, 26(4): 331-362. doi: 10.1002/job.322
[4]	陈默, 梁建.高绩效要求与亲组织不道德行为:基于社会认知理论的视角[J].心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 94-105. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/20171/671292690.html
[5]	WELSH D T, ORDÓÑEZ L D. The dark side of consecutive high performance goals: linking goal setting, depletion, and unethical behavior[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2014, 123(2): 79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.006
[6]	LAZARUS R S, FOLKMAN S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping[J]. European journal of personality, 1987, 1(3): 141-169. doi: 10.1002/per.2410010304
[7]	YUAN F, WOODMAN R W. Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations[J]. Academy of management journal, 2010, 53(2): 323-342. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
[8]	DAI H, DIETVORST B J, TUCKFIELD B, et al. Quitting when the going gets tough: a downside of high performance expectations[J]. Academy of management journal, 2018, 61(5): 1667-1691. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.1045
[9]	陈畅, 张喆, 贾明.组织延展性目标对员工情绪耗竭的影响机制研究:基于压力交易理论的视角[J].管理工程学报, 2019(3): 1-8. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=GLGU201903001
[10]	PARKER S K. Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1999, 83(6): 835-852. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9885197
[11]	刘淑桢, 叶龙, 郭名.工作不安全感如何成为创新行为的助推力——基于压力认知评价理论的研究[J].经济管理, 2019(11): 126-140. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=jjgl201911008
[12]	XU Q, ZHAO Y, XI M, et al. Impact of benevolent leadership on follower taking charge: roles of work engagement and role-breadth self-efficacy[J]. Chinese management studies, 2018, 12(4): 741-755. doi: 10.1108/CMS-03-2018-0448
[13]	PARKER S K, WILLIAMS H M, TURNER N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2006, 91(3): 636-652. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
[14]	PARKER S K, COLLINS C G. Taking stock: integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors[J]. Journal of management, 2010, 36(3): 633-662. doi: 10.1177/0149206308321554
[15]	FAY D, FRESE M. The concept of personal initiative: an overview of validity studies[J]. Human performance, 2001, 14(1): 97-124. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06
[16]	CANGIANO F, PARKER S K. Proactivity for mental health and well-being[C]//CLARKE S, GULDENMUND F, PASSMORE J, et al. The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of occupational health & safety. New York: Wiley Press, 2015: 228-250.
[17]	CANGIANO F, BINDL U, PARKER S K. The 'hot' side of proactivity: exploring an affect-based perspective on proactivity in organizations[C]//PARKER S K, BINDL U. Proactivity at work: making things happen in organizations. New York: Routledge, 2017: 355-384.
[18]	De VOS A, De CLIPPELEER I, DEWILDE T. Proactive career behaviours and career success during the early career[J]. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2009, 82(4): 761-777. doi: 10.1348/096317909X471013
[19]	MORRISON E W, PHELPS C C. Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change[J]. Academy of management journal, 1999, 42(4): 403-419. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-14436-002
[20]	张征, 李锦.员工主动变革行为:前因与后果.中国人力资源开发, 2019(5): 60-75. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZRZK201905007.htm
[21]	VAN DYNE L, LEPINE J A. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity[J]. Academy of management journal, 1998, 41(1): 108-119. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-00188-007
[22]	SCOTT S G, BRUCE R A. Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace[J]. Academy of management journal, 1994, 37(3): 580-607.
[23]	FRESE M, FAY D. Personal initiative: an active performance concept for work in the 21st century[C]// STAW B, SUTTON R. Research in organizational behavior. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2001: 133-187.
[24]	WEI X, ZHANG Z X, CHEN X P. I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: a moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2015, 100(5): 1641-1652. doi: 10.1037/a0039046
[25]	TIERNEY P, FARMER S M. Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2011, 96(2): 277-293. doi: 10.1037/a0020952
[26]	SPECTOR P E, FOX S, PENNEY L M, et al. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?[J]. Journal of vocational behavior, 2006, 68(3): 446-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005
[27]	于晓彤, 陈晓, 王赫.工作卑微感为何会导致工作退缩行为?消极情绪与工作疏离感的中介作用[J].中国人力资源开发, 2019, 36(6): 33-47. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgrlzykf201906004
[28]	LEHMAN W E, SIMPSON D D. Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 1992, 77(3): 309-321. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.3.309
[29]	BAKKER A B, DEMEROUTI E, VERBEKE W. Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance[J]. Human resource management, 2004, 43(1): 83-104. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=429c653d1e84b624c9172d6c69bc7ebf
[30]	VISWESVARAN C. Absenteeism and measures of job performance: a meta-analysis[J]. International journal of selection and assessment, 2002, 10(1-2): 12-17. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00190/full
[31]	ZIMMERMAN R D, DARNOLD T C. The impact of job performance on employee turnover intentions and the voluntary turnover process: a meta-analysis and path model[J]. Personnel review, 2009, 38(2): 142-158. doi: 10.1108/00483480910931316
[32]	WEI F, SI S. Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2013, 30(1): 281-296. doi: 10.1007/s10490-011-9251-y
[33]	LOUNT Jr R B, PETTIT N C, DOYLE S P, et al. Motivating underdogs and favorites[J]. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2017, 141: 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.06.003
[34]	SMART RICHMAN L, LEARY M R. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: a multimotive model[J]. Psychological review, 2009, 116(2): 365-383. doi: 10.1037/a0015250
[35]	BANDURA A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social-cognitive view[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986:523-582.
[36]	LI S L, HE W, YAM K C, et al. When and why empowering leadership increases followers' taking charge: a multilevel examination in China[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2015, 32(3): 645-670. doi: 10.1007/s10490-015-9424-1
[37]	NGUYEN H, JOHNSON A, COLLINS C, et al. Confidence matters: self-efficacy moderates the credit that supervisors give to adaptive and proactive role behaviours[J]. British journal of management, 2016, 28(2): 315-330.
[38]	王苗苗, 张捷.真实型领导对新生代员工创新行为的影响:内部人身份感知的中介作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2019(3): 127-141. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95119X/20193/7002206861.html
[39]	STRAUSS K, GRIFFIN M A, RAFFERTY A E. Proactivity directed toward the team and organization: the role of leadership, commitment and role-breadth self-efficacy[J]. British journal of management, 2009, 20(3): 279-291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00590.x
[40]	PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, MOORMAN R H, et al. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors[J]. The leadership quarterly, 1990, 1(2): 107-142. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
[41]	CHEN Z X, ARYEE S. Delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China[J]. Academy of management journal, 2007, 50(1): 226-238. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24162389
[42]	罗瑾琏, 胡文安, 钟竞.双元领导对新员工社会化适应与创新的双路径影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2016(12): 161-173. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=kxxykxjsgl201612015
[43]	PREACHER K J, ZYPHUR M J, ZHANG Z. A General multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation[J]. Psychological methods, 2010, 15(3): 209-233. doi: 10.1037/a0020141
[44]	CARMELI A, SCHAUBROECK J. The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work[J]. The leadership quarterly, 2007, 18(1): 35-48. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104898430600141X
[45]	MCNATT D B, JUDGE T A. Boundary conditions of the galatea effect: a field experiment and constructive replication[J]. Academy of management journal, 2004, 47(4): 550-565. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/274355346_Boundary_conditions_of_the_Galatea_effect_A_field_experiment_and_constructive_replication
[46]	MITCHELL M S, BAER M D, AMBROSE M L, et al. Cheating under pressure: a self-protection model of workplace cheating behavior[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2017, 103(1): 54-73. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28805425
[47]	MCNATT D B. Ancient pygmalion joins contemporary management: a meta-analysis of the result[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2000, 85(2): 314-322. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.314
[48]	GRIFFIN M A, PARKER S K, MASON C M. Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: a longitudinal study[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2010, 95(1): 174-182. doi: 10.1037/a0017263

