| Citation: |
QIN Pengmin, LAI Qiantu, MENG Ming. The Self-prioritization Effect in Conscious Access[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (1): 56-74.
|
The self-prioritization effects have been well-documented in many cognitive processing, yet the question whether it also shows in conscious access remains contentious. To address this issue, researchers have employed a range of experimental paradigms including stimulus degradation, visual masking, binocular rivalry, continuous flash suppression, inattentional blindness, and attentional blink. Additionally, the altered consciousness states (sleep, anesthesia, and disorders of consciousness) have been employed in other studies. Some studies have found evidence of a self-advantage in conscious access, leading to the proposal of numerous conflicting assumptions. For example, attentional blink and inattentional blindness are hypothesized to disrupt visual consciousness by interrupting the attentional process. Consequently, a question arises regarding whether the early selection theory or the late selection theory can more accurately explain the processing advantage of self-related stimuli within these two paradigms. However, the debates remain unresolved, calling for future research to further explore the observed inconsistencies and the underlying neural mechanisms.
| [1] |
DEHAENE S, CHANGEUX J P. Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing[J]. Neuron, 2011, 70(2): 200-227. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.03.018
|
| [2] |
MUDRIK L, DEOUELL L Y. Neuroscientific evidence for processing without awareness[J]. Annual review of neuroscience, 2022, 45: 403-423. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-033151
|
| [3] |
TACIKOWSKI P, EHRSSON H H. Preferential processing of self-relevant stimuli occurs mainly at the perceptual and conscious stages of information processing[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2016, 41: 139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.013
|
| [4] |
MORAY N. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 1959, 11(1): 56-60. doi: 10.1080/17470215908416289
|
| [5] |
SYMONS C S, JOHNSON B T. The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1997, 121(3): 371-394. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
|
| [6] |
MA Y, HAN S. Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 2010, 36(3): 619-633. doi: 10.1037/a0015797
|
| [7] |
TREISMAN A M. Contextual cues in selective listening[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 1960, 12(4): 242-248. doi: 10.1080/17470216008416732
|
| [8] |
KIM C Y, BLAKE R. Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible "invisible"[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2005, 9(8): 381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012
|
| [9] |
BREITMEYER B G. Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2015, 35: 234-250. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.012
|
| [10] |
CAVANNA A E, NANI A, BLUMENFELD H, et al. Neuroimaging of consciousness[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2013: 133.
|
| [11] |
ALKIRE M T, MILLER J. General anesthesia and the neural correlates of consciousness[J]. Progress in brain research, 2005, 150: 229-597.
|
| [12] |
HERMANN B, SANGARÉ A, MUNOZ-MUSAT E, et al. Importance, limits and caveats of the use of "disorders of consciousness" to theorize consciousness[J]. Neuroscience of consciousness, 2021(2): niab048.
|
| [13] |
BREITMEYER B, OGMEN H. Visual masking: time slices through conscious and unconscious vision[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
|
| [14] |
BLAKE R, LOGOTHETIS N K. Visual competition[J]. Nature reviews neuroscience, 2002, 3(1): 13-21. doi: 10.1038/nrn701
|
| [15] |
GAYET S, VAN DER STIGCHEL S, PAFFEN C L E. Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2014(5): article460.
|
| [16] |
RAYMOND J E, SHAPIRO K L, ARNELL K M. Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 1992, 18(3): 849-860. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.849
|
| [17] |
MACK A, ROCK I. Inattentional blindness[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.
|
| [18] |
HOWARTH C I, ELLIS K. The relative intelligibility threshold for one's own name compared with other names[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 1961, 13(4): 236-239. doi: 10.1080/17470216108416500
|
| [19] |
SHELLEY-TREMBLAY J, MACK A. Metacontrast masking and attention[J]. Psychological science, 1999, 10(6): 508-515. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00197
|
| [20] |
DI LOLLO V, DIXON P. Two forms of persistence in visual information processing[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 1988, 14(4): 671-681. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.4.671
|
| [21] |
DI LOLLO V, ENNS J T, RENSINK R A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 2000, 129(4): 481-507. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.481
|
| [22] |
BREITMEYER B, OGMEN H. Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: a comparison, review, and update[J]. Perception & psychophysics, 2000, 62(8): 1572-1595.
