帅昭文. 人力资本提升视角下扶贫工程成效评估体系的“光环效应”——以教育扶贫和健康扶贫为例[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, (6): 19-27.
引用本文: 帅昭文. 人力资本提升视角下扶贫工程成效评估体系的“光环效应”——以教育扶贫和健康扶贫为例[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, (6): 19-27.
SHUAI Zhao-wen. Analysis of "Halo Effect" in the Effect Assessment System of Poverty Alleviation Projects from the Perspective of Human Capital Promotion——With Evidence from the Poverty Alleviation Projects of Education and Health Care[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019, (6): 19-27.
Citation: SHUAI Zhao-wen. Analysis of "Halo Effect" in the Effect Assessment System of Poverty Alleviation Projects from the Perspective of Human Capital Promotion——With Evidence from the Poverty Alleviation Projects of Education and Health Care[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2019, (6): 19-27.

人力资本提升视角下扶贫工程成效评估体系的“光环效应”——以教育扶贫和健康扶贫为例

Analysis of "Halo Effect" in the Effect Assessment System of Poverty Alleviation Projects from the Perspective of Human Capital Promotion——With Evidence from the Poverty Alleviation Projects of Education and Health Care

  • 摘要: 扶贫重在培养“造血功能”,而“造血功能”依赖于贫困人口人力资本的提升。在影响人力资本方面,一些地方政府的扶贫工程成效评估体系呈现出“光环效应”:行政发包制和科层制共存情况下,贫困县强烈依赖评估体系,以恰好能满足评估指标的扶贫措施、已脱贫县的榜样措施、自身处于相对优势且易见成效的相关措施为“好的措施”,忽视自身短板建设,弱化了扶贫工程对人力资本的提升作用。出于避责逻辑,更因为缺乏对问题导向性的深入理解,地方政府制定评估体系时,欠缺对于深层次的“质”——贫困人口人力资本提升的考虑,从而导致扶贫步入“光环效应”的桎梏。为化解这一影响,建议一些片区内或省域内进行成效评估时,在禀赋有别的贫困地区间、扶贫行动的不同阶段上制定详尽的质量指标并分时分类考核,体现出指标的空间差异性和时间动态性,并且紧紧围绕推动贫困人口人力资本提升这个核心来展开。

     

    Abstract: Poverty alleviation focuses on cultivating self-reliance ability, while the ability depends on the human capital promotion of the poor. In terms of influencing human capital, the effect assessment systems of some local governments present the "halo effect". Under the background of the coexistence of administrative contracting and bureaucracy, poor counties strongly rely on the assessment system. They regard the poverty alleviation measures that just meet the standards, that are taken by some out-of-poverty counties and that are easy to take effect by virtue of the comparative advantages as "good" measures, thus ignoring the overcoming of shortness and weakening the human capital promotion effect of poverty alleviation projects. Moreover, because of the responsibility avoiding logic and the lack of in-depth understanding of problem-oriented nature, the local governments think little about the deep "quality"——the human capital improvement of the poor, which results in the "halo effect" of poverty alleviation projects. In order to eliminate the "halo effect", it is suggested that detailed quality indicators should be formulated according to time-specific and category-specific characteristics at different poverty-stricken areas and different stages when assessments are carried out in some areas or provinces, showing the spatial differences and temporal dynamics of the indicators. What is more, poverty alleviation projects should proceed around the core of promoting the human capital of the poor.

     

/

返回文章
返回