信息化促进教育公平研究检视:问题域框架与问题优化

Informatization Promoting Education Equity: The Question Domain Framework and Question Optimization

  • 摘要: “以信息化促进教育公平”对推进教育现代化和建设教育强国有着深远的战略意义,是一项重大而紧迫的时代课题。但就理论研究而言,相关研究呈现“实践先行而认知迟滞”的现象,研究的实践效度和普遍化指向常常受到质疑。究其原因,该课题涉及教育资源的公共配置,然而教育政策指导下的教育行动边界不能等同理论分析边界;伴随信息技术的革新,研究容易陷入“追新逐热”式的表面思考而忽视“研究问题是什么”,很难从更上层、更稳定的视角整体审视“信息化促进教育公平”。根据教育问题的社会科学和人文学科属性提出“信息化促进教育公平”研究问题域框架,并从基于因果理论的经验性研究和超越工具理性的规范性研究两方面,分别提出相应的研究问题优化建议。本研究有助于理解“信息化促进教育公平”的研究具象,为践行和检视“信息化促进教育公平”提供分析框架,为开展前瞻性和储备性研究提供问题框架。

     

    Abstract: Promoting educational equity with informatization is a major and urgent subject of the time with its far-reaching strategic significance and overall orientation in advancing the modernization of education and building a country of strong education. However, the related theoretical research shows the phenomenon of "practice going first and cognition lagging behind", and the practical validity and generalized direction of research are often questioned. The reason lies in that the subject involves the public allocation of educational resources while the boundary of educational action under the guidance of educational policy cannot be equated with the boundary of theoretical analysis. With the innovation of information technology, research tends to fall into the "chasing hot topics" type of superficial thinking but ignore what the research question is. It is difficult to comprehensively examine the topic "informatization promoting education equity" from a higher-level and more stable perspective. Based on the social science and humanities attributes of educational issues, the framework of the research question domain of "informatization promoting education equity" is put forward and the corresponding suggestions for optimizing the research question are proposed from two aspects: empirical research based on causality theory and normative research beyond instrumental rationality. The research helps to understand the concrete research object of the topic "informatization promoting education equity", provides an analytical framework for corresponding practice and review, and proposes a question framework for conducting prospective studies and reserve research.

     

/

返回文章
返回