|
| [23] |
AGAOGLU S, BREITMEYER B, OGMEN H. Metacontrast masking and attention do not interact[J]. Attention, perception, & psychophysics, 2016, 78: 1363-1380.
|
| [24] |
DORADZIŃSKA L, WÓJCIK M J, PAŹ M, et al. Unconscious perception of one's own name modulates amplitude of the P3B ERP component[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2020, 147: 107564. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107564
|
| [25] |
BOLA M, PAŹ M, DORADZIŃSKA L, et al. The self-face captures attention without consciousness: evidence from the N2pc ERP component analysis[J]. Psychophysiology, 2021, 58(4): e13759. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13759
|
| [26] |
TACIKOWSKI P, EHRSSON H H. Preferential processing of self-relevant stimuli occurs mainly at the perceptual and conscious stages of information processing[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2016, 41: 139-149. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.013
|
| [27] |
BLAKE R. Dichoptic reading: the role of meaning in binocular rivalry[J]. Perception & psychophysics, 1988, 44(2): 133-141.
|
| [28] |
GENG H, ZHANG S, LI Q, et al. Dissociations of subliminal and supraliminal self-face from other-face processing: behavioral and ERP evidence[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2012, 50(12): 2933-2942. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.040
|
| [29] |
ZHOU S, XU Y, WANG N, et al. Deficits of subliminal self-face processing in schizophrenia[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2020, 79: 102896. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102896
|
| [30] |
STEIN T, STERZER P. Unconscious processing under interocular suppression: getting the right measure[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2014, 5: Article 387.
|
| [31] |
STEIN T, HEBART M N, STERZER P. Breaking continuous flash suppression: a new measure of unconscious processing during interocular suppression?[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2011, 5: 167.
|
| [32] |
DEL CUL A, BAILLET S, DEHAENE S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness[J]. PLoS biology, 2007, 5(10): e260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050260
|
| [33] |
SUI J, LIU M, MEVORACH C, et al. The salient self: the left intraparietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association[J]. Cerebral cortex, 2015, 25(4): 1060-1068. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht302
|
| [34] |
STEIN T, SIEBOLD A, VAN ZOEST W. Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 2016, 42(3): 303-307. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000197
|
| [35] |
MACRAE C N, VISOKOMOGILSKI A, GOLUBICKIS M, et al. Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 2017, 43(3): 438-443. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000361
|
| [36] |
NOEL J P, BLANKE O, SERINO A, et al. Interplay between narrative and bodily self in access to consciousness: no difference between self-and non-self attributes[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2017, 8: article72.
|
| [37] |
KANG M S, BLAKE R, WOODMAN G F. Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression[J]. Journal of neuroscience, 2011, 31(38): 13535-13545. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1691-11.2011
|
| [38] |
BROADBENT D E. Perception and communication[M]. London: Pergamon Press, 1958: 297-316.
|
| [39] |
DEUTSCH J A, DEUTSCH D. Attention: some theoretical considerations[J]. Psychological review, 1963, 70(1): 80-90. doi: 10.1037/h0039515
|
| [40] |
MACK A, PAPPAS Z, SILVERMAN M, et al. What we see: inattention and the capture of attention by meaning[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2002, 11(4): 488-506. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00028-4
|
| [41] |
LIN S H, YEH Y Y. Attentional load and the consciousness of one's own name[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2014, 26: 197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.008
|
| [42] |
DEVUE C, LALOYAUX C, FEYERS D, et al. Do pictures of faces, and which ones, capture attention in the inattentional-blindness paradigm?[J]. Perception, 2009, 38(4): 552-568. doi: 10.1068/p6049
|
| [43] |
SHAPIRO K L, CALDWELL J, SORENSEN R E. Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual"cocktail party" effect[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 1997, 23(2): 504-514. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.504
|
| [44] |
DAGENBACH D, CARR T H. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994: 151-188.
