李保强, 贾超. 美国ISTE教育管理者标准的解构与审思[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, (1): 26-37.
引用本文: 李保强, 贾超. 美国ISTE教育管理者标准的解构与审思[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, (1): 26-37.
LI Baoqiang, JIA Chao. Deconstruction and Reflection of ISTE Standards for Educational Managers[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (1): 26-37.
Citation: LI Baoqiang, JIA Chao. Deconstruction and Reflection of ISTE Standards for Educational Managers[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, (1): 26-37.

美国ISTE教育管理者标准的解构与审思

Deconstruction and Reflection of ISTE Standards for Educational Managers

  • 摘要: 教育管理者是推进教育治理现代化建设的关键。美国国际教育技术协会(ISTE)标准是重新思考教育和赋权的框架,其教育管理者标准是一个指向教育技术应用的教育管理者“核心标准”,广泛地应用于美国各州的教育管理者发展。该标准以技术加速教学创新为背景,创新性地提出教育管理者的五种角色导向及22条指标要求,对教育管理者发展方向进行规划,具有鲜明的新公共服务理论中“民主社会和公民身份理论”和“组织人本主义和组织对话理论”的理论基因,并折射出创新的管理理念,即强调多维度定位的管理者角色观,关注多主体参与的管理者过程观和促进新技术应用的管理者发展观。但圄于其内在学科思维和实践局限,加之美国政治与教育体制固有特征,该指标存在一定弊端。这为推进中国式教育治理现代化建设,进一步彰显中国的制度优势、治理效能优势和时代优势,提供了反思启迪。

     

    Abstract: Educational administrators are the key to promoting the modernization of educational governance. ISTE standards are a framework for rethinking education and empowerment. Its standards for educational administrators is a core standard for educational administrators that points to the application of educational technology, and is widely used in the development of educational administrators in various states of the United States. The standard is based on the background of accelerating teaching innovation by technology, and innovatively proposes five role orientations and 22 index requirements for educational administrators, and maps out the development direction of educational administrators. It is a new public service theory of democracy and citizenship theory and organization humanism and the theory of dialogue theory of gene and reflects innovative management concepts, that is, the manager's role view which emphasizes multi-dimensional positioning, the manager's process view which focuses on multi-subject participation and the manager's development view which promotes the application of new technology. However, the standard is limited by its internal disciplinary thinking, and combined with the inherent characteristics of the American political and educational system, its implementation efficiency is greatly compromised, which provides an opportunity for reflection and inspiration to promote the modernization of Chinese educational governance and to further highlight the advantages of our system, governance effectiveness, and the advantages of the times.

     

/

返回文章
返回