• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
Petar Jandrić, YAN Fei, XIAO Shao-ming. Educational Research in the Postdigital Age[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (6): 5-17.
Citation: Petar Jandrić, YAN Fei, XIAO Shao-ming. Educational Research in the Postdigital Age[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (6): 5-17.

Educational Research in the Postdigital Age

More Information
  • Received Date: May 19, 2020
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • Nowadays, educational research faces the challenge of big data and algorithms. Through automated processes of data collection and manipulation, big data and algorithmic processes have introduced new research opportunities. However, these opportunities are strongly limited by various data and algorithmic biases. Introducing new opportunities and limits, big data and algorithms have significantly transformed contemporary educational research. These transformations are dialectically intertwined with educational politics, policy, and practice. The complex interplay between ways we do research and ways we apply this research brings about a new set of philosophical, methodological, and practical questions and challenges. The paper outlines the main challenges of educational research in our messy, unpredictable, and constantly changing postdigital condition. Postdigital transformations in research, politics, policy, and practice are in permanent interaction and cannot be thought of without each other. In our postdigital age, educational researchers have an opportunity, and a responsibility, to lead these transformations in responsible and sustainable ways.
  • [1]
    ANDERSON C. The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete[EB/OL]. (2008-06-23)[2019-12-11]. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
    [2]
    CARR W, KEMMIS S. Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research[M]. Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis, 1986.
    [3]
    FUCHS C. From digital positivism and administrative big data analytics towards critical digital and social media research![J]. European journal of communication, 2017, 32(1):42-43.
    [4]
    KNOX J. Critical education and digital cultures[M]// PETERS M. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Singapore: Springer, 2015: 5.
    [5]
    CARR N. The shallows: what the Internet is doing to our brains[M]. New York: W. W. Norton, 2011.
    [6]
    RITZER G, MILES S. The changing nature of consumption and the intensification of McDonaldization in the digital age[J]. Journal of consumer culture, 2019, 19(9): 3-20.
    [7]
    FEENBERG A. Technosystem: the social life of reason[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
    [8]
    HARAWAY D. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature[M]. New York: Routledge, 1991/1985.
    [9]
    FLORIDI L. The Onlife Manifesto: being human in a hyperconnected era[M]. Springer Science:Business Media, 2015:2.
    [10]
    PETERS M A, JANDRIĆ P. Posthumanism, open ontologies and bio-digital becoming: response to Luciano Floridi's Onlife Manifesto[J]. Educational philosophy and theory, 2019(1):971-980.
    [11]
    HORKHEIMER M, ADORNO T W. Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments[M]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.
    [12]
    MARCUSE H. One-dimensional man[M]. Boston:Beacon Press, 1964:239.
    [13]
    HEIDEGGER M. 'Only a god can save us': the Spiegel interview[M]// SHEEHAN T. (Ed.) Heidegger: the man and the thinker. Chicago, IL: Precedent Press, 1981: 45-67.
    [14]
    STIEGLER B. Technoscience and reproduction[J]. Parallax, 2007, 13 (4): 29-45. doi: 10.1080/13534640701682784
    [15]
    FEENBERG A. Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited[M]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2002.
    [16]
    JANDRIĆ P. Learning in the age of digital reason[M]. Rotterdam: Sense, 2017.
    [17]
    JANDRIĆ P. The methodological challenge of networked learning: (post)disciplinarity and critical emancipation[M]// RYBERG T, SINCLAIR C, BAYNE S, et al. (Eds.) Research, boundaries, and policy in networked learning. New York: Springer, 2016: 165-181.
    [18]
    JANDRIĆ P, HAYES S. Who drives the drivers? Technology as ideology of global educational reform[M]// MEANS A, SALTMAN K. (Eds.) Handbook of global educational reform. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Black well, 2018.
    [19]
    HAYES S., JANDRIĆ P. Who is really in charge of contemporary education? People and technologies in, against and beyond the neoliberal university[J]. Open review of educational research, 2014, 1(1): 193-210. doi: 10.1080/23265507.2014.989899
    [20]
    HAYES S. The labour of words in higher education: is it time to reoccupy policy?[M]. Leiden and Boston: Brill Sense, 2019:168.
    [21]
    DAHLBERG L. Internet research tracings: towards non-reductionist methodology[J/OL]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2004, 9(3).https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00289.x.
    [22]
    JANDRIĆ P, BORAS D. (Eds.) Critical learning in digital networks[M]. New York: Springer, 2015.
    [23]
    NEGROPONTE N. Beyond digital[EB/OL]. Wired, (1998-01-12)[2019-01-25]. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.12/negroponte.html.
    [24]
    CASCONE K. The aesthetics of failure: 'post-digital' tendencies in contemporary computer music[J]. Computer music journal, 2000, 24(4): 12-18. doi: 10.1162/014892600559489
    [25]
    PEPPERELL R, PUNT M. The postdigital membrane: imagination, technology and desire[M]. Bristol: Intellect, 2000.
    [26]
    JANDRIĆ P, KNOX J, BESLEY T, et al. Postdigital science and education[J]. Educational philosophy and theory, 2018, 50(10): 893-899. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000
    [27]
    LEVINSON P. Needed: a "Post-Post" formulation[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019(1):14-16.
    [28]
    FEENBERG A. Postdigital or predigital?[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019(1):1-2.
    [29]
    SINCLAIR C, HAYES S. Between the post and the com-post: examining the postdigital 'work' of a prefix[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019, 1(1):119-131. doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0017-4
    [30]
    FAWNS T. Postdigital education in design and practice[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019, 1(1):132-145. doi: 10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8
    [31]
    WIENER N. Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1948/1985.
    [32]
    PETERS M A, BESLEY T. Critical philosophy of thepostdigital[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019(1):29-42.
    [33]
    NG A. Machine learning[EB/OL]. [2019-02-11]. https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning.
    [34]
    HARFORD T. Big data: a big mistake?[J]. Significance, 2014, 11(5): 14-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00778.x
    [35]
    BOYD D, CRAWFORD K. Critical questions for big data[J]. Information, communication and society, 2012, 15(5): 662-679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
    [36]
    JANDRIĆ P. The postdigital challenge of critical media literacy[J]. International journal of critical media literacy, 2019, 1(1):26-37. doi: 10.1163/25900110-00101002
    [37]
    KITCHIN R. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts[J]. Bigdata & society, 2014, 1(1): 1-12.
    [38]
    PETERS M A, JANDRIĆ P. The digital university: a dialogue and manifesto[M]. New York: Peter Lang, 2018.
    [39]
    SHADBOLT N, HALL W, HENDLER J A, et al. Web science: a new frontier[J/OL]. Philosophical transactions of the royal society, (2013-03-28)[2019-02-11]. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0512.
    [40]
    WILLIAMSON B. Brain data: scanning, scraping and sculpting the plastic learning brain through neurotechnology[J]. Postdigital science and education, 2019(1):65-88.
    [41]
    BEIRA E, FEENBERG A. (Eds.) Technology, modernity and democracy: essays by Andrew Feenberg[M]. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018: 26.
    [42]
    AESOP. The fox and the stork[EB/OL]. [2020-10-29]. https://fablesofaesop.com/the-fox-and-the-stork.html.
    [43]
    KNOX J. Posthumanism and the MOOC: contaminating the subject of global education[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
    [44]
    JONES C. Experience and networked learning[M]// BONDERUP D N, CRANMERJ S, SIME M A, et al. (Eds.) Networked learning: reflections and challenges. Springer international, 2018: 39-56.
    [45]
    MALONE T W, BERNSTEIN M S. Handbook of collective intelligence[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.
    [46]
    PETERS M A. Education, creativity and the economy of passions: new forms of educational capitalism[J]. Thesis eleven, 2009, 96(1):40-63. doi: 10.1177/0725513608099119
    [47]
    PETERS M A. Interview with Pierre A. Lévy, French philosopher of collective intelligence[J]. Open review of educational research, 2015(2):259-266.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(12)

    1. 王庭东,尹丽丽. 供应链数字化对企业国际化深度的影响研究. 亚太经济. 2025(01): 152-173 .
    2. 张翔,尹芳. 数字化转型与现金持有:基于企业创新的机制分析. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学). 2025(02): 84-104 .
    3. 蔡红义. 数字经济时代我国企业国际化过程中企业管理创新与文化输出研究. 中国商论. 2025(05): 152-155 .
    4. 闫慧奇. 服装企业数字化转型经营探索与研究. 天津纺织科技. 2024(01): 30-34 .
    5. 陈强. 谈加快推进企业数字化转型的有效措施. 商场现代化. 2024(07): 89-91 .
    6. 魏昀妍,柳春,施炳展,张一. 数字化转型如何助力中国企业高水平“走出去”. 当代财经. 2024(06): 111-123 .
    7. 童素娟,麻咏碧. 数字化转型对企业国际化速度的影响及政策建议——环境不确定性的调节作用. 浙江树人学院学报. 2024(03): 29-39 .
    8. 张双. 人工智能时代企业国际化发展战略研究. 老字号品牌营销. 2024(16): 196-198 .
    9. 刘立鹏,左兆迎,滕卉卉. 实验室铁矿石水分检测的数智化探究. 实验室检测. 2024(08): 56-60 .
    10. 赵浩兴,章一帆. 数字化转型对企业韧性的影响及其作用机制研究. 创新科技. 2024(11): 71-82 .
    11. 陈再齐,李德情. 数字化转型、双向信息不对称与中国企业跨境并购. 湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(06): 120-129 .
    12. 施思. 数字化转型如何驱动中国式产业链现代化——基于产业结构升级视角. 新疆社会科学. 2023(06): 33-42+167-168 .

    Other cited types(15)

Catalog

    Article views (3590) PDF downloads (172) Cited by(27)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return