|
| [45] |
SHAPIRO K L, RAYMOND J E, ARNELL K M. Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 1994, 20(2): 357-371. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.357
|
| [46] |
LAVIE N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention[J]. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 1995, 21(3): 451-468. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451
|
| [47] |
LAVIE N. Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2005, 9(2): 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
|
| [48] |
GIESBRECHT B, SY J L, LEWIS M K. Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection[J]. Vision research, 2009, 49(10): 1378-1388. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.013
|
| [49] |
TIBBOEL H, DE HOUWER J, VAN BOCKSTAELE B, et al. Is the diminished attentional blink for salient T2 stimuli driven by a response bias?[J]. The psychological record, 2013, 63: 427-439. doi: 10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.002
|
| [50] |
DENT K, COLE G G. Gatecrashing the visual cocktail party: how visual and semantic similarity modulate the own name benefit in the attentional blink[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2019, 72(5): 1102-1111. doi: 10.1177/1747021818778694
|
| [51] |
KANG J, HAM B J, WALLRAVEN C. Cannot avert the eyes: reduced attentional blink toward others' emotional expressions in empathic people[J]. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017, 24: 810-820.
|
| [52] |
OSWALD I A N, TAYLOR A M, TREISMAN M. Discriminative responses to stimulation during human sleep[J]. Brain: a journal of neurology, 1960, 83: 440-453. doi: 10.1093/brain/83.3.440
|
| [53] |
LANGFORD G W, MEDDIS R, PEARSON A J D. Awakening latency from sleep for meaningful and non-meaningful stimuli[J]. Psychophysiology, 1974, 11(1): 1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1974.tb00815.x
|
| [54] |
PORTAS C M, KRAKOW K, ALLEN P, et al. Auditory processing across the sleep-wake cycle: simultaneous EEG and fMRI monitoring in humans[J]. Neuron, 2000, 28(3): 991-999. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00169-0
|
| [55] |
BEH H C, BARRATT P E H. Discrimination and conditioning during sleep as indicated by the electroencephalogram[J]. Science, 1965, 147: 1470-1471. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3664.1470
|
| [56] |
VOSS U, HARSH J. Information processing and coping style during the wake/sleep transition[J]. Journal of sleep research, 1998, 7(4): 225-232. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1998.00117.x
|
| [57] |
SMITH G A, SPLAINGARD M, HAYES J R, et al. Comparison of a personalized parent voice smoke alarm with a conventional residential tone smoke alarm for awakening children[J]. Pediatrics, 2006, 118(4): 1623-1632. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0125
|
| [58] |
SMITH G A, CHOUNTHIRATH T, SPLAINGARD M. Effectiveness of a voice smoke alarm using the child's name for sleeping children: a randomized trial[J]. The journal of pediatrics, 2019, 205: 250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.027
|
| [59] |
PERRIN F, GARCÍA-LARREA L, MAUGUIōRE F, et al. A differential brain response to the subject's own name persists during sleep[J]. Clinical neurophysiology, 1999, 110(12): 2153-2164. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00177-7
|
| [60] |
RUBY P, BLOCHET C, EICHENLAUB J B, et al. Alpha reactivity to complex sounds differs during REM sleep and wakefulness[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11): e79989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079989
|
| [61] |
CANTERO J L, ATIENZA M, SALAS R M. Human alpha oscillations in wakefulness, drowsiness period, and REM sleep: different electroencephalographic phenomena within the alpha band[J]. Neurophysiologie clinique/clinical neurophysiology, 2002, 32(1): 54-71. doi: 10.1016/S0987-7053(01)00289-1
|
| [62] |
BENCA R M, OBERMEYER W H, LARSON C L, et al. EEG alpha power and alpha power asymmetry in sleep and wakefulness[J]. Psychophysiology, 1999, 36(4): 430-436. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3640430
|
| [63] |
BLUME C, DEL GIUDICE R, LECHINGER J, et al. Preferential processing of emotionally and self-relevant stimuli persists in unconscious N2 sleep[J]. Brain and language, 2017, 167: 72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.02.004
|
| [64] |
BLUME C, DEL GIUDICE R, WISLOWSKA M, et al. Standing sentinel during human sleep: continued evaluation of environmental stimuli in the absence of consciousness[J]. Neuroimage, 2018, 178: 638-648. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.056
|
| [65] |
WIELEK T, BLUME C, WISLOWSKA M, et al. Decoding brain responses to names and voices across different vigilance states[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(10): 3393. doi: 10.3390/s21103393
|
| [66] |
ADRIAN E D, BREMER F, JASPER H H. Brain mechanisms and consciousness: a symposium organized by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1954: 137.
