• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
DONG Yan, MA Ying-ying. The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic, Sino-US Trade Frictions and the Reconstruction of Asia-Pacific Value Chains——Analysis Based on Hypothesis Extraction Method[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (4): 110-123.
Citation: DONG Yan, MA Ying-ying. The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic, Sino-US Trade Frictions and the Reconstruction of Asia-Pacific Value Chains——Analysis Based on Hypothesis Extraction Method[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (4): 110-123.

The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic, Sino-US Trade Frictions and the Reconstruction of Asia-Pacific Value Chains——Analysis Based on Hypothesis Extraction Method

More Information
  • Received Date: May 15, 2020
  • Available Online: March 21, 2021
  • Before the outbreak of Sino-US trade frictions, the Asia-Pacific production network had been expanding, and the labor division and cooperation had deepened compared with the condition in the early 2000s. Our results show that the average geodetic distance decreased from 1.216 8 to 1.131 8, and the density of Asia-Pacific production network increased from 0.727 5 to 0.818 1. On the basis of the point degree and strength, Laumas indicator and feature vector centrality, China and the United States play the hub roles in the Asia-Pacific production network, which not only provide intermediate products for other Asian and Pacific economies as suppliers, but also drive the production of other economies as demanders. Compared with the GDP losses of various countries, China is the country most affected by Sino-US trade frictions. The electrical and optical equipment industry is the commodity sector most exposed and the air transport service is the service sector most exposed. Economies that provide China with intermediate inputs, including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and ASEAN, also suffer a lot. With the outbreak and spread of COVID-19 worldwide, and the resurgence of Sino-US decoupling theory, in the medium and long term, the Asia-Pacific value chain tends to be simplified and internalized. China should take the advantage of "One Belt and Road" platform and the opportunities brought by the epidemic to promote the further development of domestic value chain.
  • [1]
    樊海潮, 张丽娜.中间品贸易与中美贸易摩擦的福利效应:基于理论与量化分析的研究[J].中国工业经济, 2018(9):41-59.
    [2]
    齐鹰飞, LI YUANFEI.跨国投入产出网络中的贸易摩擦——兼析中美贸易摩擦的就业和福利效应[J].财贸经济, 2019, 40(5):83-95. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cmjj201905006
    [3]
    马忠, 耿文婷.基于假设抽取法的中国区域间碳排放关联分析[J].环境科学研究, 2020, 33(2):312-323. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hjkxyj202002009
    [4]
    佟家栋, 盛斌, 蒋殿春, 等.新冠冲击下的全球经济和对中国的挑战[J].国际经济评论, 2020(3):9-27.
    [5]
    马述忠, 任婉婉, 吴国杰.一国农产品贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工的影响——基于社会网络分析视角[J].管理世界, 2016(3):60-72. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=glsj201603005
    [6]
    CEMOGLU D, CARVALHO V, OZDAGLAR A, TAHBEZ-SALEHI A. The network origins of aggregate fluctuations[J]. Econometrica, 2012, 80(5): 1977-2016. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=10.3982/ECTA9623
    [7]
    MADOR, JOÃO, SÓNIA CABRAL. Networks of value added trade[J]. The world economy, 2017, 40(7): 1291-1313. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=5da91da4499b3c9ffacd2bf9f2523f91
    [8]
    许和连, 成丽红, 孙天阳.离岸服务外包网络与服务业全球价值链提升[J].世界经济, 2018, 41(6):77-101. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sjjj201806004
    [9]
