• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
ZHAO Qiang. Is Normal Professional Accreditation Effective——Construction of Meta-evaluation Analysis Framework and Comprehensive Fuzzy Analysis[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (2): 49-68.
Citation: ZHAO Qiang. Is Normal Professional Accreditation Effective——Construction of Meta-evaluation Analysis Framework and Comprehensive Fuzzy Analysis[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2024, (2): 49-68.

Is Normal Professional Accreditation Effective——Construction of Meta-evaluation Analysis Framework and Comprehensive Fuzzy Analysis

More Information
  • Received Date: November 13, 2023
  • Available Online: May 14, 2024
  • At a critical time when the Party and the country are comprehensively revitalizing teacher education, conducting an effectiveness study on Normal Professional Accreditation that has just entered the orbit stage is a form of thinking based on a formative meta-evaluation perspective. This paper constructs a meta-evaluation standard system for Normal Professional Accreditation around the "design-process-result" three-dimensional analysis framework from the "fact" and "value" levels, following the logical order of "level-dimension-criterion". Based on empirical investigations of more than 500 stakeholders, the results of multi-level analysis using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation show that the effectiveness of Normal Professional Accreditation at this stage is between "general" and "better", and there are still urgent problems to be improved while the effectiveness of Normal Professional Accreditation is basically recognized.

  • [1]
    赵强, 王丽丽, 张炜. 师范类专业认证推进理路: 沿革、误区与转向[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(1): 53-60. http://journal-s.scnu.edu.cn/cn/article/id/8db24431-62d4-44d4-99cd-df608146affe
    [2]
    杨雄, 杨晓萍. 转向与变革: 专业认证视域下学前教育专业质量建设路径探析[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2020(3): 64-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSJY202002012.htm
    [3]
    周湘林. 本科教学评估制度有效性分析——基于模糊综合评价原理[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2011(2): 87-93. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDGJ201102017.htm
    [4]
    弗兰克·费希尔. 公共政策评估[M]. 吴爱明, 李平, 等译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003: 16-19.
    [5]
    张远增. 公共政策执行评估学理[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2018: 53-54.
    [6]
    霍国强. 我国教育元评价的实践缺失及对策思考[J]. 教育发展研究, 2012(Z2): 21-25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHGJ2012Z2008.htm
    [7]
    边沁. 政府片论[M]. 沈叔平, 等译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 239.
    [8]
    胡永红, 吴邵兰, 艾安丽. 我国体育教育专业认证工作存在的问题与优化路径[J]. 体育学刊, 2021(2): 72-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TYXK202102012.htm
    [9]
    埃哈尔·费埃德伯格. 权力与规则: 组织行动的动力[M]. 张月, 等译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2005: 27-28.
    [10]
    威廉·N. 邓恩. 公共政策分析导论(第四版)[M]. 谢明, 伏燕, 朱雪宁, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 240-244.
    [11]
    埃贡·G. 古贝, 伊冯娜·S. 林肯. 第四代评估[M]. 秦霖, 蒋燕玲, 等译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008: 14-15.
    [12]
    韩福荣, 郝进. 质量管理体系有效性综合评价模型[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2000(3): 120-124. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJGD200003024.htm
    [13]
    周均. 美国教师教育认可标准的变革与发展[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2009: 235.
    [14]
    徐祖胜, 杨兆山. 我国高校师范类专业认证的实践反思[J]. 教师教育研究, 2021(6): 72-77. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDSZ202106011.htm
    [15]
    伯顿·克拉克. 高等教育系统——学术组织的跨国研究[M]. 王承绪, 等译. 杭州: 杭州大学出版社, 1994: 311.
    [16]
    张红伟. 中国高等教育评估管理机制研究[M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2014: 173.
    [17]
    周光礼. 中国高等教育质量保障体系有效性研究[M]. 长沙: 湖南人民出版社, 2012: 30.

Catalog

    Article views (101) PDF downloads (73) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return