|
| [67] |
PANNESE A, HIRSCH J. Unconscious neural specificity for "self" and the brainstem[J]. Journal of consciousness studies, 2013, 20(1-2): 169-179.
|
| [68] |
AGGLETON J P. The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction[M]. Hoboken: Wiley-Liss, 1992: 1-66.
|
| [69] |
FRITH C D, FRISTON K J, LIDDLE P F, et al. Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET[J]. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series B: biological sciences, 1991, 244(1311): 241-246. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0077
|
| [70] |
HYDER F, PHELPS E A, WIGGINS C J, et al. "Willed action": a functional MRI study of the human prefrontal cortex during a sensorimotor task[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 1997, 94(13): 6989-6994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6989
|
| [71] |
ANDRILLON T, KOUIDER S. The vigilant sleeper: neural mechanisms of sensory (de) coupling during sleep[J]. Current opinion in physiology, 2020, 15: 47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2019.12.002
|
| [72] |
HALÁSZ P. K-complex, a reactive EEG graphoelement of NREM sleep: an old chap in a new garment[J]. Sleep medicine reviews, 2005, 9(5): 391-412. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2005.04.003
|
| [73] |
BASTIEN C H, LADOUCEUR C, CAMPBELL K B. EEG characteristics prior to and following the evoked K-complex[J]. Canadian journal of experimental psychology/revue canadienne de psycho-logie expérimentale, 2000, 54(4): 255-265. doi: 10.1037/h0087345
|
| [74] |
WAUQUIER A, ALOE L, DECLERCK A. K-complexes: are they signs of arousal or sleep protective?[J]. Journal of sleep research, 1995, 4(3): 138-143. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1995.tb00162.x
|
| [75] |
KURTZ D, TRAPP C, KIENY M T, et al. Study of recovery and the post-anaesthetic period (author's transl)[J]. Revue d'electroencephalographie et de neurophysiologie clinique, 1977, 7(1): 62-69. doi: 10.1016/S0370-4475(77)80036-1
|
| [76] |
JUNG Y S, PAIK H, MIN S H, et al. Calling the patient's own name facilitates recovery from general anaesthesia: a randomised double-blind trial[J]. Anaesthesia, 2017, 72(2): 197-203. doi: 10.1111/anae.13688
|
| [77] |
LAWES E G. Auditory stimulation and levels of anaesthesia[J]. Anaesthesia, 2017, 72(8): 1043-1044. doi: 10.1111/anae.13945
|
| [78] |
KNIPPER M, VAN DIJK P, NUNES I, et al. Advances in the neurobiology of hearing disorders: recent developments regarding the basis of tinnitus and hyperacusis[J]. Progress in neurobiology, 2013, 111: 17-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.08.002
|
| [79] |
LAUREYS S, PERRIN F, FAYMONVILLE M E, et al. Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state[J]. Neurology, 2004, 63(5): 916-918. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000137421.30792.9B
|
| [80] |
CRONE J S, HÖLLER Y, BERGMANN J, et al. Self-related processing and deactivation of cortical midline regions in disorders of consciousness[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013, 7: 504-514.
