Characteristics and Development of Young Teachers' Teaching Behavior in the High-quality Class: An Analysis of Heteromorphic Lessons in "National Middle School Physics Teacher Teaching Competition"

FENG Xiumei; XIA Min

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2022 > (3): 66-77.

FENG Xiumei, XIA Min. Characteristics and Development of Young Teachers' Teaching Behavior in the High-quality Class: An Analysis of Heteromorphic Lessons in "National Middle School Physics Teacher Teaching Competition"[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2022, (3): 66-77.

Citation:

PDF (2530 KB)

Characteristics and Development of Young Teachers' Teaching Behavior in the High-quality Class: An Analysis of Heteromorphic Lessons in "National Middle School Physics Teacher Teaching Competition"

More Information

Received Date: January 19, 2022
Available Online: May 30, 2022

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Based on NVivo, a video analysis software, 12 award-winning videos of heteromorphic lessons on the same topic in the "National Middle School Physics Young Teacher Teaching Competition" were investigated with the help of improved Flanders interactive analysis system PFIAS, the S-T method and lag sequential analysis (LSA). The characteristics of the teaching behavior structure, the behavior interaction and the behavior tendency of young teachers were comprehensively analyzed through the behavior ratios, teaching mode and significant behavior transformation in the high-quality class in order to provide models and references for future young teachers. The results show that in the high-quality class the teachers stimulate students' learning motivation with praises, acceptance and empathy and indirectly guide students to answer questions and explore actively, which results in a harmonious classroom atmosphere. The ratio of teachers' behavior to students' is appropriate and the behavior conversion rate is moderate in most classes, which conforms to the mixed teaching model. Multiple interactions with behavior stability and strengthened interaction between operational behavior sequence and IRF are observed as the main features of behavioral interaction, which shows that the interaction is reasonable and orderly. From the perspective of development trend, students' status as the subject of cognition is gradually strengthened. It is noted that more open questions with less presetting traces are needed in high-quality class.
- high-quality physics class in middle school,
- teaching behavior,
- heteromorphic lessons,
- teacher professional development,
- PFIAS

FullText(HTML)

References (24)

References

[1]	FLANDERS N A. Intent, action and feedback: a preparation for teaching[J]. Journal of teacher education, 1963, 14(3): 251-260. doi: 10.1177/002248716301400305
[2]	顾小清, 王炜. 支持教师专业发展的课堂分析技术新探索[J]. 中国电化教育, 2004(7): 18-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2004.07.004
[3]	方海光, 高辰柱, 陈佳. 改进型弗兰德斯互动分析系统及其应用[J]. 中国电化教育, 2012(10): 109-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2012.10.022
[4]	高瑛, 林康立, 马宏佳. 研究现代化学课堂教学行为的量化工具——3C-FIAS[J]. 化学教育, 2016(5): 18-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FXJJ201605005.htm
[5]	陈珍国, 邓志文, 于广瀛, 等. 基于FIAS分析模型的翻转课堂师生互动行为研究——以中学物理课堂为例[J]. 全球教育展望, 2014(9): 21-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201409005.htm
[6]	胡丹妮, 章梦瑶, 郑勤华. 基于滞后序列分析法的在线学习者活动路径可视化分析[J]. 电化教育研究, 2019(5): 55-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DHJY201905010.htm
[7]	彭林华, 林晓凡. 基于滞后序列分析的智慧课堂教学行为研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2021(7): 55-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2021.07.007
[8]	BAKEMAN R, GOTTMAN J M. Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 108-113.
[9]	FLANDERS N A. Analyzing teacher behavior [M]. MA: Addison-Wesley, 1970.
[10]	宁虹, 武金红. 建立数量结构与意义理解的联系——弗兰德互动分析技术的改进运用[J]. 教育研究, 2003(5): 23-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ200305003.htm
[11]	王鉴, 李泽林. 课堂观察与分析技术[M]. 兰州: 甘肃教育出版社, 2014: 200-225.
[12]	加里·鲍里奇. 有效教学方法[M]. 易东平, 译, 南京: 江苏教育出版社, 2002: 213.
[13]	钟以俊. 论优化课堂教学结构的美学法则[J]. 课程. 教材. 教法, 1995(7): 8-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJJF507.002.htm
[14]	傅德荣. 教育信息处理: 第2版[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2011.
[15]	吴志华, 周喜欢. 基于IRF话语分析理论的课堂对话教学有效性分析[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2015(3): 71-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYX201503017.htm
[16]	陈秀娟, 汪小勇. 对弗兰德斯互动分析系统应用的探讨——以同课异构为例[J]. 电化教育研究, 2014(11): 83-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DHJY201411014.htm
[17]	陈凯, 马宏佳, 李丹. 基于3C-FIAS的优质科学课堂互动研究[J]. 全球教育展望, 2019, 48(1): 82-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WGJN201901006.htm
[18]	宋宇, 丁莹, 朱佳, 等. 基于序列模式挖掘的多类教师群体互动式课堂教学研究[J]. 现代教育技术, 2021(10): 40-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJJS202110006.htm
[19]	余文森, 连榕. 教师专业发展[M]. 福州: 福建教育出版社, 2007: 181-184.
[20]	孟迎芳, 连榕, 郭春彦. 专家—熟手—新手型教师教学策略的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2004(4): 70-73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ200404013.htm
[21]	张屹, 祝园, 白清玉, 等. 智慧教室环境下小学数学课堂教学互动行为特征研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2016(6): 43-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDJY201606009.htm
[22]	王陆, 蔡荣啸. 课堂大数据视角下的提问倾向研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2016(7): 82-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DHJY201607012.htm
[23]	郑友富. 专家型教师与新手教师课堂提问的比较研究[J]. 教育科学研究, 2009(11): 57-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYKY200911017.htm
[24]	李煜晖, 郑国民. 核心素养视域下的中小学课堂教学变革[J]. 教育研究, 2018(2): 80-87. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYYJ201802012.htm

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (676) PDF downloads (317)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Characteristics and Development of Young Teachers' Teaching Behavior in the High-quality Class: An Analysis of Heteromorphic Lessons in "National Middle School Physics Teacher Teaching Competition"

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content