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	刘良灿，林燕平，杨付. 高绩效要求的影响效果及其理论解释. 中国人力资源开发. 2025(03): 26-46 .
2.	徐燕，赵东东，张瑞娟，刘晓静. 分布式办公下工作无边界化与员工主动行为的“过犹不及”关系研究. 中国人力资源开发. 2024(01): 6-20 .
3.	赵修文，钱雪，刘雪梅，肖金岑，饶芳. 高绩效期望下的两种选择:反馈寻求还是反馈规避？. 中国人力资源开发. 2024(01): 35-50 .
4.	王松. 领导授权赋能对基层公务员职业成长的影响研究. 中国人事科学. 2024(01): 12-23 .
5.	周晓东，丁亦可. 高管认知风格、角色宽度自我效能感对创新导向的影响研究——基于制造业上市公司的实证分析. 南华大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(02): 43-54 .
6.	张丽丽，章政. 新时代我国教师师德考核评价体系研究：评价依据、借鉴与要件. 教育科学研究. 2024(07): 77-82 .
7.	李星新，王雁飞，朱瑜，郑立勋. 工作狂领导促进还是抑制员工创新行为？员工韧性的调节作用. 科学学与科学技术管理. 2024(09): 144-159 .
8.	杨凯乔，邓雁玲，李辉，徐士虎，耿维. 警察工作压力对工作形塑的影响：职业生涯韧性的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志. 2023(02): 226-232 .
9.	季正，徐世勇. 多任务处理与员工主动行为:工作意义感、悖论思维与挑战性评估的作用. 中国人力资源开发. 2023(04): 35-48 .
10.	董原，焦艳芳. 工作狂领导对下属工作绩效的双刃剑效应——基于资源保存理论视角. 内蒙古财经大学学报. 2023(02): 109-115 .
11.	李姜锦，刘春林，李虎. 领导“积极”的挑战性压力为何对员工创造力产生“消极”的影响?. 管理评论. 2023(07): 199-208 .
12.	张克英，蒋淼，曹家慧. 挑战-阻碍性压力源对创业者机会评估的影响机制研究. 管理现代化. 2023(04): 121-134 .
13.	夏莹，杜亚娜. 组织管理中的工作要求研究述评. 人力资源管理评论. 2023(01): 151-164 .
14.	李锡元，夏艺熙. 悖论式领导对员工适应性绩效的双刃剑效应——工作活力和角色压力的作用. 软科学. 2022(02): 104-109 .
15.	周恩毅，刘春雨. 家长式领导对员工绩效的影响——基于组织认同、工作平台的双重调节作用. 经营与管理. 2022(06): 107-113 .
16.	张娇娇，罗文豪. 组织行为研究中的双刃剑效应：典型模式与策略建议. 管理评论. 2022(09): 195-207 .
17.	姜福斌，王震. 压力认知评价理论在管理心理学中的应用：场景、方式与迷思. 心理科学进展. 2022(12): 2825-2845 .
18.	刘艳，江文琦，董雨菲. 低预期员工的印象管理行为模型构建. 中国人力资源开发. 2021(09): 6-18 .

Other cited types(60)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (4159) PDF downloads (278) Cited by(78)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Dual Effect of Leaders' High Performance Expectation on Employee Performance: Based on the Transactional Theory of Stress

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

Other cited types(60)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content