|
| [81] |
QIN P, DI H, LIU Y, et al. Anterior cingulate activity and the self in disorders of consciousness[J]. Human brain mapping, 2010, 31(12): 1993-2002. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20989
|
| [82] |
BICK A S, LEKER R R, BEN-HUR T, et al. Implementing novel imaging methods for improved diagnosis of disorder of consciousness patients[J]. Journal of the neurological sciences, 2013, 334(1-2): 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.08.009
|
| [83] |
NICHOLAS C R, MCLAREN D G, GAWRYSIAK M J, et al. Functional neuroimaging of persona-llyrelevant stimuli in a paediatric case of impaired awareness[J]. Brain injury, 2014, 28(8): 1135-1138. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.890745
|
| [84] |
PERRIN F, SCHNAKERS C, SCHABUS M, et al. Brain response to one's own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome[J]. Archives of neurology, 2006, 63(4): 562-569. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.4.562
|
| [85] |
CRIVELLI D, VENTURELLA I, FOSSATI M, et al. EEG and ANS markers of attention response in vegetative state: different responses to own vs. other names[J]. Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2019, 30(9): 1629-1647.
|
| [86] |
RIVERA-LILLO G, ROJAS-LÍBANO D, BURGOS P, et al. Reduced delta-band modulation underlies the loss of P300 responses in disorders of consciousness[J]. Clinical neurophysiology, 2018, 129(12): 2613-2622. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.104
|
| [87] |
FERRÉ F, HEINE L, NABOULSI E, et al. Self-processing in coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state[J/OL]. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1145253.
|
| [88] |
CAVINATO M, VOLPATO C, SILVONI S, et al. Event-related brain potential modulation in patients with severe brain damage[J]. Clinical neurophysiology, 2011, 122(4): 719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.024
|
| [89] |
SERGENT C, FAUGERAS F, ROHAUT B, et al. Multidimensional cognitive evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness using EEG: a proof of concept study[J]. NeuroImage: clinical, 2017, 13: 455-469. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.004
|
| [90] |
SCHNAKERS C, PERRIN F, SCHABUS M, et al. Voluntary brain processing in disorders of consciousness[J]. Neurology, 2008, 71(20): 1614-1620. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000334754.15330.69
|
| [91] |
FELLINGER R, KLIMESCH W, SCHAKERS C, et al. Cognitive processes in disorders of consciousness as revealed by EEG time-frequency analyses[J]. Clinical neurophysiology, 2011, 122(11): 2177-2184. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.004
|
| [92] |
THUL A, LECHINGER J, DONIS J, et al. EEG entropy measures indicate decrease of cortical information processing in disorders of consciousness[J]. Clinical neurophysiology, 2016, 127(2): 1419-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.039
|
| [93] |
LECHINGER J, WIELEK T, BLUME C, et al. Event-related EEG power modulations and phase connectivity indicate the focus of attention in an auditory own name paradigm[J]. Journal of neurology, 2016, 263: 1530-1543. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8150-z
|
| [94] |
WU M, BAO W X, ZHANG J, et al. Effect of acoustic stimuli in patients with disorders of consciousness: a quantitative electroencephalography study[J]. Neural regeneration research, 2018, 13(11): 1900-1906. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.238622
|
| [95] |
HAUGER S L, SCHNAKERS C, ANDERSSON S, et al. Neurophysiological indicators of residual cognitive capacity in the minimally conscious state[J/OL]. Behavioural neurology, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/145913.
|
| [96] |
CHENG L, GOSSERIES O, YING L, et al. Assessment of localisation to auditory stimulation in post-comatose states: use the patient's own name[J]. BMC neurology, 2013, 13: 1-6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-1
|
| [97] |
MAJERUS S, GILL-THWAITES H, ANDREWS K, et al. Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage[J]. Progress in brain research, 2005, 150: 397-413.
