陈天祥, 王莹. 软嵌入:基层社会治理中政府行为与文化共同体的契合逻辑[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, (5): 57-69.
引用本文: 陈天祥, 王莹. 软嵌入:基层社会治理中政府行为与文化共同体的契合逻辑[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, (5): 57-69.
CHEN Tian-xiang, WANG Ying. Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (5): 57-69.
Citation: CHEN Tian-xiang, WANG Ying. Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance[J]. Journal of South China normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020, (5): 57-69.

软嵌入:基层社会治理中政府行为与文化共同体的契合逻辑

Soft Embedding: Logic of the Fit between Government Behavior and Cultural Communityin Local Governance

  • 摘要: 一段时期以来,作为基层社会公共性代理人的群众自治性组织出现行政化和官僚化趋势,因国家通过资源汲取推动政权现代化建设而留下的制度惯性和基层社会形成的习俗元制度未发生根本性转变,其他社会主体在充当新代理人的过程中仍面临着嵌入性的张力问题,基层社会公共性的重构面临着外生权威缺乏和内生权威式微的双重困境。基于“嵌入性”和“软治理”的讨论,可以用“软嵌入”一词概括基层社会中新乡贤群体所构建的文化共同体与基层政府行为之间的契合逻辑。松动的威权主义政策为以新乡贤为核心的基层文化共同体提供了集体行动的空间;文化共同体下的价值认同和身份认同驱动着各个主体参与集体行动,并通过非正式的软权力系统作用于基层社会的政治生活;以基层政府为代表的行政性机构用行为导向和行为归化的方式维护着基于文化纽带形成的新公共秩序,进而构建了主体间地位平等化、秩序规范互嵌化、成果评估方式多元化的基层社会治理新格局。

     

    Abstract: For a period of time, the administrative and bureaucratic transformations have occurred in self-governing mass organizations, which play the role of public agents in grassroots society. Due to the institutional inertia left by the administrative reform and the long-term accumulated custom meta-system in local society, non-government organizations still face the problem of embedded tension in the process of social governance. Based on the discussion of "embeddedness" and "soft governance", this article uses the term "soft embeddedness" to summarize the logic of the fit between the cultural community constructed by the New Rural Gentry group and the behavior of grassroots governments. The findings of the study are as follows: loose authoritarian policies provide space for the collective action of the cultural community; the value identity and status identity in the cultural community drive individual subjects to participate in collective action, and affect the political life of grassroots society through the informal cultural value system; the administrative institutions represented by local governments use behavior-oriented and behavior-attributed methods to maintain the new public order formed on the basis of cultural bonds, and then construct a new pattern of grassroots social governance with equal status among subjects, mutual embedding of order norms and diversified evaluation methods for results.

     

/

返回文章
返回