我国刑事二审审理方式的异化与回归

Alienation and Return of the Trial Mode of Criminal Second Instance in China

  • 摘要: 在两审终审的审级框架下,审理方式作为刑事二审程序的重要内容,在纠正错误判决、保障当事人合法权益方面发挥着重要作用。我国刑事二审审理方式在经历了由立法空白到不断细化的发展进程后,开庭审理理应成为原则;然而,从目前的司法实践来看,刑事二审的开庭率仍不理想,且存在改判案件不开庭审理、繁案重案不开庭审理等问题。为扭转这一异化趋势,通过对刑事二审开庭的价值取向以及当事人权利保障进行衡量,总结出影响刑事二审审理方式的四重考量因素,进而明确开庭审理的范围,并在此基础上构建形式多元的开庭审理方式。即便是基于现实情况与司法资源的制约可不开庭审理的案件,也应在现有基础上构建多重保障,完善监督配套机制,从而使我国刑事二审审理方式回归程序正义。

     

    Abstract: Under the trial-level framework of two tiered system, the trial mode, as an important part of the criminal second instance procedure, plays an important role in correcting the wrong judgment and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned. After the development process from legislative blank to continuous refinement, the trial of criminal second instance in our country should become a principle. However, judging from the current judicial practice, the trial rate of criminal second instance is still not ideal, and there are problems such as retrial cases without trials and heavy cases without trials. In order to reverse this trend of alienation, this paper summarized four factors and two levels that affect the trial mode of criminal second instance by measuring the value orientation of criminal second trial and the rights protection of the parties, defined the scope of the trial, and then constructed diverse forms of trial mode. Even for the cases which can skip the trial process based on the actual situation and judicial resources, multiple guarantees should be built on the existing basis, and supervision and supporting mechanism should be improved, so as to realize the return of procedural justice in the trial mode of criminal second instance in our country.

     

/

返回文章
返回