制造业企业何以“拥抱”AI——基于可解释机器学习模型与动态QCA的证据

Why Do Manufacturing Firms "Embrace" AI? Evidence Based on Explainable Machine Learning Models and Dynamic QCA

  • 摘要: 制造业企业人工智能(AI)技术采纳是实现产业智能化转型的微观基础,然而其复杂的影响机制尚待深入揭示。本文以2011—2023年中国A股上市制造业企业为样本,基于“技术—组织—环境(TOE)”框架,采用可解释机器学习模型(XGBoost-SHAP),从20个潜在因素中识别出关键影响因素,并运用动态QCA方法深入探究制造业企业AI技术采纳的影响机制,构建“关键因素识别—组态机制解析”的研究闭环,得到三点研究发现。第一,研发投入、企业规模、行业集中度、组织冗余、吸收能力及数字化转型意愿是影响制造业企业AI技术采纳排名前六的关键因素,且各因素与AI技术采纳之间普遍存在非线性关系。第二,任何单一影响因素均不构成高AI技术采纳的必要条件,实现高AI技术采纳存在三个组态,即“意愿主导—资源协同型”“环境约束—资源激活型”以及“冗余支撑—能力替代型”,研发投入在上述组态中均为核心条件。第三,在时间维度上,2012—2022年各组态对企业AI技术采纳结果的充分性解释具有较强稳健性,2022—2023年所有组态的组间一致性水平同步显著下滑;而在空间维度上,各组态的组内覆盖度均值呈现地域异质性。因此,从实践层面看,企业应依据自身条件选择适配的AI技术采纳路径,并高度重视研发投入的基础作用;政府的政策制定需要兼顾研发激励的普惠性与区域引导的精准性;产业服务方应提供差异化的产品与服务,以匹配不同的企业AI技术采纳逻辑。

     

    Abstract: The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in manufacturing enterprises serves as the micro-foundation for achieving industrial intelligent transformation; however, its complex influential mechanisms remain to be further elucidated. Based on the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework, this study takes Chinese A-share listed manufacturing enterprises from 2011 to 2023 as samples. It first employs the XGBoost-SHAP method to identify key influential factors from 20 potential variables and subsequently utilizes dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to deeply explore the mechanisms of AI technology adoption, thereby constructing a research closed-loop of "key factor identification and configurational mechanism analysis." The findings indicate that: (1) R&D investment, enterprise size, industry concentration, organizational redundancy, absorptive capacity, and the willingness for digital transformation are the top six key factors influencing AI technology adoption in manufacturing enterprises, with non-linear relationships generally existing between these factors and AI technology adoption. (2) No single condition constitutes a necessary condition for high AI technology adoption. Instead, three distinct configurations lead to high adoption: "willingness-led resource synergy" "environment-constrained resource activation" and "redundancy-supported capability substitution." R&D investment serves as a core condition across all identified configurations. (3) In the temporal dimension, the sufficiency explanations of these configurations remain robust from 2011 to 2022, while the between-group consistency levels of all configurations experienced a simultaneous and significant decline between 2022 and 2023. In the spatial dimension, the mean within-group coverage of each configuration exhibits regional heterogeneity. The conclusions provide empirical evidence and decision-making references for understanding the complex mechanisms of "embracing" AI in the manufacturing sector, assisting enterprises in formulating differentiated adoption strategies and providing a basis for governments to implement precision policies.

     

/

返回文章
返回