Pollution Perception, Village Identity and Household Waste Disposal Behavior——An Empirical Analysis Based on 2 508 Household Survey Data in Hunan Province

XIAO Pan; SU Jing

Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition) > 2024 > (2): 100-116.

XIAO Pan, SU Jing. Pollution Perception, Village Identity and Household Waste Disposal Behavior——An Empirical Analysis Based on 2 508 Household Survey Data in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (2): 100-116.

Citation:

PDF (1838 KB)

Pollution Perception, Village Identity and Household Waste Disposal Behavior——An Empirical Analysis Based on 2 508 Household Survey Data in Hunan Province

XIAO Pan¹,
SU Jing^2, ,

More Information

Received Date: January 09, 2024
Available Online: May 14, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Household garbage pollution control is directly related to the overall effect of rural environmental control. The survey data of rural households in Hunan Province and the ordered Logit model were used to study the effects and mechanisms of pollution perception and village identity on peasant household waste treatment behaviors. It was found that: pollution perception has a significant positive effect on rural households' waste disposal behavior. The direct effect of village identity on farmers' household waste disposal behavior is not significant, but it indirectly promotes villagers' household waste disposal behavior through the intermediary mechanism of institutional trust. Village identity played a significant positive adjustment role in pollution perceptions influencing farmers' household waste disposal behavior. Therefore, we propose policy suggestions to enhance farmers' perception and awareness of household waste pollution and its harmfulness, cultivate and strengthen farmers' village identity, and enhance the credibility and legal administrative ability of village cadres, in order to effectively promote the normalization and environmental protection of farmers' household waste disposal behavior and achieve the goal of ecological livability.
- pollution perception,
- village identity,
- household waste disposal,
- institutional trust

FullText(HTML)

References (40)

References

[1]	赵新民, 姜蔚, 程文明. 基于计划行为理论的农村居民参与人居环境治理意愿研究: 以新疆为例[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 439-447.
[2]	唐林, 罗小锋, 张俊飚. 环境政策与农户环境行为: 行政约束抑或是经济激励[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(6): 147-157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ202106015.htm
[3]	王学婷, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 农村居民生活垃圾合作治理参与行为研究: 基于心理感知和环境干预的分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(2): 459-468. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY201902022.htm
[4]	唐林, 罗小锋, 张俊飚. 社会监督、群体认同与农户生活垃圾集中处理行为——基于面子观念的中介和调节作用[J]. 中国农村观察, 2019(2): 18-33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNCG201902002.htm
[5]	李芬妮, 张俊飚, 何可. 替代与互补: 农民绿色生产中的非正式制度与正式制度[J]. 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 33(6): 51-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZLS201906008.htm
[6]	聂峥嵘, 罗小锋, 唐林, 等. 社会监督、村规民约与农民生活垃圾集中处理参与行为——基于湖北省的调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(9): 2264-2276. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY202109020.htm
[7]	李全鹏, 温轩. 农村生活垃圾问题的多重结构: 基于环境社会学两大范式的解析[J]. 学习与探索, 2020(2): 36-42. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXTS202002006.htm
[8]	左孝凡, 康孟媛, 陆继霞. 社会互动、互联网使用对农村居民生活垃圾分类意愿的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(1): 47-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY202201004.htm
[9]	何可, 张俊飚, 张露, 等. 人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J]. 管理世界, 2015, 14 (5): 75-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201505010.htm
[10]	郭清卉, 李世平, 李昊. 描述性和命令性社会规范对农户亲环境行为的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(1): 235-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NYDX202201021.htm
[11]	贾亚娟, 赵敏娟. 生活垃圾污染感知、社会资本对农户垃圾分类水平的影响: 基于陕西1 374份农户调查数据[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(12): 2370-2381. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRZY202012009.htm
[12]	黄蕊, 李桦, 杨扬, 等. 环境认知、榜样效应对半干旱区居民亲环境行为影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(12): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH201812001.htm
[13]	李芬妮, 张俊飚, 何可. 农户外出务工、村庄认同对其参与人居环境整治的影响[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(12): 185-192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ202012020.htm
[14]	王建明. 资源节约意识对资源节约行为的影响: 中国文化背景下一个交互效应和调节效应模型[J]. 管理世界, 2013(8): 77-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201308010.htm
[15]	葛万达, 盛光华. 环境影响评价的公众参与特征及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(8): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GHZH202008006.htm
[16]	TOMA L, MATHIJS E. Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2007, 83(2): 145-157.
[17]	KHANAL Y, DEVKOTA B P. Farmers' responsibilization in payment for environmental services: lessons from community forestry in Nepal[J]. Forest policy and economics, 2020(118): 1-9.
[18]	CHEN Y Y. Practice of environmentally significant behaviors in rural China: from being motivated by economic gains to being motivated by environmental considerations[J]. Behavioral sciences, 2017, 7(3): 59.
[19]	王玉君, 韩冬临. 经济发展、环境污染与公众环保行为——基于中国CGSS2013数据的多层分析[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2016, 30(2): 79-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZRDX201602011.htm
[20]	ZHOU Z F, LIU J H, ZENG H X. How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers' pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2020(270): 110-126.
[21]	MARQUART-PYATT S T. Concern for the environment among general publics: a cross-national study[J]. Society & natural resources, 2007, 20(10): 883-898.
[22]	BRICKER K S, KERSTETTER D L. Level of specialization and place attachment: an exploratory study of whitewater recreationists[J]. Leisure sciences, 2000(22): 233-257.
[23]	DROSELTIS O, VIGNOLES V L. Towards an integrative model of place identification: dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal level place preferences[J]. Journal of environmental psychology, 2010(30): 23-34.
[24]	王学婷, 张俊飚, 童庆蒙. 地方依恋有助于提高农户村庄环境治理参与意愿吗?——基于湖北省调查数据的分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(4): 136-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRZ202004015.htm
[25]	HERNÁNDEZ B, HIDALGO M C, SALAZAR-LAPLACE M E, et al. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives science direct[J]. Journal of environmental psychology, 2007, 27(4): 310-319.
[26]	CARRUS G, BONAIUTO M, BONNES M. Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy[J]. Environment and behavior, 2005, 37 (2): 237-257.
[27]	MOULAY A, UJANG N, MAULAN S, et al. Understanding the process of parks' attachment: interrelation between place attachment, behavioural tendencies, and the use of public place[J]. City culture & society, 2018, 14: 28-36.
[28]	CHEN N, LARRY D, TRACEY F. Residents' place attachment and word-of-mouthbehaviours: a tale of two cities[J]. Journal of hospitality & tourism management, 2018(36): 1-11.
[29]	ZAJONC R B. Social facilitation[J]. Science, 1965, 149(3681): 269-274.
[30]	徐越倩, 吴丹阳, 陈宁. 地方满意度、地方依恋与社区公民行为关系研究——基于浙江省湖州市长兴县6个移民村的调查[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40(3): 175-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DYYY202103030.htm
[31]	王建民. 转型时期中国社会的关系维持——从"熟人信任"到"制度信任"[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2005(6): 165-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GSSH200506046.htm
[32]	胡珺, 宋献中, 王红建. 非正式制度、家乡认同与企业环境治理[J]. 管理世界, 2017(3): 76-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLSJ201703007.htm
[33]	HARRING N. Understanding the effects of corruption and political trust on willingness to makeeconomic sacrifices for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective[J]. Social science quarterly, 2013, 94(3): 660-671.
[34]	COOK K S. Networks, norms, and trust: the social psychology of social capital[J]. Social psychology quarterly, 2005, 68(1): 4-14.
[35]	HARTMANN E, HERB S. Opportunism risk in service triads: a social capital perspective[J]. International journal of physical distribution and logistics management, 2014, 44(3): 242-256.
[36]	王玉君, 韩冬临. 空气质量、环境污染感知与地方政府环境治理评价[J]. 中国软科学, 2019(8): 41-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGRK201908004.htm
[37]	李芬妮, 张俊飚, 何可, 等. 归属感对农户参与村域环境治理的影响分析——基于湖北省1007个农户调研数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(4): 1027-1039. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJLY202004023.htm
[38]	ANTON C E, LAWRENCE C. Home is where the heart is: the effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation[J]. Journal of environmental psychology, 2014, 40: 451-461.
[39]	李文明, 殷程强, 唐文跃, 等. 观鸟旅游游客地方依恋与亲环境行为——以自然共情与环境教育感知为中介变量[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(1): 215-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201901026.htm
[40]	WILLIAMS R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects[J]. Stata journal, 2012, 12(2): 308-319.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	俞光华，杨梦莹. 高校思想政治教育数字化转型的挑战与对策. 西昌学院学报(社会科学版). 2025(01): 98-109 .
2.	谢志勇，王红. 乡村教师数字化持续专业发展对数字化教学素养的影响——组织支持感和数字化教学自我效能感的中介作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(01): 105-116+206 .
3.	赵敏，任帅. 城乡教育一体化发展的边界阻隔与突破理路. 教育与经济. 2024(02): 22-29+57 .
4.	滕厚雷，文芳，朱艾然. 欠发达地区小学创客教育发展困境表征与内驱路径. 韶关学院学报. 2024(05): 77-83 .
5.	林津燕. 数字时代乡村教师数字素养发展的价值旨归、实践困境与提升进路. 生活教育. 2024(08): 32-38 .
6.	边家胜，姜巧，黄忠，金万锋. 适应数字化教学的我国职前外语教师数字素养研究. 外语学刊. 2024(06): 61-71 .
7.	吴佳臻. 优质均衡背景下城乡义务教育“数字鸿沟”成因及弥合路径探讨. 基础教育研究. 2024(17): 1-4 .
8.	林津燕. 数字时代乡村教师数字素养发展的价值旨归、实践困境与提升进路. 生活教育. 2024(22): 32-38 .
9.	李阳杰. 数字化赋能教师发展的前提审视. 人民教育. 2024(21): 73-75 .
10.	段俊吉. 教育数字化转型中的数字代沟：数字反哺的教育镜像. 中国远程教育. 2023(03): 46-54 .
11.	魏平西. 乡村教育内在性发展的应然图景、现实挑战与突破路径. 教育评论. 2023(10): 29-35 .
12.	郭明旸，曾芯怡. “生存在云端”:教师数字化生存的困境与出路. 中小学教师培训. 2023(12): 21-27 .
13.	曹莹. 我国推进义务教育优质均衡发展的基本逻辑、问题审视与制度完善. 当代教育科学. 2023(11): 74-80 .
14.	钟景迅，赵巾慧. 数字鸿沟的障碍与突破：欠发达地区义务教育阶段教师数字资源应用研究. 现代教育论丛. 2023(06): 40-50 .
15.	李奕婷. 澳大利亚乡村STEM教师跨界学习：动因、机制与反思——基于STEM伙伴关系的分析. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版). 2022(03): 99-111+207 .
16.	左崇良，张磊. 地方高等师范院校与乡村学校“双向渗透”协同育人机制探究——以衡阳师范学院为例. 民族高等教育研究. 2022(03): 71-77 .
17.	左莹. 短视频背景下城乡青年“新数字鸿沟”形成探究. 中国记者. 2022(06): 46-47 .
18.	黄雨晴. 中国数字鸿沟的成因与赋权式治理. 学习与实践. 2022(09): 23-33 .

Other cited types(18)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (56) PDF downloads (20) Cited by(36)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Pollution Perception, Village Identity and Household Waste Disposal Behavior——An Empirical Analysis Based on 2 508 Household Survey Data in Hunan Province

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

Other cited types(18)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content