    姚星, 梅鹤轩, 蒲岳.国际服务贸易网络的结构特征及演化研究——基于全球价值链视角[J].国际贸易问题, 2019(4):109-124. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gjmywt201904008
    [10]
    IAMMETTI R, RUSSO A, GALLEGATI M. Key sectors in input-output production networks: an application to brexit[J]. The world economy, 2020, 43(4):840-870.
    [11]
    CERINA F, ZHU Z, CHESSA A, RICCABONI M. World input-output network[J]. PLoS one, 2015, 10(7), e0134025.
    [12]
    LAUMAS P S. The weighting problem in testing the linkage hypothesis[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 1976, 90(2):308-312.
    [13]
    DIETZENBACHER E. The measurement of interindustry linkages: key sectors in the Netherlands[J]. Economic modeling, 1992(9):419-437.
    [14]
    PAELINCK J, et al. Analyse quantitative de certaines phénomènes du développment régional polarisé: essai de simulation statique d'itérarires de propogation'[C]//Problémes de conversion éconmique: analyses théoretiques et études appliquées. Paris: M.-Th. Génin, 1965: 341-387.
    [15]
    TRASSERT G. Zur bestimmung strategischer sektoren mit hilfe von input output modellen[J]. Jahrbucher fur nationalokonomie und statistick. 1968, 182(3): 211-215.
    [16]
    钱明霞, 路正南, 王健.基于假设抽取法的产业部门碳排放关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(9) :34-41. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgrkzyyhj201309006
    [17]
    毛国柱, 骆胤成, 王媛, 等.中国大气污染物重点行业减排分析——基于假设抽取法和价格传导影响系数[J].中国环境科学, 2018, 38(4):1561-1569. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zghjkx201804044
    [18]
    马忠, 耿文婷.基于假设抽取法的中国区域间碳排放关联分析[J].环境科学研究, 2020, 33(2):312-323. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hjkxyj202002009
    [19]
    王亚菲.中国资源消耗与经济增长动态关系的检验与分析[J].资源科学, 2011, 33(1):25-30. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zykx201101004
    [20]
    DIETZENBACHER E, LAHR M L. Expanding extractions[J]. Economic systems research, 2013, 25:341-360.
    [21]
    MILLER R E, BLAIR P D. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009:555-565.
    [22]
    KOOPMAN R, WANG Z. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports[J]. The American economic review, 2014, 104(2) : 459-494.
    [23]
    LOS BART, et al. Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports: comment[J]. The American economic review, 2016, 106(7) : 1958-1966.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 张妍妍,赵帅. 基于CSSCI的我国心理韧性研究的演进脉络及发展趋势分析. 健康研究. 2025(01): 84-89 .
    2. 王迎冬. 职场排斥对员工知识隐藏的双刃剑效应. 重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版). 2024(05): 86-99 .
    3. 肖林生,杨婧萍. 独立学院转设背景下不确定性规避对教师工作不安全感的影响——一个有调节的中介效应模型. 中国劳动关系学院学报. 2023(01): 81-92 .
    4. 侯曼,王倩楠,张珮云. 非权变惩罚对员工工作退缩行为的影响研究——基于领导信任与情绪智力的作用. 西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2022(02): 65-76 .
    5. 曹梦迪,鲁虹. 基于物流企业的创业型领导对员工建设性越轨行为的影响研究. 物流科技. 2022(06): 31-35+57 .
    6. 崔煜雯,郭丽芳. 员工韧性对新型研发机构责任式创新行为的影响——一个有调节的中介模型. 科技进步与对策. 2022(21): 135-142 .
    7. 艾丽,赵宝福,刘孟潇. 领导非权变惩罚对安全偏离行为的影响——消极情绪和道德推脱的链式中介作用. 安全与环境学报. 2021(02): 656-662 .
    8. 仝凤鸣,杨雪,卢亚丽. 基于多主体建模的煤矿员工不安全情绪演化分析. 煤矿安全. 2021(08): 259-264 .
    9. 陈伟珂,刘国义. SOR理论框架下施工人员安全行为研究——情绪智力与具身认知视角. 安全与环境学报. 2021(05): 2139-2148 .
    10. 刘杨,张佳. 乡村中小学校长心理韧性对自主性影响的实证研究——工作延迟满足的中介作用. 基础教育. 2020(06): 48-58 .
    11. 崔彬. 年轻干部的情绪化控制及调节. 决策探索(下). 2019(11): 22-23 .
    12. 李乃文,张文文,牛莉霞. 领导非权变惩罚对矿工不安全行为的影响研究. 中国安全科学学报. 2019(12): 1-6 .
    13. 祁神军,姚明亮,成家磊,陈梅,张云波. 安全激励对具从众动机的建筑工人不安全行为的干预作用. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2018(12): 186-192 .

    Other cited types(30)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(43)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return