|
| [98] |
VANHAUDENHUYSE A, SCHNAKERS C, BRÉDART S, et al. Assessment of visual pursuit in post-comatose states: use a mirror[J]. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery & psychiatry, 2008, 79(2): 223-223.
|
| [99] |
THONNARD M, WANNEZ S, KEEN S, et al. Detection of visual pursuit in patients in minimally conscious state: a matter of stimuli and visual plane?[J]. Brain injury, 2014, 28(9): 1164-1170. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.920521
|
| [100] |
DI H, NIE Y, HU X, et al. Assessment of visual fixation in vegetative and minimally conscious states[J]. BMC neurology, 2014, 14(1): 1-6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-1
|
| [101] |
LUCK S J, VOGEL E K, SHAPIRO K L. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink[J]. Nature, 1996, 383: 616-618. doi: 10.1038/383616a0
|
| [102] |
REES G, RUSSELL C, FRITH C D, et al. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words[J]. Science, 1999, 286: 2504-2507. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2504
|
| [103] |
MATHER M, CLEWETT D, SAKAKI M, et al. Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: how arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory[J]. Behavioral and brain sciences, 2016, 39: e200. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000667
|
| [104] |
LARETZAKI G, PLAINIS S, ARGYOPOULOS S, et al. Threat and anxiety affect visual contrast perception[J]. Journal of psychopharmacology, 2010, 24(5): 667-675. doi: 10.1177/0269881108098823
|
| [105] |
PADMALA S, PESSOA L. Affective learning enhances visual detection and responses in primary visual cortex[J]. Journal of neuroscience, 2008, 28(24): 6202-6210. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1233-08.2008
|
| [106] |
PHELPS E A, LING S, CARRASCO M. Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention[J]. Psychological science, 2006, 17(4): 292-299. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x
|
| [107] |
SHETH B R, PHAM T. How emotional arousal and valence influence access to awareness[J]. Vision research, 2008, 48(23-24): 2415-2424. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.013
|
| [108] |
QIANH, WANG Z, LI C, et al. Prioritised self-referential processing is modulated by emotional arousal[J]. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 2020, 73(5): 688-697. doi: 10.1177/1747021819892158
|
| [109] |
KUNIMOTO C, MILLER J, PASHLER H. Confidence and accuracy of near-threshold discrimination responses[J]. Consciousness and cognition, 2001, 10(3): 294-340. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2000.0494
|
| [110] |
SUMNER P, TSAI P C, YU K, et al. Attentional modulation of sensorimotor processes in the absence of perceptual awareness[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2006, 103(27): 10520-10525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601974103
|
| [111] |
ARU J, RUTIKU R, WIBRAL M, et al. Early effects of previous experience on conscious perception[J]. Neuroscience of consciousness, 2016(1): niw004.
|
| [112] |
ANDERSON A K, PHELPS E A. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events[J]. Nature, 2001, 411: 305-309. doi: 10.1038/35077083
|
| [113] |
MITCHELLl D G V, GREENING S G. Conscious perception of emotional stimuli: brain mechanisms[J]. The neuroscientist, 2012, 18(4): 386-398. doi: 10.1177/1073858411416515
|
| [114] |
GAILLARD R, DEL CUL A, NACCACHE L, et al. Nonconscious semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2006, 103(19): 7524-7529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600584103
|
| [115] |
SERGENT C, BAILLET S, DEHAENE S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink[J]. Nature neuroscience, 2005, 8(10): 1391-1400. doi: 10.1038/nn1549
|
| [116] |
SERGENT C, CORAZZOL M, LABOURET G, et al. Bifurcation in brain dynamics reveals a signature of conscious processing independent of report[J]. Nature communications, 2021, 12(1): 1149. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21393-z
|
| [117] |
TSUCHIYA N, WILKE M, FRÄSSLE S, et al. No-report paradigms: extracting the true neural correlates of consciousness[J]. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2015, 19(12): 757-770. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: