"Fitness for Purpose": How the Accreditation of Teacher Education Programs Influences the View on Teacher Education Curricular Quality

WANG Hong; LUO Xiaodan

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (1): 31-40.

WANG Hong, LUO Xiaodan. "Fitness for Purpose": How the Accreditation of Teacher Education Programs Influences the View on Teacher Education Curricular Quality[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (1): 31-40.

Citation:

PDF (2369 KB)

"Fitness for Purpose": How the Accreditation of Teacher Education Programs Influences the View on Teacher Education Curricular Quality

WANG Hong¹,
LUO Xiaodan²

More Information

Received Date: October 17, 2021
Available Online: February 17, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

The view on teacher education curricular quality plays a leading role in the teacher education curriculum. The kind of view on the teacher education curricular quality determines the kind of teacher education curriculum. The view on teacher education curricular quality in China used to be " knowledge-based". Although helpful for normal students to consolidate their theoretical knowledge of education and teaching, it seldom considers the educational practice of normal students and thus fails to adapt to the development of elementary education. The implementation of teacher education program accreditation promotes the development of teacher education curriculum quality toward "fitness for purpose". Guided by this view, the standards for evaluating teacher education curricular quality and their practical application will change accordingly. Based on the relevant official documents of teacher education program accreditation, this research explores the potential shift of the view on teacher education curricular quality from being "knowledge-based" to "fitness for purpose" and its practical implications.
- teacher education program accreditation,
- fitness for purpose,
- view of teacher education curricular quality

FullText(HTML)

References (34)

References

[1]	胡惠闵, 崔允漷. 《教师教育课程标准》研制历程与问题回应[J]. 全球教育展望, 2012(6): 10-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201206004.htm
[2]	陈时见. 教师教育课程论[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2011: 212.
[3]	杨燕燕. 论教育实践课程[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2011: 6.
[4]	骆铮. 中美教师教育实践课程比较研究[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2012: 45-48.
[5]	《当代中国》丛书教育卷编辑室. 当代中国高等师范教育资料选(上册)[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 1986: 565.
[6]	李伟. 建国以来我国高师教育实习政策的演变[J]. 焦作大学学报, 2006(1): 96-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7257.2006.01.035
[7]	靳希斌. 教师教育模式研究[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2009: 30.
[8]	李友芝, 李春年, 柳传欣. 中国近现代师范教育史资料(第3册)[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 1983: 1127.
[9]	佚名. 国家教委要求大力发展和加强师范教育[J]. 人民教育, 1986(6): 9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RMJY198606004.htm
[10]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于大力推进教师教育课程改革的意见[EB/OL]. (2011-10-08)[2021-09-12]. http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6342/201110/xxgk_125722.html.
[11]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于加强师范生教育实践的意见[EB/OL]. (2016-03-21)[2021-09-12]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/201604/t20160407_237042.html.
[12]	唐纳德·A. 舍恩. 反映的实践者: 专业工作者如何在行动中思考[M]. 夏林清, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2007: 28.
[13]	鲁洁. 教育社会学[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1990: 471-474.
[14]	李梁. 师范院校教育实践课程探索——以温州大学小学教育专业为例[J]. 教育研究, 2017(4): 152-158. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201704022.htm
[15]	中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于印发《普通高等学校师范类专业认证实施办法(暂行)》的通知[EB/OL]. (2017-10-26)[2021-09-12]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7011/201711/t20171106_318535.html.
[16]	教育部教师工作司. 教育部教师工作司关于印发《职业技术师范教育专业认证标准》和《特殊教育专业认证标准》的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-10-10)[2021-09-12]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A10/tongzhi/201910/t20191030_405965.html.
[17]	教育部教师工作司, 教育部高等教育教学评估中心. 培养新时代大国良师——普通高等学校师范类专业认证工作指南[EB/OL]. (2018-06-27)[2021-09-12]. https://jxpj.jxnu.edu.cn/_upload/article/files/df/ea/94096ea54fda8e976c8a83a11871/6a6b34c2-7f87-4028-b01d-62a73-4256cf9.pdf.
[18]	王红. 师范类专业认证: 撬动师范教育内涵发展改革的支点[J]. 北京教育: 普教版, 2019(10): 44-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJYU201910030.htm
[19]	王艳玲. 教师教育课程论[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2011: 15.
[20]	韦成龙, 何旭明. 构建"一对接四合作三服务"体系提高人才培养能力[J]. 中国高等教育, 2018(8): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGDJ201808022.htm
[21]	SPADY W G. Choosing outcomes of significance[J]. Educational leadership, 1994(6): 18-22.
[22]	王金旭, 朱正伟, 李茂国. 成果导向: 从认证理念到教学模式[J]. 中国大学教学, 2017(6): 77-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2017.06.019
[23]	刘万海. 论课程评价范式发展的趋向与特征[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2002(1): 73-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJF200201022.htm
[24]	马万民. 试述高等教育质量观的演进与建构[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2007(4): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4233.2007.04.011
[25]	赵婷婷. 从精英到大众高等教育质量观的转变[J]. 江苏高教, 2002(1): 39-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8418.2002.01.010
[26]	BOGUE E G, SAUNDERS R L. The evidence for quality: strengthening the tests of academic and administrative effectiveness[M]. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1992: 323.
[27]	上海市教育评估院. 区域流动: 质量保障领域中的合作——亚太地区质量保障网络组织学术研讨会暨第二届年会综述[J]. 教育发展研究, 2006(9): 79-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2006.09.020
[28]	朱伟文, 李亚东. 试论专业认证推进大学质量文化建设的价值、局限和着力点[J]. 教育发展研究, 2020(7): 43-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGJ202007010.htm
[29]	李亚东. 质量保障: 从管治到治理——中国特色高等教育质量保障治理体系研究[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2018: 17.
[30]	王孙禺, 赵自强, 雷环. 中国工程教育认证制度的构建与完善——国际实质等效的认证制度建设十年回望[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2014(5): 23-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDGJ201405005.htm
[31]	约翰·S. 布鲁贝克. 高等教育哲学[M]. 王承绪, 郑继伟, 张维平, 等译. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 2001: 103.
[32]	JOHNSTON R J. Quality assessment of teaching: inputs, processes and outputs[J]. Journal of geography in higher education, 1994(2): 184-193.
[33]	钟启泉, 汪霞, 王文静. 课程与教学论[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2008: 168.
[34]	薛松, 万红霞, 崔鸿. 专业认证背景下教师教育课程创新与实践研究[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2021(6): 83-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLJG202106015.htm